Abstract
Background: There are many different factors that influence the process of microfiltration, including membrane pore size, pressure, temperature, and membrane origin. Studying the joint influence of technological parameters in order to justify rational modes of microfiltration is relevant.
Objective: This research aimed to define the rational technological parameters of microfiltration, which allow to achieve the target parameters of retentate in the process of obtaining micellar casein concentrate.
Methods: Standard and modified methods and techniques have been used in the process of experimental research. The mathematical processing was carried out by methods of mathematical statistics according to several trials data at three stage sequence.
Results: As a result of experimental investigations, the applicability of ceramic membranes for microfiltration of skim milk has been shown. The rational pore size has been established as 0,1 μm. To obtain the micellar casein concentrate, it is advisably to carry out the microfiltration of skim milk to the mass fraction of dry solids in concentrate (13 ± 3) %, followed by two-phase diafiltration with a double volume of reverse osmosis water. The rational operating conditions, allowing to get the target value of protein fractions correlation, have been established, as described as follows: input pressure as 0,2 – 0,3 MPa, and temperature as 10 – 15°С.
Conclusion: The analysis of microfiltration concentrates and permeates composition of raw milk, including vitamins and minerals content, showed both their high nutritional and biological value and the viability of further processing into food ingredients, including the ingredients for the specialized food products.
Graphical Abstract
[1]
Ponomarev AN, Melnikova EI, Stanislavskaya EB, Samoilova VN. Milk as a raw material for production of food ingredients Part 1. Fractionation of skimmed milk to obtain ingredients. Dairy Indus 2021; 1(64): 34-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.31515/1019-8946-2021-04-34-36]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.31515/1019-8946-2021-04-34-36]
[2]
Ahmad T, Aadil RM, Ahmed H, et al. Treatment and utilization of dairy industrial waste: A review. Trends Food Sci Technol 2019; 88: 361-72.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2019.04.003]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2019.04.003]
[3]
Zhao C, Chen N, Ashaolu TJ. Whey proteins and peptides in health-promoting functions - A review. Int Dairy J 2022; 126: 105269.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2021.105269]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2021.105269]
[4]
Wang M, Wang L, Lyu X, Hua X, Goddard JM, Yang R. Lactulose production from lactose isomerization by chemo-catalysts and enzymes: Current status and future perspectives. Biotechnol Adv 2022; 60: 108021.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2022.108021] [PMID: 35901861]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2022.108021] [PMID: 35901861]
[5]
Augustyniak A, Gottardi D, Giordani B, Gaffey J, Mc Mahon H. Dairy bioactives and functional ingredients with skin health benefits. J Funct Foods 2023; 104: 105528.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2023.105528]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2023.105528]
[6]
Berry CW, Murray B, Kenney WL. Scientific basis for a milk permeate-based sports drink – A critical review. Int Dairy J 2022; 127: 105296.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2021.105296]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2021.105296]
[7]
Volodin DN, Gridin AS, Evdokimov IA. Prospects of the production of dry protein ingredients based on the milk raw materials. Dairy Ind 2020; 1: 28-30.
[8]
Melnikova E, Stanislavskaya E, Bogdanova E, Shabalova E. Micellar casein production and application in dairy protein industry. Food Proc: Tech Technol 2022; 52(3): 592-601.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.21603/2074-9414-2022-3-2389]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.21603/2074-9414-2022-3-2389]
[9]
Hammam ARA, Beckman SL, Metzger LE. Production and storage stability of concentrated micellar casein. J Dairy Sci 2022; 105(2): 1084-98.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2021-21200] [PMID: 34955256]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2021-21200] [PMID: 34955256]
[10]
Xia X, Kelly AL, Tobin JT, et al. Effect of heat treatment on whey protein-reduced micellar casein concentrate: A study of texture, proteolysis levels and volatile profiles of Cheddar cheeses produced therefrom. Int Dairy J 2022; 129: 105280.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2021.105280]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2021.105280]
[11]
Salunke P, Metzger LE. Functional characteristics of process cheese product as affected by milk protein concentrate and micellar casein concentrate at different usage levels. Int Dairy J 2022; 128: 105324.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2022.105324]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2022.105324]
[12]
Hammam ARA, Kapoor R, Metzger LE. Manufacture of process cheese products without emulsifying salts using acid curd and micellar casein concentrate. J Dairy Sci 2023; 106(1): 117-31.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2022-22379] [PMID: 36357208]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2022-22379] [PMID: 36357208]
[13]
Carter BG, Cheng N, Kapoor R, Meletharayil GH, Drake MA. Invited review: Microfiltration-derived casein and whey proteins from milk. J Dairy Sci 2021; 104(3): 2465-79.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2020-18811] [PMID: 33455742]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2020-18811] [PMID: 33455742]
[14]
Liu Y, Zhang W, Hettinga K, Zhang L, Zhou P. Improving the microbial and nutritional quality of skim milk using microfiltration combined with thermal and nonthermal techniques. Int Dairy J 2022; 134: 105466.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2022.105466]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2022.105466]
[15]
Belna M, Ndiaye A, Taillandier F, Fernandez C, Agabriel L, Gésan-Guiziou G. Multiobjective optimization of skim milk microfiltration based on expert knowledge. Expert Syst Appl 2022; 205: 117624.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117624]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117624]
[16]
Kartashova EA, Sarvilina IV. The influence of Cytoflavin on molecular mechanisms of myocardial and vascular wall remodeling in patients with sistolic arterial hypertension. Kardiologiya i serdechno-sosudistaya khirurgiya 2018; 11(5): 40-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.17116/kardio20181105140]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.17116/kardio20181105140]
[17]
Gunkova PI, Gorbatova KK. Biotekhnologicheskie svoystva belkov moloka Milk Proteins Biotechnological Properties. St. Petersburg: GIORD 2015.
[19]
Tamim AI. Membrane Technologies in Production of Beverages and Dairy Products. St. Petersburg: Professiya 2016.
[20]
Hurt E, Barbano DM. Processing factors that influence casein and serum protein separation by microfiltration. J Dairy Sci 2010; 93(10): 4928-41.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2010-3121] [PMID: 20855027]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2010-3121] [PMID: 20855027]
[21]
Piry A, Heino A, Kühnl W, Grein T, Ripperger S, Kulozik U. Effect of membrane length, membrane resistance, and filtration conditions on the fractionation of milk proteins by microfiltration. J Dairy Sci 2012; 95(4): 1590-602.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2011-4292] [PMID: 22459807]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2011-4292] [PMID: 22459807]
[22]
Jørgensen CE, Abrahamsen RK, Rukke EO, Johansen AG, Schüller RB, Skeie SB. Optimization of protein fractionation by skim milk microfiltration: Choice of ceramic membrane pore size and filtration temperature. J Dairy Sci 2016; 99(8): 6164-79.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-11090] [PMID: 27265169]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-11090] [PMID: 27265169]
[23]
France TC, Kelly AL, Crowley SV, O’Mahony JA. The effects of temperature and transmembrane pressure on protein, calcium and plasmin partitioning during microfiltration of skim milk. Int Dairy J 2021; 114: 104930.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2020.104930]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2020.104930]
[24]
Reitmaier M, Bachmann I, Heidebrecht HJ, Kulozik U. Effect of changes in ionic composition induced by different diafiltration media on deposited layer properties and separation efficiency in milk protein fractionation by microfiltration. Int Dairy J 2021; 120: 105089.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2021.105089]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2021.105089]
[25]
Zhang S, Chen J, Pang X, et al. Pilot scale production of micellar casein concentrate using stainless steel membrane. Int Dairy J 2018; 80: 26-34.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2018.01.002]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2018.01.002]
[26]
Beckman SL, Barbano DM. Effect of microfiltration concentration factor on serum protein removal from skim milk using spiral-wound polymeric membranes. J Dairy Sci 2013; 96(10): 6199-212.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2013-6655] [PMID: 23891300]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2013-6655] [PMID: 23891300]
[27]
Hurt EE, Adams MC, Barbano DM. Microfiltration: Effect of retentate protein concentration on limiting flux and serum protein removal with 4-mm-channel ceramic microfiltration membranes. J Dairy Sci 2015; 98(4): 2234-44.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2014-9032] [PMID: 25682139]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2014-9032] [PMID: 25682139]
[28]
Adams MC, Barbano DM. Effect of ceramic membrane channel diameter on limiting retentate protein concentration during skim milk microfiltration. J Dairy Sci 2016; 99(1): 167-82.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-9897] [PMID: 26519975]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-9897] [PMID: 26519975]
[29]
Schopf R, Desch F, Schmitz R, Arar D, Kulozik U. Effect of flow channel number in multi-channel tubular ceramic microfiltration membranes on flux and small protein transmission in milk protein fractionation. J Membr Sci 2022; 644: 120153.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2021.120153]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2021.120153]
[30]
Schiffer S, Matyssek A, Hartinger M, Bolduan P, Mund P, Kulozik U. Effects of selective layer properties of ceramic multi-channel microfiltration membranes on the milk protein fractionation. Separ Purif Tech 2021; 259: 118050.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2020.118050]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2020.118050]
[31]
Carter B, DiMarzo L, Pranata J, Barbano DM, Drake M. Determination of the efficiency of removal of whey protein from sweet whey with ceramic microfiltration membranes. J Dairy Sci 2021; 104(7): 7534-43.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2020-18698] [PMID: 33814142]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2020-18698] [PMID: 33814142]
[32]
Carter B, DiMarzo L, Pranata J, Barbano DM, Drake M. Efficiency of removal of whey protein from sweet whey using polymeric microfiltration membranes. J Dairy Sci 2021; 104(8): 8630-43.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2020-18771] [PMID: 34099299]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2020-18771] [PMID: 34099299]
[33]
Hurt EE, Adams MC, Barbano DM. Microfiltration of skim milk and modified skim milk using a 0.1-µm ceramic uniform transmembrane pressure system at temperatures of 50, 55, 60, and 65°C. J Dairy Sci 2015; 98(2): 765-80.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2014-8775] [PMID: 25497798]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2014-8775] [PMID: 25497798]
[34]
Zulewska J, Newbold M, Barbano DM. Efficiency of serum protein removal from skim milk with ceramic and polymeric membranes at 50°C. J Dairy Sci 2009; 92(4): 1361-77.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2008-1757] [PMID: 19307617]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2008-1757] [PMID: 19307617]
[35]
Zulewska J, Barbano DM. Influence of casein on flux and passage of serum proteins during microfiltration using polymeric spiral-wound membranes at 50°C. J Dairy Sci 2013; 96(4): 2048-60.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-6032] [PMID: 23415517]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-6032] [PMID: 23415517]
[36]
Volodin DN, Shipulin VI, Evdokimov IA, Kulikova IK, Topalov VK. Micellar casein concentrate: Fractionation principle, properties and application possibilities. Dairy Indus 2022; (10): 44-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.31515/1019-8946-2022-10-44-48]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.31515/1019-8946-2022-10-44-48]
[37]
Tatarkanov AA, Alexandrov IA, Olejnik AV. Evaluation of the contact surface parameters at knurling finned heat-exchanging surface by knurls at ring blanks. Periód Tchê Quím 2020; 17(36): 372-89.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.52571/PTQ.v17.n36.2020.387_Periodico36_pgs_372_389.pdf]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.52571/PTQ.v17.n36.2020.387_Periodico36_pgs_372_389.pdf]
[38]
Granger-Delacroix M, Leconte N, Grassin C, et al. Skimmed milk microfiltration in diafiltration mode: Impact of solvent nature and concentration factor on spiral-wound membrane performance operated at low temperature. Separ Purif Tech 2023; 304: 122326.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2022.122326]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2022.122326]
[39]
Subhir S, McSweeney PLH, Fenelon MA, Tobin JT. Low temperature microfiltration of skim milk: Impact of membrane type, configuration and concentration factor on serum protein permeation efficiency. Int Dairy J 2023; 137: 105500.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2022.105500]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2022.105500]
[40]
Schiffer S, Vannieuwenhuyse L, Susianto C, Hartinger M, Kulozik U. Influence of pH and calcium concentration on milk protein fractionation by 0.1 μm microfiltration at low temperatures. Int Dairy J 2021; 118: 105048.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2021.105048]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2021.105048]
[41]
Heidebrecht HJ, Kulozik U. Fractionation of casein micelles and minor proteins by microfiltration in diafiltration mode. Study of the transmission and yield of the immunoglobulins IgG, IgA and IgM. Int Dairy J 2019; 93: 1-10.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2019.01.009]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2019.01.009]
