Optimal Rituximab Monotherapy in Splenic Marginal Zone Lymphoma
(SMZL): A Case Report and Brief Review

Rong-Yan      Guan; Xing-Ru      Tang; Zou-Fang      Huang; Jun      Du; Xue-Hang      Fu; Guang      Lu; Wei-Wei      Mou

doi:10.2174/0115748928247369231024112003

Note! Please note that this article is currently in the "Article in Press" stage and is not the final "Version of record". While it has been accepted, copy-edited, and formatted, however, it is still undergoing proofreading and corrections by the authors. Therefore, the text may still change before the final publication. Although "Articles in Press" may not have all bibliographic details available, the DOI and the year of online publication can still be used to cite them. The article title, DOI, publication year, and author(s) should all be included in the citation format. Once the final "Version of record" becomes available the "Article in Press" will be replaced by that.

Abstract

Introduction: Splenic marginal zone Lymphoma (SMZL) is a rare, chronic B lymphocyte proliferative disease. Generally, SMZL is accompanied by circulating atypical villous lymphocytes, known as SMZL with villous lymphocytes. Rituximab is a chimeric monoclonal antibody to CD20; recent but limited studies have confirmed its effectiveness in treating SMZL. Given the low incidence and selection of treatment, statistical comparisons of rituximab monotherapy with other available treatment options with the full range of data from previous clinical studies remain sparse. Here, we report a case of SMZL with villous lymphocytes treated by rituximab monotherapy, which is especially infrequently reported.

Case Report: A 63-year-old Chinese female was presented to the hospital with complaints of splenomegaly and pain in the spleen area. Immunohistochemistry analysis was positive for IGH, IGK, and IGL clonal rearrangement. Villous lymphocytes were found in peripheral blood and bone marrow, along with further immunotyping results. The case was considered as SMZL with villous lymphocytes. Based on the SMZLSG prognosis assessment, we applied rituximab monotherapy. After eight cycles of rituximab treatment, the patient’s condition improved markedly, with blood constituent and size of the spleen returning to normal levels, achieving complete response, with no significant side effect observed.

Discussion: The patient provides a typical SMZL with villous lymphocytes case treated with rituximab monotherapy. Currently, the main treatment options include splenectomy and rituximab. After synthesizing a series of current views, we put forward our opinion about the selection of therapy for SMZL patients in order to gain maximum benefits for patients in need of treatment.

Conclusion: Our analysis found no statistically significant difference between rituximab monotherapy and rituximab combined with chemotherapy, while rituximab treatments resulted in better therapeutic effects than chemotherapy. Rituximab monotherapy has favorable therapeutic effects and minor adverse effects (AEs) in treating SMZL.

Rights & Permissions Print Cite

Journal Information

For Authors

For Editors

For Reviewers

Explore Articles

Open Access

Open Access Articles

For Visitors

DOI https://dx.doi.org/10.2174/0115748928247369231024112003	Print ISSN 1574-8928
Publisher Name Bentham Science Publisher	Online ISSN 2212-3970

Recent Patents on Anti-Cancer Drug Discovery

Optimal Rituximab Monotherapy in Splenic Marginal Zone Lymphoma (SMZL): A Case Report and Brief Review

Abstract Play Pause

Related Journals

Related Books

Abstract