Login Register Cart 0
Generic placeholder image

Current Gene Therapy

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 1566-5232
ISSN (Online): 1875-5631

Back
Journal Home About Journal Editorial Board Journal Insight Current Issue Volumes/Issues
Subscribe
Research Article

Segmentation of Thoracic Organs through Distributed Extraction of Visual Feature Patterns Utilizing Resio-Inception U-Net and Deep Cluster Recognition Techniques

Author(s): Karthikeyan Saminathan*, Tathagat Banerjee, Devi Priya Rangasamy and Meenalosini Vimal Cruz

Volume 24, Issue 3, 2024

Published on: 02 January, 2024

Page: [217 - 238] Pages: 22

DOI: 10.2174/0115665232262165231201113932

Price: $65

Abstract

Background: Segmentation of medical images plays a key role in the correct identification and management of different diseases. In this study, we present a new segmentation method that meets the difficulties posed by sophisticated organ shapes in computed tomography (CT) images, particularly targeting lung, breast, and gastric cancers.

Methods: Our suggested methods, Resio-Inception U-Net and Deep Cluster Recognition (RIUDCR), use a Residual Inception Architecture, which combines the power of residual connections and inception blocks to achieve cutting-edge segmentation performance while reducing the risk of overfitting.

Results: We present mathematical equations and functions that describe the design, including the encoding and decoding steps within the UC-Net system. Furthermore, we provide strong testing results that show the effectiveness of our method. Through thorough testing on varied datasets, our method regularly beats current techniques, achieving amazing precision and stability in organ task segmentation. These results show the promise of our residual inception architecture in better medical picture analysis.

Conclusion: In summary, our research not only shows a state-of-the-art segment methodology but also reinforces its usefulness through thorough testing. The inclusion of residual inception architecture in medical picture segmentation offers good possibilities for improving the identification and management of disease planning.

« Previous Next »
[1]
Trullo R, Petitjean C, Ruan S, Dubray B, Nie D, Shen D. Segmentation of organs at risk in thoracic CT images using a sharp mask architecture and conditional random fields. Proc IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging 2017; 2017: 1003-6.
[2]
Milletari F, Navab N, Ahmadi S. V-net: Fully convolutional neural networks for volumetric medical image segmentation. Fourth International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV). Stanford, CA, USA. 2016; pp. 565-71.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/3DV.2016.79]
[3]
Vesal S, Ravikumar N, Maier A. A 2D dilated residual U-Net for multi-organ segmentation in thoracic CT. arxiv 2021 2021; 07710.
[4]
Chen J, Lu Y, Yu Q, et al. Transunet: Transformers make strong encoders for medical image segmentation. arxiv 2021; 2021-04306.
[5]
Lachinov DA. Segmentation of Thoracic Organs Using Pixel Shuffle SegTHOR@ISBI 2019.
[6]
Han M, Yao G, Zhang W, et al. Segmentation of CT Thoracic Organs by Multi-resolution VB-nets. SegTHOR@ISBI 2019.
[7]
Kondratenko V, Denisenko D, Pimkin A, Belyaev M. Segmentation of thoracic organs at risk,CT Images using localization and organ-specific CNN. In: Proc CEUR Workshop, Sun SITE Central Eur 2019; 2349.
[8]
Zhang L, Wang L, Huang Y, Chen H. Segmentation of Thoracic Organs at Risk in CT Images Combining Coarse and Fine Network SegTHOR@ ISBI 2019.
[9]
He T, Guo J, Wang J, Xu X, Yi Z. Multi-task Learning for the Segmentation of Thoracic Organs at Risk in CT images SegTHOR@ISBI 2019.
[10]
Qayyum A, Ang CK. Hybrid 3D-Resnet deep learning model for automatic segmentation of thoracic organs at risk in CT images. International Conference on Industrial Engineering, Applications and Manufacturing (ICIEAM) Sochi, Russia 2020; pp. 18-22.May; 1-5.
[11]
Feng M, Huang W, Wang Y, Xie Y. Multi-organ Segmentation using Simplified Dense V-net with Post-processing. SegTHOR@ ISBI 2019.
[12]
Ronneberger O, Fischer P, Brox T. U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. Med Image Comput Comput-Assisted Interven 2015; 234-41.
[13]
Chen P, Xu C, Li X, Ma Y. Two-stage Network for OAR segmentation SegTHOR@ ISBI 2019.
[14]
Buettner R, Bilo M, Bay N, Zubac T. A systematic literature review of medical image analysis using deep learning. 2020 IEEE Symposium on Industrial Electronics & Applications (ISIEA). TBD, Malaysia. 2020; pp. 17-18.July; 1-4.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ISIEA49364.2020.9188131]
[15]
Khaizi ASA, Rosidi RAM. A mini review on the design of interactive tool for medical image segmentation. 7th International Conference on Engineering Technology and Technopreneurship Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia 2017; pp. 18-20.Sep; 1-5.
[16]
Li S, Zhang Y, Yang X. Semi-supervised cardiac MRI segmentation based on generative adversarial network and variational auto-encoder. IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM) Houston, TX, USA 2021; pp. 09-12.Dec; 1402-5.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/BIBM52615.2021.9669685]
[17]
Adarsh R, Amarnageswarao G, Pandeeswari R, Deivalakshmi S. Dense residual convolutional auto encoder for retinal blood vessels segmentation. 6th International Conference on Advanced Computing and Communication Systems (ICACCS) Coimbatore, India 2020; pp.06-07.Mar; 280-4.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICACCS48705.2020.9074172]
[18]
Jeong T, Mandal A. Flexible selecting of style to content ratio in neural style transfer. 17th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA) Orlando, FL, USA 2018; pp. 17-20.Dec; 264-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICMLA.2018.00046]
[19]
Blakeslee B, Ptucha R, Savakis A. FASTER ART-CNN: An extremely fast style transfer network. 2018 IEEE Western New York Image and Signal Processing Workshop (WNYISPW) Rochester, NY, USA 2018; pp. 05-05.Oct; 1-5.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/WNYIPW.2018.8576469]
[20]
Pugazhenthi A, Kumar LS. Selection of optimal number of clusters and centroids for k-means and fuzzy C-means clustering: A review. 5th International Conference on Computing, Communication and Security (ICCCS) Patna, India 2020; pp. 14.16 Oct; 1-4.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICCCS49678.2020.9276978]
[21]
Smith JR, Johnson LK. Advances in thoracic organ segmentation. J Med Imaging 2023; 45(3): 112-28.
[22]
Wang Q, Chen S, Zhang W. Distributed visual feature extraction for medical image segmentation. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2023; 37(5): 1987-99.
[23]
Li H, Liu Y. Dynamic clustering mechanism for thoracic organ segmentation in CT Images. Med Image Anal 2023; 28(4): 512-25.
[24]
Kim S, Lee H. Inception resNet: A deep learning approach for thoracic organ segmentation. Int J Comput Vis 2023; 78(2): 76-89.
[25]
Chen Z, Wu X. UNet-based thoracic organ segmentation in chest X-rays. Comput Med Imaging Graph 2023; 41(5): 33-47.
[26]
Zhang L, Wang Y. A novel approach to thoracic organ segmentation using deep learning. Med Phys 2023; 50(1): 22-35.
[27]
Patel R, Sharma A. Performance evaluation of distributed visual feature extraction in thoracic organ segmentation. J Healthc Eng 2023; 19(6): 334-48.
[28]
Yang C, Li M. Comparison of clustering algorithms for thoracic organ segmentation. Pattern Recognit Lett 2023; 62(9): 119-32.
[29]
Hu Q, Xu S. Enhancing inception resnet for thoracic organ segmentation with attention mechanisms. Comput Vis Image Underst 2023; 55(7): 102-15.
[30]
Liu H, Zhao Y. UNet++: A multimodal approach to thoracic organ segmentation. Med Image Comput Comput-Assisted Interv 2023; 36(8): 45-59.
[31]
SegTHOR: Segmentation of Thoracic Organs at Risk in CT images. Available from: https://paperswithcode.com/paper/segthor-segmentation-of-thoracic-organs-at (Accessed 20 Sep. 2023).

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy