Abstract
Background: This study performed a meta-analysis to compare the safety and efficacy of argon plasma coagulation (APC) concerning suture (SUT) and surgery (SUR).
Methods: The One-Way tests were applied, with p <0.05 significant. The value of R2 was analyzed (heterogeneity), and the risk of bias of articles was evaluated.
Results: A total of 34 studies were found, eight about APC, twenty about SUT, and six about SUR. For the percentage of Weight Loss Regained (%WLR), the means for APC, SUT, and SUR were 19.39 ± 10.94, 26.06 ± 16.71, and 17.05 ± 9.85, and for success rate (%SR), the means were 89.75 ± 16.75, 86.80 ± 11.44, and 76.00 ± 21.57, respectively with p >0.05, with R2 ≥ 50%.
Conclusion: The APC proved to be efficient and safe like the other techniques.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2011.10.026] [PMID: 22608371]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2015.12.030] [PMID: 26748219]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-017-2986-x] [PMID: 29082456]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-014-1363-2] [PMID: 25005812]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rgmx.2015.06.012] [PMID: 26552500]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cireng.2014.01.038] [PMID: 24814987]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-015-1657-z] [PMID: 25835983]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2012.199] [PMID: 23165161]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097] [PMID: 19621072]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/gut.52.1.34] [PMID: 12477756]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0016-5085(10)61783-0]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0640-y] [PMID: 19633885]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2009.12.011] [PMID: 20510293]
[PMID: 8081915]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2165-7904.1000264]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2020.03.3757] [PMID: 32217111]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-018-3229-5] [PMID: 29627948]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2019.12.036] [PMID: 31904378]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2020.07.013]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-122380] [PMID: 29253919]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2011.03.014] [PMID: 21640665]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0016-5085(11)60479-4]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2012.10.043] [PMID: 23142331]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-2989-1] [PMID: 23660724]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2009.04.002] [PMID: 19560979]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2011.10.016] [PMID: 22178565]
[PMID: 25380510]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-110771] [PMID: 26878054]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0016-5085(15)30597-7]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/108680810X12785289144197] [PMID: 20932372]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-011-0442-x] [PMID: 21604097]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2009.01.042] [PMID: 19555944]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2009.03.217] [PMID: 19632645]
[PMID: 26675939]