Abstract
Background: In older patients, prevention of acute respiratory tract infections (RTIs) is challenging. Experimental studies have consistently underlined an immune-potentiating effect of the bacterial lysates product OM85, on both cellular and humoral responses.
Objective: This work aimed to assess the potential efficacy of OM-85 for RTIs’ prevention in older individuals.
Methods: This explorative longitudinal study included 24 patients aged 65 years or older recruited in the GeroCovid Observational Study- home and outpatient care cohort. For the study purposes, we included 8 patients treated with OM-85 from December 2020 to June 2021 (group A), and a control group of 16 patients, matched for sex and age, who did not receive bacterial lysates (group B). RTIs were recorded from the participants’ medical documentation in an e-registry from March 2020 to December 2021.
Results: In 2020, group A experienced a total of 8 RTIs, which affected 6 out of 8 patients (75%); group B reported 21 RTIs, with at least one event in 11 out of 16 patients (68.7%). In 2021, RTIs affected 2 out of 8 patients (25%) in group A (p < 0.02), and 13 out of 16 patients (81.2%) in group B (within this group, 5 patients had two RTIs). The RTIs' cumulative incidence over the observation period significantly differed between groups (66.7% in group A vs. 24.3% in group B; p < 0.002), as well as the decrease in RTIs frequency from 2020 to 2021. No patients in group A were affected by COVID-19 during the observation period, while among controls, two patients had SARS-CoV-2 infection, notwithstanding three doses of vaccine.
Conclusion: This study suggests that bacterial lysates may provide clinical benefits for preventing RTIs. Additional research involving larger cohorts is required to verify the effectiveness of OM-85 in preventing RTIs in older adults.
Graphical Abstract
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1003057] [PMID: 23326226]
[PMID: 24275566]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/08923978909082140]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000195827] [PMID: 2122507]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1378/chest.103.6.1783] [PMID: 8404101]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0012.7216] [PMID: 30460909]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/alr.22276] [PMID: 30615298]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00545] [PMID: 32582669]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coph.2012.01.019] [PMID: 22365728]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/09031936.94.07030446] [PMID: 8013600]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejim.2021.01.017] [PMID: 33573885]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12603-020-1357-9] [PMID: 32346677]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.36150/2499-6564-N440]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000516969] [PMID: 34182557]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.13981] [PMID: 33405321]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.17925/ERPD.2019.5.1.17]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-150] [PMID: 24773830]