Abstract
Introduction: Maintenance therapy aimed to strengthen the first-line chemotherapy and improve quality of life is needed for gastric cancer (GC). Currently, many clinical studies have confirmed the important role of fluoropyrimidine in the maintenance stage. Our team has created patented prescriptions “Fuzheng jiedu Quyu Method” recipe (FJQR), which was considered as an adjuvant therapeutic scheme (reduce toxicity and increase the efficacy of chemotherapy). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FJQR combined with fluoropyrimidine as a maintenance treatment in HER-2 negative GC patients.
Methods: We performed the analysis of 129 patients with HER-2 negative GC who entered the maintenance stage in our hospital and Tianjin Cancer Hospital between January 2018 and December 2020. Out of the 129 eligible patients, 64 were categorized into the maintenance treatment group with FJQR+fluoropyrimidine, and 65 patients were assigned to the control group if they received fluoropyrimidine alone. Capecitabine was orally 1000mg/m2, Qd, half an hour after meals, and FGQR was 15g Bid after capecitabine. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), overall remission rate (ORR), quality of Life (QOL), TCM syndrome and safety.
Results: The mPFS in the treatment group was significantly prolonged compared with the control group (6.3 vs. 5.0 months, p = 0.03), while the mOS was not substantially improved (11.4 vs. 10.5 months, p = 0.38). Gastrointestinal symptoms and pain became better in the treatment group. The number of distant metastatic organs, first-line chemotherapy cycles, and lymph node metastasis were independent risk predictors for PFS. Blood stasis syndrome may be the protective factor. In terms of safety, treatment-related adverse events (AEs) in the treatment group were relatively lighter, and the incidence of grade III-IV AEs could be significantly reduced.
Conclusion: FJQR and fluoropyrimidine have synergistic effects as maintenance treatment in HER-2 negative GC, with good efficacy and safety.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3322/caac.21708] [PMID: 35020204]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000002108] [PMID: 35143424]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.949941] [PMID: 36457494]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3322/caac.21657] [PMID: 33592120]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbcan.2021.188549] [PMID: 33894300]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10147-020-01711-z] [PMID: 32494981]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2217/fon-2020-0421] [PMID: 32539457]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S172710] [PMID: 30310315]
[PMID: 28850174]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00692-6] [PMID: 35030335]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JTO.0b013e318267cf84]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.21.01332] [PMID: 34533973]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctrv.2015.10.012] [PMID: 26608114]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103307] [PMID: 33753249]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm.2019.02.03] [PMID: 31032279]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.5582/bst.2015.01019] [PMID: 25787906]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000020081] [PMID: 32384478]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phymed.2021.153575] [PMID: 33984593]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2017.11.012] [PMID: 29609923]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phymed.2021.153722] [PMID: 34488188]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/5739909] [PMID: 35281608]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12094-020-02379-7]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmgh.2017.03.003] [PMID: 28560289]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jgo.2015.06.002] [PMID: 26228711]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.20.00892] [PMID: 33197226]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-5498-3] [PMID: 30922323]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15593258211055016] [PMID: 34790081]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S218214] [PMID: 31571996]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.5582/bst.2018.01144] [PMID: 30012913]