Abstract
Aim: The aim of the study is to check whether dyngo-4a can inhibit neuroblastoma (NB) proliferation and induce NB cell differentiation
Background: Dynamin plays a role in regulating neurotransmission, signaling pathways, nutrient uptake, and pathogen infection, enhancing cell proliferation, tumor invasion, and metastasis. Studies have reported that dyngo-4a, a dynamin inhibitor, can be used to identify potential biomarkers and promising novel therapeutic targets for cancer treatment.
Objective: To our knowledge, no published reports are showing that dynamin inhibitors can reduce NB cell proliferation and induce differentiation. In this study, we report that dyngo-4a can inhibit NB proliferation and induce NB cell differentiation.
Methods: In this study, mouse neuroblastoma (Neuro-2a) cells were cultured in the presence or absence of dyngo-4a or retinoic acid (RA), or in the presence of both dyngo-4a and RA, or in the presence of sequential administration of dyngo-4a and RA to compare the effects on the inhibition of cell proliferation and effects on neuroblastoma cell differentiation induction. The neural cell markers, Nestin and Tuj 1 (Neuron-specific class III beta-tubulin), were used to demonstrate that the differentiated cells have neuronal cell features. The phosphorylation of Protein Kinase B (AKT), extracellular signalregulated kinases1/2 (ERK1/2), and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) were determined to examine the potential mechanisms of induced differentiation.
Results: Dyngo-4a or RA or dyngo-4a with subsequent RA administration induced Neuro-2a cell differentiation. However, RA with subsequent dyngo-4a administration results in almost total death of the Neuro-2a cells. The differentiation rate induced by dyngo-4a was significantly higher than the rate by RA treatment (72.5 ± 1.4% vs. 52.9 ± 3.1% with neuron features, P<0.05; 39.0 ± 0.8% vs. 29.9 ± 1.8% for axons under light microscopy, p<0.05). The differentiation rate of cells treated with dyngo-4a first, followed by RA, was greater than when they were added together (74.8 ± 3.8% vs. 10.6 ± 3.6%; 45.5 ± 1.6% vs. 12.4 ± 0.6%, p<0.01). Co-administration of dyngo-4a and RA at the same time diminished differentiation efficacy significantly. Dyngo-4a induced Neuro-2a cell differentiation and increased Tuj-1 positive staining by the 6th day post- treatment. Dyngo-4a also inhibited Neuro-2a cell proliferation in a dose-dependent manner. Regarding the mechanism, dyngo-4a treatment showed a significant increase in p-AKT and p-ERK1/2 but not in p-EGFR.
Conclusion: At a level comparable to RA, dynamin inhibition with dyngo-4a lowers proliferation and causes differentiation of Neuro-2a mouse NB cells in vitro. The AKT pathway is activated by dynago- 4a, which results in differentiation. The combination of RA with dynago-4a reduces the efficiency of differentiation. The application of dynago-4a followed by RA, on the other hand, enhances the differentiating effect, implying alternative mechanistic roles in the process.
Graphical Abstract
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1208494] [PMID: 15735700]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ccell.2020.08.014] [PMID: 32946775]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/med.21750] [PMID: 33155698]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2020.09.023] [PMID: 33007410]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.06.125] [PMID: 22766505]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00001756-200401190-00020] [PMID: 15106839]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2012.09.014] [PMID: 23022267]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3835(03)00108-3] [PMID: 12880980]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2007.13.8925] [PMID: 19171716]
[PMID: 2846152]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M412553200] [PMID: 15572353]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1471-4159.1996.67030927.x] [PMID: 8752097]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.16678] [PMID: 28402939]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells11162557] [PMID: 36010634]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cl.23967] [PMID: 23538558]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.138578] [PMID: 24046449]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.11.118] [PMID: 24316215]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.10.105] [PMID: 19857461]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocel.2013.10.008] [PMID: 24387844]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2006.04.002] [PMID: 16740485]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/hsz-2018-0257] [PMID: 30067507]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes9020115] [PMID: 29466320]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12964-015-0102-1] [PMID: 25889964]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tra.12119] [PMID: 24025110]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cellsig.2009.01.036] [PMID: 19385050]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.00401] [PMID: 12668729]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/09553002.2015.1029595] [PMID: 25912236]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00702-006-0500-z] [PMID: 16715208]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/97898150400741220101]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00044-013-0582-8]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2013.12.008]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2018.04.001] [PMID: 29649739]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.82939]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.02.045] [PMID: 17321499]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jnr.10848] [PMID: 14705145]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/156800908783497113] [PMID: 18288945]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2008.06.012] [PMID: 18694561]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.1711] [PMID: 24658031]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuro.2008.11.001] [PMID: 19056420]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12640-011-9291-6] [PMID: 22095091]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1107-12.2012] [PMID: 22723706]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.147850] [PMID: 25563324]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/ijbs.3.263] [PMID: 17505539]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1200164109] [PMID: 22371560]
[PMID: 21225506]