Abstract
The development of new antipsychotics with pro-cognitive properties and less side effects represents a priority in schizophrenia drug research. In this study, we present for the first time a preclinical exploration of the effects of the promising natural atypical antipsychotic Methyl-2-Amino-3- Methoxybenzoate (MAM), a brain-penetrable protoalkaloid from the seed of the plant Nigella damascena. Using animal models related to hyperdopaminergic activity, namely the pharmacogenetic apomorphine (D2/D1 receptor agonist)-susceptible (APO-SUS) rat model and pharmacologically induced mouse and rat models of schizophrenia, we found that MAM reduced gnawing stereotypy and climbing behaviours induced by dopaminergic agents. This predicts antipsychotic activity. In line, MAM antagonized apomorphine-induced c-Fos and NPAS4 mRNA levels in post-mortem brain nucleus accumbens and dorsolateral striatum of APO-SUS rats. Furthermore, phencyclidine (PCP, an NMDA receptor antagonist) and 2,5-Dimethoxy-4-iodoamphetamine (DOI, a 5HT2A/2C receptor agonist) induced prepulse inhibition deficits, reflecting the positive symptoms of schizophrenia, which were rescued by treatment with MAM and atypical antipsychotics alike. Post-mortem brain immunostaining revealed that MAM blocked the strong activation of both PCP- and DOI-induced c-Fos immunoreactivity in a number of cortical areas. Finally, during a 28-day subchronic treatment regime, MAM did not induce weight gain, hyperglycemia, hyperlipidemia or hepato- and nephrotoxic effects, side effects known to be induced by atypical antipsychotics. MAM also did not show any cataleptic effects. In conclusion, its brain penetrability, the apparent absence of preclinical side effects, and its ability to antagonize positive and cognitive symptoms associated with schizophrenia make MAM an exciting new antipsychotic drug that deserves clinical testing.
Graphical Abstract
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.157.4.514] [PMID: 10739409]
[PMID: 2571717]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002130050017] [PMID: 10663410]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrd2806] [PMID: 19214197]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.2051-5545.2008.tb00154.x] [PMID: 18458771]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.60.1.82] [PMID: 12511175]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00606409] [PMID: 856603]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3223(01)01251-3] [PMID: 11743942]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3371/CSRP.4.1.5] [PMID: 20643630]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20221-0] [PMID: 33353947]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2022.106078] [PMID: 35026403]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s007020200033] [PMID: 11956961]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2165/00023210-200418040-00005] [PMID: 15015905]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40263-015-0278-3] [PMID: 26346901]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4321/S0213-61632009000200002]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tips.2012.06.006] [PMID: 22810174]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-3458.2003.tb00243.x] [PMID: 12595911]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0361-9230(90)90241-Q] [PMID: 2292046]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a033326] [PMID: 9613626]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002130100811] [PMID: 11549216]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(95)01379-2] [PMID: 8963658]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0361-9230(90)90288-B] [PMID: 2310946]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002130050334] [PMID: 9266615]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00213-006-0587-9] [PMID: 17031706]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.15-11-07604.1995] [PMID: 7472511]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2006.09.014] [PMID: 17079027]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2004.10.023] [PMID: 15670618]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16218-4] [PMID: 32393757]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0735-7044.114.6.1088] [PMID: 11142641]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10412905.2003.9712267]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11418-017-1166-6] [PMID: 29288328]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.08.001] [PMID: 26281720]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12245-009-0105-z] [PMID: 20157447]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/jcbfm.2012.126] [PMID: 22929442]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/thno.21254] [PMID: 29556336]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0091-3057(78)90088-6] [PMID: 209479]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pbb.2012.03.011] [PMID: 22469865]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3223(98)00356-4] [PMID: 10494453]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.09.002] [PMID: 15555679]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2007.12.032] [PMID: 18295409]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2010.04.002] [PMID: 20388545]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40473-014-0013-2] [PMID: 25215267]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.mp.4000575] [PMID: 10578232]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-23-08846.2000] [PMID: 11102493]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.07.028] [PMID: 27476436]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms23115968] [PMID: 35682647]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-058-4_10]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40473-014-0013-2] [PMID: 25215267]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbp006] [PMID: 19325164]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00008877-199512000-00010] [PMID: 11224388]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0735-7044.102.5.748] [PMID: 2904271]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2008.12.001] [PMID: 19110006]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pharmthera.2018.06.012]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2019.107704] [PMID: 31299229]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0014-2999(78)90251-0] [PMID: 28233]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0014-2999(80)90144-2] [PMID: 6108225]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0028-3908(89)90192-5] [PMID: 2554186]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0091-3057(84)80011-8] [PMID: 6096896]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-328X(00)00094-2] [PMID: 10891603]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/FBP.0b013e32801155a1] [PMID: 17110795]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0364-7722(79)90004-3]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02246956] [PMID: 7870905]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00008877-200006000-00006] [PMID: 11103877]