Abstract
Background: Customers expect quality, uninterrupted power with cost-effective electricity in the latest trend. However, outages, severe storms, old infrastructure, and cost pressures can lead to ambiguity in power generation and transmission. To improve line power transmission capability, the right flexible AC transmission systems (FACTS) device may save millions of dollars.
Methods: In this study, a FACTS controller named Optimal Generalized Interline Power Flow Controller (OGIPFC) was developed. Furthermore, for optimization, the Modified Marine Predator Algorithm (MMPA), which is a modification of the recently developed Marine Predator Algorithm (MPA). The optimum technique was used to evaluate a set of prioritized considered objective minimizations. A variety of factors must be maximized, such as generation cost, emissions, and power loss.
Results: The performance of the proposed algorithm was analysed on benchmark test functions, and then single objective optimization problems of standard IEEE-30 bus system were solved and compared with the existing algorithms. The proposed algorithm was restricted to solving the single objective problem only, so it was further implemented with non-dominating sorting to solve the multiobjective optimization problem. The proposed multi-objective version is named as Non-dominating Sorting Modified Marine Predator Algorithm (NSMMPA), and it was validated on benchmark test functions and the IEEE-30 bus system.
Conclusion: Finally, the OPF problem was solved with the incorporation of OGIPFC using the proposed methods, which resulted in better solutions and made the system more effective in operation.
Graphical Abstract
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/en15114063]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/en13215679]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256050] [PMID: 34383821]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12065-021-00649-z]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2017.04.048]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conengprac.2017.02.010]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1135-2_32]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3103/S1068371217010059]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2016.01.005]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3167026]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3160714]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TII.2021.3067719]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106252]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2011.09.027]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15325008.2013.769033]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00202-014-0315-0]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/en11092270]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3906/elk-1106-10]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v13i1.pp1060-1077]