Abstract
Background: HAPPY (Humanity Assurance Protocol in Interventional Radiotherapy) reports the necessity for gynecological cancer patients to undergo interventional radiotherapy (IRT, also called brachytherapy). The present paper has evaluated how some precautions may improve the psychological well-being of the patients during IRT.
Methods: Patients with gynecological cancer undergoing IRT-HDR were analyzed. Patients answered three questionnaires before the IRT procedure (T0) and at the end of IRT (T1): Distress Thermometer (DT), Numerical Rating Scale for IRT procedure distress (NRS), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Correlations have been calculated pairwise through pandas. corrwith with a Pearson algorithm, and the p-values have been calculated through scipy.stats.pearsonr. Plots have been generated through seaborn and matplotlib. A Wilcoxon test was used.
Results: 55 patients were selected for this study. The median age of the patients was 64 (range, 39-84) years. 52 patients were with stage I endometrial cancer, whereas 3/3 patients with cervical cancer had locally advanced stages (IIB-IVA). 26 patients had a high education level (47.3%), and 38 were married or with a partner (69.1%). Only 14/55 (25.45%) patients were working. The HADS, DT, and NRS averages before the IRT procedure (T0) were 10.2, 3.8, and 4.3, respectively. After applying the HAPPY protocol, the HADS, DT, and NRS averages after IRT (T1) were 9.4, 3.4, and 2.6, respectively. The Wilcoxon signed rank test analysis showed a significant improvement in NRS (p < 0.00001) and HADS (p = 0.034). Living with a partner, parents or relatives was the only parameter statistically significantly associated with better DT pre-IRT (p = 0.04), HADS pre-IRT (p = 0.01), DT post-IRT (p = 0.01), and HADS post-IRT (p = 0.04).
Conclusion: In our study, the HAPPY protocol was associated with a significant reduction in patients’ distress, anxiety, and discomfort.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.05.003] [PMID: 28816136]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-11-121] [PMID: 23866850]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.23969] [PMID: 19016270]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001480] [PMID: 26583656]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2019.83137] [PMID: 30911310]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1188/12.ONF.354-360] [PMID: 22750893]
[PMID: 30314955]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.10.029] [PMID: 22044688]
[PMID: 22993365]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/gyno.2000.5799] [PMID: 10831342]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00002820-200302000-00001] [PMID: 12556707]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2013.223] [PMID: 23652312]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdq413] [PMID: 20870912]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2019.91222] [PMID: 31969908]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pon.930] [PMID: 15880387]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/sonu.2002.34084] [PMID: 12184045]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.27902] [PMID: 23423789]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x] [PMID: 6880820]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-015-0339-2] [PMID: 25657054]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-1-33] [PMID: 12952541]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.08.036] [PMID: 17027072]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.02.018] [PMID: 24721589]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11547-022-01455-y] [PMID: 35092552]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2020.92765] [PMID: 32190074]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12032-012-0263-3] [PMID: 22674154]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.07.033] [PMID: 25585781]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2020.04.061] [PMID: 32413527]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejim.2018.02.012] [PMID: 29477755]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pon.1171] [PMID: 17311247]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pon.537] [PMID: 11747061]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/135910703321649114] [PMID: 12804328]