Login Register Cart 0
Generic placeholder image

Current Nutrition & Food Science

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 1573-4013
ISSN (Online): 2212-3881

Back
Journal Home About Journal Editorial Board Journal Insight Current Issue Volumes/Issues
Subscribe
Research Article

Total and Partial Replacement of Meat by Mycoprotein in Hamburger: Physico-Chemical, Nutritional, Mechanical, and Overall Acceptability

Author(s): Fataneh Hashempour-Baltork, Parastou Farshi, Behrooz Jannat, Manouchehr Dadgarnejad, Ramin Asgharian, Kianoush Khosravi-Darani* and Hedayat Hosseini*

Volume 20, Issue 3, 2024

Published on: 09 June, 2023

Page: [349 - 356] Pages: 8

DOI: 10.2174/1573401319666230418104833

Price: $65

Abstract

Aim: Processed meats are considered the most consumable products worldwide. However, there are several limitations related to these products such as health and environmental issues, and the high energy, time, and cost needed for their production, thus manufacturers are looking for effective alternatives for processed meats. Mycoprotein can be a useful approach for meat substitution.

Introduction: This study’s objective was the partial and total replacement of meat with mycoproteins in the formulation of burgers and to investigate the characteristics of these novel formulations for comparison with the control sample (full meat burger).

Methods: Cooking loss, mechanical, physicochemical, nutritional, color, and sensory properties were determined.

Results: The results indicated that mycoprotein substitution could improve health and nutritional properties as a result of including high-value protein and lower lipid content (mostly unsaturated fatty acids). However, the beef burger had better mechanical properties such as cohesiveness, hardness, springiness, and gumminess compared to mycoprotein-containing burgers. Higher OBC (oil binding capacity) and WBC (water binding capacity) of mycoprotein were responsible for filling the interstitial spaces within the protein matrix and reducing the textural attributes. Thus, using less oil and water in mycoprotein-containing formulations is recommended. Moreover, the cooking loss percentage decreased by increasing the mycoprotein content of burgers, which has economic advantages. According to sensory evaluations, no significant changes (p>0.05) were shown in the overall acceptance and taste scores of the burgers.

Conclusions: Mycoproteins are potential compounds to be used as promising ingredients for the complete substitution of meat in the burger.

« Previous Next »
Graphical Abstract

[1]
Amani H, Rigi S, Shahrokhisahne B. Processed meat products: health issues and attempts toward healthier food. Int J Agric Sci Vet Med 2017; 5: 1-9.
[2]
Zeng L. Trends in processed meat, unprocessed red meat, poultry, and fish consumption in the United States, 1999-2016. J Acad Nutr Diet 2019; 119(7): 1085-1098.e12.
[3]
Tilman D, Clark M. Global diets link environmental sustainability and human health. Nature 2014; 515(7528): 518-22.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature13959] [PMID: 25383533]
[4]
Kamani MH, Meera MS, Bhaskar N, Modi VK. Partial and total replacement of meat by plant-based proteins in chicken sausage: evaluation of mechanical, physico-chemical and sensory characteristics. J Food Sci Technol 2019; 56(5): 2660-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13197-019-03754-1] [PMID: 31168148]
[5]
Upadhyaya S. Microbial protein: A valuable component for future food security Microbes and environmental management. New Delhi: Studium Press 2016; p. 8.
[6]
Hashempour-Baltork F, Khosravi-Darani K, Hosseini H, Farshi P, Reihani SFS. Mycoproteins as safe meat substitutes. J Clean Prod 2020; 253: 119958.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.119958]
[7]
FDA, U, Marlow Foods GRAS Notification for Mycoprotein.Stokesley (UK): Marlow Foods Ltd. 2002. Available from : https://www.cspinet.org/sites/default/files/attachment/quornltr.pdf
[8]
Derbyshire EJ, Delange J. Fungal protein–what is it and what is the health evidence? A systematic review focusing on mycoprotein. Front Sustain Food Syst 2021; 5: 581682.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2021.581682]
[9]
Hashempour-Baltork F, Hosseini SM, Assarehzadegan MA, Khosravi-Darani K, Hosseini H. Safety assays and nutritional values of mycoprotein produced by fusarium venenatum IR372C from date waste as substrate. J Sci Food Agric 2020; 100(12): 4433-41. b
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.10483] [PMID: 32406520]
[10]
Colosimo R, Warren FJ, Finnigan TJA, Wilde PJ. Protein bioaccessibility from mycoprotein hyphal structure: In vitro investigation of underlying mechanisms. Food Chem 2020; 330: 127252.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.127252] [PMID: 32585587]
[11]
Colosimo R, Warren FJ, Edwards CH, Finnigan TJA, Wilde PJ. The interaction of α-amylase with mycoprotein: Diffusion through the fungal cell wall, enzyme entrapment, and potential physiological implications. Food Hydrocoll 2020; 108: 106018.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2020.106018]
[12]
AOCS, official methods and recommended practices of the aocs,reapproved 2017 2017. Available from : https://www.aocs.org/attain-lab-services/methods/methods/search-results?subject=B
[13]
Serdaroğlu M, Kavuşan HS, İpek G, Öztürk B. Evaluation of the quality of beef patties formulated with dried pumpkin pulp and seed. Han-gug Chugsan Sigpum Hag-hoeji 2018; 38(1): 1-13.
[PMID: 29725220]
[14]
Valls F, Sancho MT, Fernández-Muiño MA, Checa MA. Determination of vitamin B(6) in cooked sausages. J Agric Food Chem 2001; 49(1): 38-41.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf0003202] [PMID: 11170557]
[15]
Sasaki K, Hatate H, Tanaka R. determination of 13 vitamin B and the related compounds using HPLC with UV detection and application to food supplements. Chromatographia 2020; 83(7): 839-51.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10337-020-03902-2]
[16]
Czauderna M, Kowalczyk J, Niedźwiedzka K, Wąsowska I. A highly efficient method for determination of some amino acids and glutathione by liquid chromatography. J Anim Feed Sci 2003; 12(1): 199-215.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.22358/jafs/67697/2003]
[17]
Folch J, Lees M, Stanley GHS. A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipides from animal tissues. J Biol Chem 1957; 226(1): 497-509.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(18)64849-5] [PMID: 13428781]
[18]
Hashempour-Baltork F, Torbati M, Azadmard-Damirchi S, Peter Savage G. Chemical, rheological and nutritional characteristics of sesame and olive oils blended with linseed oil. Adv Pharm Bull 2018; 8(1): 107-13.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/apb.2018.013] [PMID: 29670845]
[19]
Hashempour-Baltork F, Torbati M, Azadmard-Damirchi S, Savage GP. Quality properties of sesame and olive oils incorporated with flaxseed oil. Adv Pharm Bull 2017; 7(1): 97-101.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/apb.2017.012] [PMID: 28507942]
[20]
Carvalho Barros J, Munekata PES, de Carvalho FAL, et al. Use of tiger nut (Cyperus esculentus L.) oil emulsion as animal fat replacement in beef burgers. Foods 2020; 9(1): 44.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods9010044] [PMID: 31947797]
[21]
Kyriakopoulou K, Dekkers B, van der Goot AJ. Plant-based meat analogues Sustainable meat production and processing. Elsevier 2019; pp. 103-26.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-814874-7.00006-7]
[22]
Finnigan TJA, Wall BT, Wilde PJ, Stephens FB, Taylor SL, Freedman MR. Mycoprotein: The future of nutritious nonmeat protein, a symposium review. Curr Dev Nutr 2019; 3(6): 3006010.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzz021] [PMID: 31187084]
[23]
Choi YS, Choi JH, Han DJ, et al. Characteristics of low-fat meat emulsion systems with pork fat replaced by vegetable oils and rice bran fiber. Meat Sci 2009; 82(2): 266-71.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2009.01.019] [PMID: 20416740]
[24]
Damodaran S, Parkin KL. Amino acids, peptides, and proteins Fennema’s food chemistry. CRC Press 2017; pp. 235-356.
[25]
Scollan N, Hocquette JF, Nuernberg K, Dannenberger D, Richardson I, Moloney A. Innovations in beef production systems that enhance the nutritional and health value of beef lipids and their relationship with meat quality. Meat Sci 2006; 74(1): 17-33.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.05.002] [PMID: 22062713]
[26]
USDA Processed, Prepared USDA National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference, Release. 2008. Available from :[https://www. ars.usda.gov/ARSUserFiles/80400535/DATA/sr21/sr21_doc.pdf
[27]
Le H, Ting L, Jun C, Weng W. Gelling properties of myofibrillar protein from abalone (Haliotis Discus Hannai Ino) muscle. Int J Food Prop 2018; 21(1): 277-88.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10942912.2018.1454463]
[28]
Youssef MK, Barbut S. Effects of two types of soy protein isolates, native and preheated whey protein isolates on emulsified meat batters prepared at different protein levels. Meat Sci 2011; 87(1): 54-60.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2010.09.002] [PMID: 20875930]
[29]
Bohrer BM. An investigation of the formulation and nutritional composition of modern meat analogue products. Food Sci Hum Wellness 2019; 8(4): 320-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fshw.2019.11.006]
[30]
Akesowan A. Quality characteristics of light pork burgers fortified with soy protein isolate. Food Sci Biotechnol 2010; 19(5): 1143-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10068-010-0163-2]

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy