Generic placeholder image

Letters in Organic Chemistry

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 1570-1786
ISSN (Online): 1875-6255

Letter Article

How Medium Affects the Activity and Stereopreference of Thermoanaerobacter ethanolicus Secondary Alcohol Dehydrogenase Catalyzed Reduction of Ketones

Author(s): Ibrahim Karume*, Simon Bbumba and Simon Tewolde

Volume 20, Issue 5, 2023

Published on: 07 December, 2022

Page: [395 - 400] Pages: 6

DOI: 10.2174/1570178620666221021103540

Price: $65

Abstract

The activity and selectivity of W110G Thermoanaerobacter ethanolicus secondary alcohol dehydrogenase were altered by cosubstrate and cosolvent at varying temperatures. A sharp drop in the enantiomeric excess (ee) was observed at 60°C in the first 3 h, suggesting increased selectivity mistakes in the reduction of 4-phenyl-2-butanone to the expected (S)-4-phenyl-2-butanol using 5% v/v of 2-propanol as a cosubstrate. The ee increased exponentially with cosubstrate concentration, reaching ≥94% with 30-70% v/v 2-propanol. However, a decrease in enzyme activity was noticed at ≥30% v/v 2-propanol by a sharp drop in conversion. The lowest ee (<3%) was registered using 5% v/v 2- propanol at 30-40°C, which prolonged enzyme life that allowed reversible redox reaction with selectivity mistakes to give the R-alcohol compared to ≥18% ee at 50-60°C, where faster reaction rates promoted selectivity mistake, but enzyme life was shortened by protein denaturation at the elevated temperatures. Water-miscible and immiscible organic cosolvents (25% v/v) increased enzyme selectivity. For methanol, ethanol, ethylene glycol and tert-butanol, the activity/conversion decreased with an increase in pKa and log P while the stereoselectivity/ee increased.

Graphical Abstract

[1]
Gross, M.; Cartwright, A.; Campbell, B.; Bolton, R.; Holmes, K.; Robert, J.L. Drug Inf. J., 1993, 193, 453-457.
[2]
Cotzias, G.C.; Van Woert, M.H.; Schiffer, L.M. N. Engl. J. Med., 1967, 276(7), 374-379.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJM196702162760703] [PMID: 5334614]
[3]
Guo, Z.; Chen, Y.; Goswami, A.; Hanson, R.L.; Patel, R.N. Tetrahedron Asymmetry, 2006, 17, 1589-1602.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tetasy.2006.05.027]
[4]
Patel, R.C.L.; Nanduri, V.; Jianqing, L.; Kotnis, A.; Parker, W.; Liu, M.; Mueller, R. Tetrahedron Asymmetry, 2005, 16, 2778-2783.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tetasy.2005.07.015]
[5]
Fujita, T.; Hatamoto, H.; Iwasaki, T.; Takafuji, S-I. Phytochemistry, 1995, 39(5), 1085-1089.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0031-9422(95)00102-D]
[6]
Shibata, N.; Katoh, T.; Terashima, S. Tetrahedron Lett., 1997, 38(4), 619-620.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0040-4039(96)02406-9]
[7]
Musa, M.M.; Phillips, R.S. Catal. Sci. Technol., 2011, 1(8), 1311-1323.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c1cy00160d]
[8]
Prelog, V. Pure Appl. Chem., 1964, 9(1), 119-130.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1351/pac196409010119]
[9]
Burdette, D.; Zeikus, J.G. Biochem. J., 1994, 302(1), 163-170. http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/bj3020163 PMID: 8068002
[10]
Keinan, E.; Hafeli, E.K.; Seth, K.K.; Lamed, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1986, 108(1), 162-169.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja00261a026]
[11]
Musa, M.M.; Phillips, R.S.; Laivenieks, M.; Vieille, C.; Takahashi, M.; Hamdan, S.M. Org. Biomol. Chem., 2013, 11(17), 2911-2915.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c3ob27415b] [PMID: 23525226]
[12]
Musa, M.M. Phillips; Ibrahim, K.; Takahashi, M.; Hamdan, S.M; Nisar, U. ChemistrySelect, 2018, 3, 10205-10208.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/slct.201801673]
[13]
Chin, J.T.; Wheeler, S.L.; Klibanov, A.M. Biotechnol. Bioeng., 1994, 44(1), 140-145.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bit.260440120] [PMID: 18618457]
[14]
Singer, S.J. Adv. Protein Chem., 1963, 17, 1-68.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0065-3233(08)60051-0]
[15]
Yang, H.; Jönsson, Å.; Wehtje, E.; Adlercreutz, P.; Mattiasson, B. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Gen. Subj., 1997, 1336(1), 51-58.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4165(97)00010-X] [PMID: 9271250]

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy