Abstract
Background: Systematic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmunemediated disease. So far, there is no relevant report on ferroptosis in SLE research, and the role of T helper 1 (Th1) and T helper 2 (Th2) cells in SLE is still unclear.
Methods: This study employed SLE mice models with and without ferroptosis inhibitors (Liproxstatin‑1) and normal control mice. Treated mice were analyzed with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining, immunohistochemical detection of glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4), malondialdehyde (MDA) detection, ELISA(enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) detection of Th1 and Th2 cytokines and flow cytometry detection of Th1 and Th2 ratio.
Results: The results showed that compared with the normal group, the SLE group exhibited significantly higher expression of anti-double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid (anti-dsDNA), MDA and Th1 cytokines, significantly lower expression of GPX4 and Th2 cytokines and increased Th1/Th2 ratio. Similarly, compared with the SLE group, the SLE + liproxstatin-1 group showed significantly low expression of anti-dsDNA, MDA and Th1 cytokines, significantly high expression of GPX4 and Th2 cytokines and reduced Th1/Th2 ratio.
Conclusion: These results demonstrate that ferroptosis may be involved in promoting SLE development. Therefore, inhibiting ferroptosis may be a potential treatment for SLE. Similarly, the Th1/Th2 ratio may have a role in promoting SLE development.
Keywords: SLE, Th1/Th2, ferroptosis, GPX4, mice model, Th1/Th2 ratio.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-019-05299-2] [PMID: 31531779]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1756-185X.12462] [PMID: 25524656]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjms.2018.06.022] [PMID: 30360802]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1651-2227.2010.01771.x]
[PMID: 29224679]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1566524019666190424130809] [PMID: 31032751]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0961203311426568] [PMID: 22065092]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaut.2011.08.001] [PMID: 21880464]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1529-0131(199908)42:8<1644::AID-ANR12>3.0.CO;2-L] [PMID: 10446863]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1603244113] [PMID: 27506793]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2019.01.039] [PMID: 30684867]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41419-020-2334-2] [PMID: 32094346]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.14511] [PMID: 31232522]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acschemneuro.9b00539] [PMID: 31682397]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/cdd.2015.158] [PMID: 26794443]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2013.12.010] [PMID: 24439385]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1705-2] [PMID: 31634900]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.13008] [PMID: 27860262]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1170-y] [PMID: 31043744]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bmc.4087] [PMID: 28869288]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.03.042] [PMID: 22632970]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00018-016-2194-1] [PMID: 27048822]
[PMID: 12946237]
[PMID: 28804539]
[PMID: 29138867]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cyto.2012.11.023] [PMID: 23332615]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.100293] [PMID: 20682672]