Generic placeholder image

Current Nutrition & Food Science

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 1573-4013
ISSN (Online): 2212-3881

Review Article

A Review of Cultured Meat and its Current Public Perception

Author(s): Nurhaziqah Awang Ahmad, Fareeha Arshad, Siti Nurul Azian Zakaria and Minhaz Uddin Ahmed*

Volume 19, Issue 9, 2023

Published on: 28 March, 2023

Page: [928 - 944] Pages: 17

DOI: 10.2174/1573401319666230227115317

Price: $65

Abstract

Culturing meat in-vitro cell, also known as cellular agriculture, is an alternative to livestock meat production. By culturing meat instead of relying on conventional meat, the deleterious effects on the environment can be avoided. Moreover, depending on cultured meat resources will help improve animal welfare and aid in tackling the current sustainability challenges associated with animal rearing to produce meat. Multiple tissue culture methods and bioengineering techniques are currently being studied to design various cell types to develop muscle and fat cells for culturing meat. To succeed in the cellular agricultural industry, the public impression of cultured meat must also be considered. To better study and understand cultured meat perception among the public, we extensively studied papers on ‘cultured meat’ and ‘public perception’ from the past decade. Most recent research studies have discussed the public perception of a particular group toward cultured meat. However, to the best of our knowledge, no existing article provides a detailed study on recent advances in cultured meat and the views of public consumers from different backgrounds. Thus, this paper focuses on several religious and regional groups and their perceptions of cultured meat consumption. The consumers’ appeal and acceptability of cultured meat are crucial to manufacturing cultured meat. However, many existing studies on public perception of cultured meat have raised concerns despite their willingness to consume it. Therefore, organisations must carefully navigate for such an industry to reach its full potential. For instance, labels like ‘lab-grown meat’, ‘cultured meat’, or ‘artificial meat’ may elicit negative customer responses. On the contrary, tags like ‘clean meat’ or ‘healthy meat’ may promote better acceptance among consumers. Further research and development, especially on the alternative of serum-free culture media, cultured meat, and cellular agriculture, can transform the meat industry soon.

Graphical Abstract

[1]
Dumont B, Fortun-Lamothe L, Jouven M, Thomas M, Tichit M. Prospects from agroecology and industrial ecology for animal production in the 21st century. Animal 2013; 7(6): 1028-43.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1751731112002418] [PMID: 23257276]
[2]
van der Weele C, Tramper J. Cultured meat: every village its own factory? Trends Biotechnol 2014; 32(6): 294-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2014.04.009] [PMID: 24856100]
[3]
Post MJ, Levenberg S, Kaplan DL, et al. Scientific, sustainability and regulatory challenges of cultured meat. Nat Food 2020; 1(7): 403-15.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s43016-020-0112-z]
[4]
Post MJ. Cultured meat from stem cells: Challenges and prospects. Meat Sci 2012; 92(3): 297-301.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.04.008] [PMID: 22543115]
[5]
Hoek AC, Luning PA, Weijzen P, Engels W, Kok FJ, de Graaf C. Replacement of meat by meat substitutes. A survey on person- and product-related factors in consumer acceptance. Appetite 2011; 56(3): 662-73.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2011.02.001] [PMID: 21315123]
[6]
Marcu A, Gaspar R, Rutsaert P, et al. Analogies, metaphors, and wondering about the future: Lay sense-making around synthetic meat. Public Underst Sci 2015; 24(5): 547-62.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0963662514521106] [PMID: 24553438]
[7]
Verbeke W, Sans P, Van Loo EJ. Challenges and prospects for consumer acceptance of cultured meat. J Integr Agric 2015; 14(2): 285-94.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(14)60884-4]
[8]
Asioli D, Fuentes-Pila J, Han J, et al. European consumer valuation for cultured meat: A multi-country investigation. Agricultural and Applied Economics Association (AAEA) Conferences 2021 Annual Meeting, August 1-3, Austin, Texas 2021.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.22004/AG.ECON.312687]
[9]
Chriki S, Hocquette JF. The myth of cultured meat: A review. Front Nutr 2020; 7: 7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2020.00007] [PMID: 32118026]
[10]
Sato K. Cultured meat production technology: Challenges and future development. Global Start Stud Inst Rep 2020; 1-6.
[11]
Stephens N, Di Silvio L, Dunsford I, Ellis M, Glencross A, Sexton A. Bringing cultured meat to market: Technical, socio-political, and regulatory challenges in cellular agriculture. Trends Food Sci Technol 2018; 78: 155-66.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2018.04.010] [PMID: 30100674]
[12]
Szejda K, Bryant CJ, Urbanovich T. US and UK consumer adoption of cultivated meat: A segmentation study. Foods 2021; 10(5): 1050.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods10051050] [PMID: 34064740]
[13]
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Global Livestock Environmental Assessment Model (GLEAM). Available from: https://www.fao.org/gleam/dashboard-old/en/
[14]
Capper JL. The environmental impact of beef production in the United States: 1977 compared with 2007. J Anim Sci 2011; 89(12): 4249-61.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/jas.2010-3784] [PMID: 21803973]
[15]
Cederberg C, Persson UM, Neovius K, Molander S, Clift R. Including carbon emissions from deforestation in the carbon footprint of Brazilian beef. Environ Sci Technol 2011; 45(5): 1773-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es103240z] [PMID: 21280649]
[16]
Peters GM, Rowley HV, Wiedemann S, Tucker R, Short MD, Schulz M. Red meat production in australia: life cycle assessment and comparison with overseas studies. Environ Sci Technol 2010; 44(4): 1327-32.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es901131e] [PMID: 20067280]
[17]
Xu X, Sharma P, Shu S, et al. Global greenhouse gas emissions from animal-based foods are twice those of plant-based foods. Nat Food 2021; 2(9): 724-32.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s43016-021-00358-x]
[18]
Springmann M, Clark M, Mason-D’Croz D, et al. Options for keeping the food system within environmental limits. Nature 2018; 562(7728): 519-25.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0594-0] [PMID: 30305731]
[19]
DeFries RS, Rudel T, Uriarte M, Hansen M. Deforestation driven by urban population growth and agricultural trade in the twenty-first century. Nat Geosci 2010; 3(3): 178-81.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ngeo756]
[20]
Ripple WJ, Smith P, Haberl H, Montzka SA, McAlpine C, Boucher DH. Ruminants, climate change and climate policy. Nat Clim Chang 2014; 4(1): 2-5.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2081]
[21]
Chan DSM, Lau R, Aune D, et al. Red and processed meat and colorectal cancer incidence: meta-analysis of prospective studies. PLoS One 2011; 6(6): e20456.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020456] [PMID: 21674008]
[22]
Larsson SC, Wolk A. Meat consumption and risk of colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis of prospective studies. Int J Cancer 2006; 119(11): 2657-64.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijc.22170] [PMID: 16991129]
[23]
Song Y, Manson JE, Buring JE, Liu S. A prospective study of red meat consumption and type 2 diabetes in middle-aged and elderly women: the women’s health study. Diabetes Care 2004; 27(9): 2108-15.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/diacare.27.9.2108] [PMID: 15333470]
[24]
Key TJ, Davey GK, Appleby PN. Health benefits of a vegetarian diet. Proc Nutr Soc 1999; 58(2): 271-5.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0029665199000373] [PMID: 10466166]
[25]
CDC. Estimates of Foodborne Illness in the United States 2014. https://www.cdc.gov/foodborneburden/index.html (accessed on 6th July 2022).
[26]
Pimentel D, Pimentel M. Sustainability of meat-based and plant-based diets and the environment. Am J Clin Nutr 2003; 78(3): 660S-3S.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/78.3.660S] [PMID: 12936963]
[27]
Rubio NR, Xiang N, Kaplan DL. Plant-based and cell-based approaches to meat production. Nat Commun 2020; 11(1): 6276.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20061-y] [PMID: 33293564]
[28]
Melzener L, Verzijden KE, Buijs AJ, Post MJ, Flack JE. Cultured beef: from small biopsy to substantial quantity. J Sci Food Agric 2021; 101(1): 7-14.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.10663] [PMID: 32662148]
[29]
Chriki S, Ellies-Oury MP, Hocquette JF. Is “cultured meat” a viable alternative to slaughtering animals and a good comprise between animal welfare and human expectations? Anim Front 2022; 12(1): 35-42.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/af/vfac002] [PMID: 35311183]
[30]
van Vliet S, Bain JR, Muehlbauer MJ, et al. A metabolomics comparison of plant-based meat and grass-fed meat indicates large nutritional differences despite comparable Nutrition Facts panels. Sci Rep 2021; 11(1): 13828.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93100-3] [PMID: 34226581]
[31]
Bonny SPF, Gardner GE, Pethick DW, Hocquette JF. Artificial meat and the future of the meat industry. Anim Prod Sci 2017; 57(11): 2216.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/AN17307]
[32]
Geay Y, Bauchart D, Hocquette JF, Culioli J. Effect of nutritional factors on biochemical, structural and metabolic characteristics of muscles in ruminants, consequences on dietetic value and sensorial qualities of meat. Reprod Nutr Dev 2001; 41(1): 1-26.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/rnd:2001108] [PMID: 11368241]
[33]
Balasubramanian B, Liu W, Pushparaj K, Park S. The epic of in vitro meat production—a fiction into reality. Foods 2021; 10(6): 1395.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods10061395] [PMID: 34208720]
[34]
Zhang H, Liu Y, Yao S, et al. A multicolor sensing system for simultaneous detection of four foodborne pathogenic bacteria based on Fe3O4/MnO2 nanocomposites and the etching of gold nanorods. Food Chem Toxicol 2021; 149: 112035.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2021.112035] [PMID: 33548372]
[35]
Bhat ZF, Kumar S, Fayaz H. In vitro meat production: Challenges and benefits over conventional meat production. J Integr Agric 2015; 14(2): 241-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(14)60887-X]
[36]
Signs of Life: Bio art and beyond.. Choice Reviews Online 2008; 45(9)
[http://dx.doi.org/10.5860/CHOICE.45-4782]
[37]
Benjaminson MA, Gilchriest JA, Lorenz M. In vitro edible muscle protein production system (mpps): stage 1, fish. Acta Astronaut 2002; 51(12): 879-89.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0094-5765(02)00033-4] [PMID: 12416526]
[38]
Edelman PD, McFarland DC, Mironov VA, Matheny JG. Commentary: In vitro-cultured meat production. Tissue Eng 2005; 11(5-6): 659-62.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/ten.2005.11.659] [PMID: 15998207]
[39]
Cultured meat – A timeline. Available from: https://culturedmeats.com.au/cultured-meat-a-timeline/
[40]
Bryant CJ. Culture, meat, and cultured meat. J Anim Sci 2020; 98(8): skaa172.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaa172] [PMID: 32745186]
[41]
GFI. Alternative Protein Company Database 2021. https://gfi.org/resource/alternative-protein-company-database (accessed on 6th July 2022).
[42]
Slingenbergh. World Livestock 2013. Changing Disease Landscapes. 2013. https://www.fao.org/3/i3440e/i3440e06.pdf (accessed on 6th July 2022)
[43]
Greger M. The human/animal interface: emergence and resurgence of zoonotic infectious diseases. Crit Rev Microbiol 2007; 33(4): 243-99.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10408410701647594] [PMID: 18033595]
[44]
Slingenbergh J, Gilbert M, Balogh de K, Wint W. Ecological sources of zoonotic diseases. Rev Sci Tech 2004; 23(2): 467-84.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.20506/rst.23.2.1492] [PMID: 15702714]
[45]
Oliver SP, Murinda SE, Jayarao BM. Impact of antibiotic use in adult dairy cows on antimicrobial resistance of veterinary and human pathogens: a comprehensive review. Foodborne Pathog Dis 2011; 8(3): 337-55.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/fpd.2010.0730] [PMID: 21133795]
[46]
Scollan ND, Dannenberger D, Nuernberg K, et al. Enhancing the nutritional and health value of beef lipids and their relationship with meat quality. Meat Sci 2014; 97(3): 384-94.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.02.015] [PMID: 24697921]
[47]
Dilworth T, McGregor A. Moral Steaks? ethical discourses of in vitro meat in Academia and Australia. J Agric Environ Ethics 2015; 28(1): 85-107.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10806-014-9522-y]
[48]
Hocquette JF. Is in vitro meat the solution for the future? Meat Sci 2016; 120: 167-76.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.04.036] [PMID: 27211873]
[49]
Hampton JO, Hyndman TH, Allen BL, Fischer B. Animal harms and food production: Informing ethical choices. Animals 2021; 11(5): 1225.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11051225] [PMID: 33922738]
[50]
Hopkins PD, Dacey A. Vegetarian meat: could technology save animals and satisfy meat eaters? J Agric Environ Ethics 2008; 21(6): 579-96.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10806-008-9110-0]
[51]
Bredahl L, Grunert KG, Fertin C. Relating consumer perceptions of pork quality to physical product characteristics. Food Qual Prefer 1998; 9(4): 273-81.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0950-3293(98)00007-X]
[52]
Verbeke W, Van Wezemael L, de Barcellos MD, et al. European beef consumers’ interest in a beef eating-quality guarantee. Appetite 2010; 54(2): 289-96.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2009.11.013] [PMID: 19961887]
[53]
Claeys E, De Smet S, Balcaen A, Raes K, Demeyer D. Quantification of fresh meat peptides by SDS–PAGE in relation to ageing time and taste intensity. Meat Sci 2004; 67(2): 281-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2003.11.001] [PMID: 22061325]
[54]
Mottram DS. Flavour formation in meat and meat products: a review. Food Chem 1998; 62(4): 415-24.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(98)00076-4]
[55]
Morell V. Meat-eaters may speed worldwide species extinction, study warns. Science 2015; 11.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aad1607]
[56]
Ben-Arye T, Levenberg S. Tissue engineering for clean meat production. Front Sustain Food Syst 2019; 3: 46.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2019.00046]
[57]
Mizukami A, Swiech K. Mesenchymal stromal cells: from discovery to manufacturing and commercialization. Stem Cells Int 2018; 2018: 1-13.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/4083921] [PMID: 30057622]
[58]
Siddiqui SA, Khan S, Murid M, et al. Marketing strategies for cultured meat: a review. Appl Sci 2022; 12(17): 8795.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/app12178795]
[59]
Zhang G, Zhao X, Li X, Du G, Zhou J, Chen J. Challenges and possibilities for bio-manufacturing cultured meat. Trends Food Sci Technol 2020; 97: 443-50.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2020.01.026]
[60]
Sharma S, Thind SS, Kaur A. In vitro meat production system: why and how? J Food Sci Technol 2015; 52(12): 7599-607.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13197-015-1972-3] [PMID: 26604337]
[61]
Fraeye I, Kratka M, Vandenburgh H, Thorrez L. Sensorial and nutritional aspects of cultured meat in comparison to traditional meat: much to be inferred. Front Nutr 2020; 7: 35.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2020.00035] [PMID: 32266282]
[62]
Williams LA, Davis-Dusenbery BN, Eggan KC. SnapShot: directed differentiation of pluripotent stem cells. Cell 2012; 149(5): 1174-1174.e1.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.05.015] [PMID: 22632979]
[63]
Aswad H, Jalabert A, Rome S. Depleting extracellular vesicles from fetal bovine serum alters proliferation and differentiation of skeletal muscle cells in vitro. BMC Biotechnol 2016; 16(1): 32.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12896-016-0262-0] [PMID: 27038912]
[64]
Brunner D, Frank J, Appl H, Schöffl H, Pfaller W, Gstraunthaler G. Serum-free cell culture: the serum-free media interactive online database. Altern Anim Exp 2010; 27(1): 53-62.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.14573/altex.2010.1.53] [PMID: 20390239]
[65]
van der Valk J, Brunner D, De Smet K, et al. Optimization of chemically defined cell culture media – Replacing fetal bovine serum in mammalian in vitro methods. Toxicol In Vitro 2010; 24(4): 1053-63.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2010.03.016] [PMID: 20362047]
[66]
Wosczyna MN, Rando TA. A muscle stem cell support group: coordinated cellular responses in muscle regeneration. Dev Cell 2018; 46(2): 135-43.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2018.06.018] [PMID: 30016618]
[67]
Franceković P, García-Torralba L, Sakoulogeorga E, Vučković T, Perez-Cueto FJA. How do consumers perceive cultured meat in Croatia, Greece, and Spain? Nutrients 2021; 13(4): 1284.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu13041284] [PMID: 33919705]
[68]
Malavalli MM, Hamid N, Kantono K, Liu Y, Seyfoddin A. Consumers’ perception of in-vitro meat in new zealand using the theory of planned behaviour model. Sustainability 2021; 13(13): 7430.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su13137430]
[69]
Bryant C, Szejda K, Parekh N, Deshpande V, Tse B. A survey of consumer perceptions of plant-based and clean meat in the USA, India, and China. Front Sustain Food Syst 2019; 3: 11.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2019.00011]
[70]
Mancini MC, Antonioli F. Exploring consumers’ attitude towards cultured meat in Italy. Meat Sci 2019; 150: 101-10.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.12.014] [PMID: 30616073]
[71]
Tucker CA. The significance of sensory appeal for reduced meat consumption. Appetite 2014; 81: 168-79.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2014.06.022] [PMID: 24953197]
[72]
Laestadius LI, Caldwell MA. Is the future of meat palatable? Perceptions of in vitro meat as evidenced by online news comments. Public Health Nutr 2015; 18(13): 2457-67.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1368980015000622] [PMID: 25818555]
[73]
Goodwin JN, Shoulders CW. The future of meat: A qualitative analysis of cultured meat media coverage. Meat Sci 2013; 95(3): 445-50.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.05.027] [PMID: 23793078]
[74]
Hopkins PD. Cultured meat in western media: The disproportionate coverage of vegetarian reactions, demographic realities, and implications for cultured meat marketing. J Integr Agric 2015; 14(2): 264-72.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(14)60883-2]
[75]
Wilks M, Phillips CJC. Attitudes to in vitro meat: A survey of potential consumers in the United States. PLoS One 2017; 12(2): e0171904.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171904] [PMID: 28207878]
[76]
Hocquette A, Lambert C, Sinquin C, et al. Educated consumers don’t believe artificial meat is the solution to the problems with the meat industry. J Integr Agric 2015; 14(2): 273-84.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(14)60886-8]
[77]
van der Weele C, Driessen C. Emerging profiles for cultured meat; ethics through and as design. Animals 2013; 3(3): 647-62.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani3030647] [PMID: 26479525]
[78]
Vinnari M, Tapio P. Future images of meat consumption in 2030. Futures 2009; 41(5): 269-78.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2008.11.014]
[79]
Bekker GA, Fischer ARH, Tobi H, van Trijp HCM. Explicit and implicit attitude toward an emerging food technology: The case of cultured meat. Appetite 2017; 108: 245-54.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2016.10.002] [PMID: 27717657]
[80]
Slade P. If you build it, will they eat it? Consumer preferences for plant-based and cultured meat burgers. Appetite 2018; 125: 428-37.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2018.02.030] [PMID: 29501683]
[81]
O’Keefe L, McLachlan C, Gough C, Mander S, Bows-Larkin A. Consumer responses to a future UK food system. Br Food J 2016; 118(2): 412-28.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-01-2015-0047]
[82]
Siegrist M, Sütterlin B, Hartmann C. Perceived naturalness and evoked disgust influence acceptance of cultured meat. Meat Sci 2018; 139: 213-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.02.007] [PMID: 29459297]
[83]
Hamdan MN, Post MJ, Ramli MA, Mustafa AR. Cultured meat in islamic perspective. J Relig Health 2018; 57(6): 2193-206.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10943-017-0403-3] [PMID: 28456853]
[84]
Kantor BN, Kantor J. Public attitudes and willingness to pay for cultured meat: a cross-sectional experimental study. Front Sustain Food Syst 2021; 5: 594650.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2021.594650]
[85]
Weinrich R, Strack M, Neugebauer F. Consumer acceptance of cultured meat in Germany. Meat Sci 2020; 162: 107924.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2019.107924] [PMID: 31732401]
[86]
Ruzgys S, Pickering GJ. Perceptions of cultured meat among youth and messaging strategies. Front Sustain Food Syst 2020; 4: 122.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.00122]

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy