Login Register Cart 0
Generic placeholder image

Current Physical Chemistry

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 1877-9468
ISSN (Online): 1877-9476

Back
Journal Home About Journal Editorial Board Journal Insight Current Issue Volumes/Issues
Subscribe
Research Article

Why Thermodynamic Entropy and Statistical Entropy are Two Different Physical Quantities

Author(s): Andreas Paglietti*

Volume 13, Issue 3, 2023

Published on: 04 August, 2023

Page: [233 - 245] Pages: 13

DOI: 10.2174/1877946813666230622161503

Price: $65

Abstract

Background: Historically, the coincidence of classical thermodynamic entropy and statistical entropy is based on an assumption (the so-called Boltzmann-Planck relation). The study shows that the Boltzmann-Planck relation is not valid in general.

Aims: The study demonstrates that thermodynamic entropy is a physical entity distinct from statistical entropy.

Methods: Initially, the entropy of ideal gases is examined and demonstrated to be independent of the gas volume. The ideal gas's true entropy is then expressed correctly.

Results: The Boltzmann-Planck entropy equation is demonstrated to be incapable of describing the thermodynamic entropy of ideal gases.

Conclusion: In general, the Boltzmann-Planck entropy cannot be considered a statistical interpretation of the thermodynamic entropy. The two entropies represent two different physical quantities. The physical quantity that enters the second law of thermodynamics is the thermodynamic entropy, not the statistical entropy.

The study advocates for a fundamental rethinking of today's statistical understanding of thermodynamics.

« Previous Next »
Graphical Abstract

[1]
Zemansky, M.W.; Dittman, R.H. Heat and thermodynamics, 7th ed; McGraw-Hill: New York, 1997.
[2]
Mehra, J.; Rechenberg, H. The historical development of quantum theory, Vol. 1, pt.1, The quantum theory of Plank, Einstein, Bohr and Sommerfeld: Its foundation and the rise of its difficulties; Springer-Verlag: New York, 1982, pp. 1900-1925.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5783-7]
[3]
Styer, D.F. Insight into entropy. Am. J. Phys., 2000, 68(12), 1090-1096.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.1287353]
[4]
Swendsen, R.H. How physicists disagree on the meaning of entropy. Am. J. Phys., 2011, 79(4), 342-348.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.3536633]
[5]
Styer, D. Entropy as disorder: History of a misconception. Phys. Teach., 2019, 57, 454-458.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.5126822]
[6]
Swendsen, R.H. The ambiguity of “distinguishability” in statistical mechanics. Am. J. Phys., 2015, 83(6), 545-554.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.4906793]
[7]
Moore, T.A.; Schroeder, D.V. A different approach to introducing statistical mechanics. Am. J. Phys., 1997, 65(1), 26-36.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.18490]
[8]
Lambert, F.L. Disorder–A cracked crutch for supporting entropy discussions. J. Chem. Educ., 2002, 79(2), 187-192.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ed079p187]
[9]
Paglietti, A. Planck’s experiment on gas mixing, Gibbs’ paradox and the definition of entropy in statistical mechanics. Phys. Lett. A, 2019, 383(10), 936-941.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2018.12.020]
[10]
Paglietti, A. Thermodynamic limit to the existence of inanimate and living systems; Sepco-Acerten: Milano, Italy, 2014.
[11]
Paglietti, A. Limits to anaerobic energy and cytosolic concentration in the living cell. Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlin. Soft Matter Phys., 2015, 92(5), 052712.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.92.052712] [PMID: 26651728]
[12]
Paglietti, A. Limit to steady-state aerobic power of skeletal muscles. J. Biol. Phys., 2018, 44(4), 619-646.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10867-018-9510-y] [PMID: 30280281]
[13]
Paglietti, A. Pippard, Elements of classical thermodynamics; CUP: Cambridge, U.K, 2016.
[14]
Sears, F.W.; Salinger, G.L. Thermodynamics, Kinetic theory, and Statistical mechanics, 3re ed.; Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA, 1978.
[15]
Reif, F. Fundamentals of statistical and thermal physics; Waveland Press: Long Grove, IL, 2009.
[16]
Kreuzer, H.J. Nonequilibrium thermodynamics and its statistical foundations; Clarendon Press: Oxford, 1984, p. 3.
[17]
Fast, J.D. Entropy, 2nd ed; Macmillan: London, 1968.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15380-0]
[18]
Tsallis, C. What should a statistical mechanics satisfy to reflect nature? Physica D, 2004, 193(1-4), 3-34.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physd.2004.01.006]
[19]
Tsallis, C. Introduction to Nonextensive Statistical Mechanics: Approaching a Complex World, 2nd ed; Springer: New York, 2022.
[20]
Paños, F.J.; Pérez, E. Sackur–Tetrode equation in the lab. Eur. J. Phys., 2015, 36(5), 055033-055048.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/36/5/055033]

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy