Generic placeholder image

International Journal of Sensors, Wireless Communications and Control

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 2210-3279
ISSN (Online): 2210-3287

Review Article

ETSI ITS: A Comprehensive Overview of the Architecture, Challenges and Issues

Author(s): Faisal Rasheed Lone*, Harsh Kumar Verma and Krishna Pal Sharma

Volume 14, Issue 2, 2024

Published on: 03 January, 2024

Page: [85 - 103] Pages: 19

DOI: 10.2174/0122103279287823231207072006

Price: $65

Abstract

Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) have attracted the attention of developing nations because of their potential to enhance mobility and road safety, two issues that have become increasingly pressing in recent years. Information and Communication Technology (ICT) has accentuated every industry, and the automobile industry is no exception, allowing vehicles to communicate among themselves and the surrounding infrastructure for information exchange using Vehicle-to-Everything (V2X) communication. Vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V), vehicle- to-infrastructure (V2I), vehicle-to-pedestrian (V2P), and vehicle-to-cloud (V2C) connections are made possible through the use of state-of-the-art networking technology. With EVehicles at the forefront, the vision of an ITS expands further. ITS is anticipated to offer wireless network-based services including vehicle occupant entertainment, traffic flow optimization, and accident prevention. Most nations have been trying to standardize the ITS architecture, and the European Union (EU) has been at the forefront by developing and standardizing the ETSI (European Telecommunications Standards Institute) architecture. As the most mature ITS architecture, this paper thoroughly explains the ETSI architecture in a single document for both the researcher's and newcomers' ease. Additionally, the challenges and issues pertinent to adopting and implementing the ITS ecosystem have also been discussed in detail.

Graphical Abstract

[1]
Mejri MN, Ben-Othman J, Hamdi M. Survey on VANET security challenges and possible cryptographic solutions. Vehicul Commun 2014; 1(2): 53-66.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vehcom.2014.05.001]
[2]
Tangade SS, Manvi SS. A survey on attacks, security and trust management solutions in VANETs. Fourth International Conference on Computing, Communications and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT). Tiruchengode, India 2013.04-06 July.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICCCNT.2013.6726668]
[3]
Chen Q, Sowan AK, Xu S. A safety and security architecture for reducing accidents in intelligent transportation systems. IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design, Digest of Technical Papers. ICCAD. San Diego, CA, USA. 2018.05-08 Nov;.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3240765.3243462]
[4]
Shoup D. Cruising for parking. Transp Policy 2006; 13(6): 479-86.
[5]
Paikari E, Tahmasseby S, Far B. A simulation-based benefit analysis of deploying connected vehicles using dedicated short range communication. IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, Proceedings. Dearborn, MI, USA 2014 08-11 June;; pp. 980-5.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IVS.2014.6856462]
[6]
The Role of Mobile Network Operators in Intelligent Transport Systems: Situation Analysis, Challenges and Suggested Approach. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/148644
[7]
Browand F, McArthur J, Radovich C. Fuel saving achieved in the field test of two tandem trucks PATH Research Report. University Of California, Berkeley 2004.
[8]
Dixit M, Kumar R, Sagar AK. VANET: Architectures, research issues, routing protocols, and its applications. International Conference on Computing, Communication and Automation (ICCCA) Greater Noida, India. 2017.29-30 April;
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/CCAA.2016.7813782]
[9]
MacHardy Z, Khan A, Obana K, Iwashina S. V2X access technologies: Regulation, research, and remaining challenges. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor 2018; 20(3): 1858-77.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2018.2808444]
[10]
Kumar N, Chilamkurti N. Collaborative trust aware intelligent intrusion detection in VANETs. Comput Electr Eng 2014; 40(6): 1981-96.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2014.01.009]
[11]
Amrita G. Security issues and challenges in V2X: A survey. Comput Netw 2018; 169: 107093.
[12]
Mitrokotsa A, Dimitrakakis C. Intrusion detection in MANET using classification algorithms: The effects of cost and model selection. Ad Hoc Netw 2013; 11(1): 226-37.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adhoc.2012.05.006]
[13]
Alouache L. Survey on IoV routing protocols: Security and network architecture. Int J Commun Syst 2019; 32(2): e3894.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/dac.3849]
[14]
Chen S, Hu J, Shi Y, et al. Vehicle-to-everything (v2x) services supported by LTE-based systems and 5G. IEEE Commun Stand Magaz 2017; 1(2): 70-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MCOMSTD.2017.1700015]
[15]
Kenney JB. Dedicated Short-Range Communications (DSRC) standards in the United States. Proc IEEE 2011; 99(7): 1162-82.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2011.2132790]
[16]
Boban M, Kousaridas A, Manolakis K, Eichinger J, Xu W. Connected roads of the future: Use cases, requirements, and design considerations for vehicle-To-everything communications. IEEE Veh Technol Mag 2018; 13(3): 110-23.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MVT.2017.2777259]
[17]
EN 302 665 - V1.1.1 - Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS); Communications Architecture. 2010. Available from: http://portal.etsi.org/chaircor/ETSI_support.asp
[18]
Mokhtari S, Mirjalily G, Silva CM, Sarubbi JFM, Nogueira JMS. The Deployment of roadside units in vehicular networks based on the V2I connection duration. International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications. Thessaloniki, Greece 2020 12-14 Oct;.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/WiMob50308.2020.9253436]
[19]
Tuyisenge L, Ayaida M, Tohme S, Afilal LE. Network architectures in Internet of Vehicles (IoV): Review, protocols analysis, challenges and issues. In: Technologies and Services Towards Smart City. Springer 2018.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05081-8_1]
[20]
Contreras-castillo J, Zeadally S, Antonio J, Ibáñez G. A seven-layered model architecture for internet of vehicles. J Inform Telecommun 2017; 1839: 4-22.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/24751839.2017.1295601]
[21]
Guerrero-Ibanez J. Integration challenges of intelligent transportation systems with connected vehicle, cloud computing, and internet of things technologies. IEEE Wirel Commun 2015; 22(6): 122-8.
[22]
J2735_201603: Dedicated Short Range Communications (DSRC) Message Set DictionaryTM - SAE International. Available from: https://www.sae.org/standards/content/j2735_201603/(Accessed: Jul. 29, 2022).
[23]
Jiang D, Delgrossi L. IEEE 802.11p: Towards an international standard for wireless access in vehicular environments. IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference. Marina Bay, Singapore. 2008 ; pp. 11-14 May;. 2036-40.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/VETECS.2008.458]
[24]
Hameed Mir Z, Filali F. LTE and IEEE 802.11p for vehicular networking: A performance evaluation. EURASIP J Wirel Commun Netw 2014; 2014(1): 89.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1687-1499-2014-89]
[25]
Bazzi A, Masini BM, Zanella A, Thibault I. On the performance of IEEE 802.11p and LTE-V2V for the cooperative awareness of connected vehicles. IEEE Trans Vehicular Technol 2017; 66(11): 10419-32.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2017.2750803]
[26]
EN 302 636-4-1 - V1.4.1 - Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS); Vehicular Communications; GeoNetworking; Part 4: Geographical addressing and forwarding for point-to-point and point-tomultipoint communications; Sub-part 1: Media-Independent Functionality. 2019. Available from: https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_en/302600_302699/3026360401/0 1.04.01_60/en_3026360401v010401p.pdf
[27]
EN 302 636-5-1 - V2.2.1 - Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS); Vehicular Communications; GeoNetworking; Part 5: Transport Protocols; Sub-part 1: Basic Transport Protocol. 2019. Available from: https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_en/302600_302699/3026360 501/02.02.01_60/en_3026360501v020201p.pdf
[28]
TS 103 097 - V1.3.1 - Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS); Security; Security header and certificate formats. 2017. Available from: https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/103000_103099/103097/01.03.01_60/ts_103097v010301p.pdf
[29]
EN 302 636-5-1 - V2.2.1 - Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS); Vehicular Communications; GeoNetworking; Part 5: Transport Protocols; Sub-part 1: Basic Transport Protocol. 2019. Available from: https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_en/302600_302699/3026360 501/02.02.01_60/en_3026360501v020201p.pdf
[30]
ETSI TS 103 301 V1.3.1 - Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS); Vehicular Communications; Basic Set of Applications; Facilities layer protocols and communication requirements for infrastructure services. 2020. Available from: https: //www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/103300_103399/103301/01.03.01_60 /ts_103301v010301p.pdf
[31]
ISO - ISO/TS 19091:2019 - Intelligent transport systems — Cooperative ITS — Using V2I and I2V communications for applications related to signalized intersections. 2022. Available from: https://www.iso.org/standard/73781.html (Accessed: Aug. 03, 2022).
[32]
EN 302 637-2 - V1.3.1 - Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS); Vehicular Communications; Basic Set of Applications; Part 2: Specification of Cooperative Awareness Basic Service. 2014. Available from: https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_en/302600_302699/3026370 2/01.03.01_30/en_30263702v010301v.pdf
[33]
Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS) Access layer specification for Intelligent Transport Systems operating in the 5 GHz frequency band. 2013. Available from: https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_en/302600_302699/302663/01.02.01_30/en_302663v010201v.pdf
[34]
Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS). Vehicular Communications; GeoNetworking; Part 3: Network architecture. 2010. Available from: http://portal.etsi.org/chaircor/ETSI_support.asp
[35]
TS 102 637-3 - V1.1.1 - Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS); Vehicular Communications; Basic Set of Applications; Part 3: Specifications of Decentralized Environmental Notification Basic Service. 2010. Available from: https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/102600_102699/10263703/01.01.01_60/ts_10263703v010101p.pdf
[36]
EN 302 890-2 - V2.1.1 - Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS); Facilities Layer function; Part 2: Position and Time management (PoTi); Release 2. 2020. Available from: https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_en/302800_302899/30289002/02. 01.01_20/en_30289002v020101a.pdf
[37]
Abboud K, Omar HA, Zhuang W. Interworking of DSRC and cellular network technologies for V2X communications: A survey. IEEE Trans Vehicular Technol 2016; 65(12): 9457-70.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2016.2591558]
[38]
Zong Chen JI. Modified backscatter communication model for wireless communication network applications. IRO J Sustain Wireless Syst 2021; 3(2): 107-17.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.36548/jsws.2021.2.005]
[39]
Atallah RF, Khabbaz MJ, Assi CM. Vehicular networking: A survey on spectrum access technologies and persisting challenges. Vehicu Communi 2015; 2(3): 125-49.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vehcom.2015.03.005]
[40]
Hartenstein H, Laberteaux KP. A tutorial survey on vehicular ad hoc networks. IEEE Commun Mag 2008; 46(6): 164-71.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2008.4539481]
[41]
Molina-Masegosa R, Gozalvez J. LTE-V for sidelink 5G V2X vehicular communications: A new 5G technology for short-range vehicle-to-everything communications. IEEE Veh Technol Mag 2017; 12(4): 30-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MVT.2017.2752798]
[42]
DSRC vs. 5GLTE: Which Will It Be for Connected Vehicles?. Available from: https://www.wardsauto.com/industry-voices/dsrc-vs-5glte-which-will-it-be-connected-vehicles(Accessed: Apr. 10, 2022).
[43]
Huang X, Zhao D, Peng H. Empirical study of DSRC performance based on safety pilot model deployment data. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 2017; 18(10): 2619-28.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2017.2649538]
[44]
DSRC vs. C-V2X: Looking to Impress the Regulators | Electronic Design. Available from: https://www.electronicdesign.com/markets/automotive/article/21805671/dsrc-vs-cv2x-looking-to-impress-the-regulators(Accessed: Apr. 10, 2022).
[45]
Erdem B. IEEE 802.11bd - A seamless evolutionary access layer For ITS-G5/DSRC. Car 2 Car J 2019; 23: 21-7.
[46]
Shulman M. Vehicle safety communications in the United States. 2007. Available from: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.626.7385&rep=rep1&type=pdf(Accessed: Apr. 11, 2022).
[47]
Aloqaily M, Balasubramanian V, Zaman F, Al Ridhawi I, Jararweh Y. Congestion mitigation in densely crowded environments for augmenting QoS in vehicular clouds. DIVANet’18: Proceedings of the 8th ACM Symposium on Design and Analysis of Intelligent Vehicular Networks and Applications.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3272036.3272038]
[48]
Butt TA, Iqbal R, Salah K, Aloqaily M, Jararweh Y. Privacy management in social internet of vehicles: Review, challenges and blockchain based solutions. IEEE Access 2019; 7: 79694-13.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2922236]
[49]
Hasan M, Mohan S, Shimizu T, Lu H. Securing vehicle-to-everything (V2X) communication platforms. IEEE Trans Intell Veh 2019; 5(4): 693-713.
[50]
Sherazi HHR, Iqbal R, Ahmad F, Khan ZA, Chaudary MH. DDoS attack detection: A key enabler for sustainable communication in internet of vehicles. Sustain Comput: Inform Syst 2019; 23: 13-20.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.suscom.2019.05.002]
[51]
Ahmad F, Kurugollu F, Adnane A, Hussain R, Hussain F. MARINE: Man-in-the-middle attack resistant trust model in connected vehicles. IEEE Internet Things J 2020; 7(4): 3310-22.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2020.2967568]
[52]
Chen CM, Xiang B, Liu Y, Wang KH. A secure authentication protocol for internet of vehicles. IEEE Access 2019; 7: 12047-57.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2891105]

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy