Abstract
Background: Cancer stem cells (CSCs) contribute to metastasis and drug resistance to immunotherapy in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), so the stemness evaluation of cancer cells is of great significance.
Method: The single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data of the GSE149655 dataset were collected and analyzed. Malignant cells were distinguished by CopyKAT. CytoTRACE score of marker genes in malignant cells was counted by CytoTRACE to construct the stemness score formula. Sample stemness score in TCGA was determined by the formula and divided into high-, medium- and low-stemness score groups. LASSO and COX regression analyses were carried out to screen the key genes related to the prognosis of LUAD from the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in high- and low-stemness score groups and a risk score model was constructed.
Result: Seven types of cells were identified from a total of 4 samples, and 193 marker genes of 3455 malignant cells were identified. There were 1098 DEGs between low- and high-stemness score groups of TCGA, of which CPS1, CENPK, GJB3, and TPSB2 constituted gene signatures. The 4-gene signature could independently evaluate LUAD survival in the training and validation sets and showed an acceptable area under the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves (AUCs).
Conclusion: This study provides insights into the cellular heterogeneity of LUAD and develops a new cancer stemness evaluation indicator and a 4-gene signature as a potential tool for evaluating the response of LUAD to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy or antineoplastic therapy.
Graphical Abstract
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660] [PMID: 33538338]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JTO.0b013e318206a221] [PMID: 21252716]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41419-017-0063-y] [PMID: 29371589]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30958-8] [PMID: 27574741]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-020-0823-9] [PMID: 32231294]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.604124] [PMID: 33505918]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2008.17.0266] [PMID: 18539963]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-020-02497-4] [PMID: 32867770]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2020.570702] [PMID: 33134315]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2020.00441] [PMID: 32431729]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2020.105144] [PMID: 32810627]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ccell.2021.07.004] [PMID: 34329587]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aax0249] [PMID: 31974247]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/omi.2011.0118] [PMID: 22455463]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41587-020-00795-2] [PMID: 33462507]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3337] [PMID: 25822800]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3612] [PMID: 24113773]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-18-0822] [PMID: 31043417]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0136-1] [PMID: 30127393]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.02.065] [PMID: 26997480]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature25501] [PMID: 29443960]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature20123] [PMID: 27806376]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2009.12.007] [PMID: 20074520]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108597] [PMID: 33406434]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms21093352] [PMID: 32397392]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2018.03.034] [PMID: 29625051]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/3558200] [PMID: 35530414]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm.2020.02.146] [PMID: 32355785]
[PMID: 35035680]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1582-4934.2011.01389.x] [PMID: 21777377]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PGPM.S331431] [PMID: 34785930]