Login Register Cart 0
Generic placeholder image

Recent Innovations in Chemical Engineering

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 2405-5204
ISSN (Online): 2405-5212

Back
Journal Home About Journal Editorial Board Journal Insight Current Issue Volumes/Issues
Subscribe
Research Article

Mass Transfer of Olanzapine in the Liquid Lamellar Phases Formed by the Self-assembly of Glycerol Monooleate (GMO): Experimental Data and Mathematical Modeling

Author(s): Mehdi Khanali and Gita Bagheri*

Volume 15, Issue 4, 2022

Published on: 19 September, 2022

Page: [233 - 246] Pages: 14

DOI: 10.2174/2405520415666220427075819

Price: $65

Abstract

Aim: The present study aimed to optimise the formulation of Olanzapine (OZ)-loaded liquid lamellar phase by using Response Surface Methodology (RSM).

Background: In this study, poly (2-ethyl-2-oxazoline) (PEOZ) was selected to modify liquid lamellar phases. The OZ was released from the phases mainly through swelling and diffusion-controlled mechanism simultaneously.

Objective: Additionally, two types of mathematical models, based on the lumped and diffusion approaches, were presented for the diffusional release of OZ from the liquid lamellar phases, the second of which was solved with an analytical solution. The controlled release profiles of the models were compared with the in vitro experimental release profiles.

Methods: Further, the Box-Behnken experimental design was employed to design the liquid lamellar phase with the three factors, including the weight ratio of water/GMO (w/w) (X1) and PEOZ/GMO (w/w) (X2), and the percentage of OZ (X3). The liquid lamellar phases were prepared based on the top-down method, followed by fragmentation by sonication. Furthermore, the diffusion coefficients of the liquid lamellar phases were calculated, and the effects of variables were evaluated on particle size and diffusion coefficient, as well as the constant of the lumped model.

Results: The results revealed an increase in particle size following an enhancement in water level in the liquid lamellar phases, as well as less aggregation with the addition of PEOZ.

Conclusion: The generated model was validated by comparing the experimental data and predicted model values graphically, the results of which represented compatibility between the lumped model and experimental data.

Keywords: Mass transport, Response surface methodology, Particle size, lumped model, Diffusion model.

« Previous Next »
Graphical Abstract

[1]
Lee P I. Modeling of drug release from matrix systems involving moving boundaries: Approximate analytical solutions. Int J Pharm 2011; 418(1): 18-27.
[2]
Lao LL, Peppas NA, Boey FYC, Venkatraman SS. Modeling of drug release from bulk-degrading polymers. Int J Pharm 2011; 418(1): 28-41.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2010.12.020] [PMID: 21182912]
[3]
Sackett CK, Narasimhan B. Mathematical modeling of polymer erosion: Consequences for drug delivery. Int J Pharm 2011; 418(1): 104-14.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2010.11.048] [PMID: 21130849]
[4]
Grassi M, Voinovich D, Franceschinis E, Perissutti B, Filipovic-Grcic J. Theoretical and experimental study on theophylline release from stearic acid cylindrical delivery systems. J Control Release 2003; 92(3): 275-89.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-3659(03)00330-4] [PMID: 14568409]
[5]
Grassi M, Voinovich D, Moneghini M, Franceschinis E, Perissutti B, Filipovic-Grcic J. Preparation and evaluation of a melt pelletised paracetamol/stearic acid sustained release delivery system. J Control Release 2003; 88(3): 381-91.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-3659(03)00011-7] [PMID: 12644364]
[6]
Sagalowicz L, Leser M, Watzke H, Michel M. Monoglyceride self-assembly structures as delivery vehicles. Trends Food Sci Technol 2006; 17(5): 204-14.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2005.12.012]
[7]
Chandran S, Asghar LFA, Mantha N. Design and evaluation of ethyl cellulose based matrix tablets of ibuprofen with pH modulated release kinetics. Indian J Pharm Sci 2008; 70(5): 596-602.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0250-474X.45397] [PMID: 21394255]
[8]
Frenning G, Strømme M. Drug release modeled by dissolution, diffusion, and immobilization. Int J Pharm 2003; 250(1): 137-45.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-5173(02)00539-2] [PMID: 12480280]
[9]
Faisant N, Siepmann J, Richard J, Benoit JP. Mathematical modeling of drug release from bioerodible microparticles: effect of gamma-irradiation. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 56(2): 271-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0939-6411(03)00104-8] [PMID: 12957642]
[10]
Wu XY, Zhou Y. Finite element analysis of diffusional drug release from complex matrix systems. II. Factors influencing release kinetics. J Control Release 1998; 51(1): 57-71.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-3659(97)00159-4] [PMID: 9685904]
[11]
Conte U, Colombo P, Gazzaniga A, Sangalli ME, La Manna A. Swelling-activated drug delivery systems. Biomaterials 1988; 9(6): 489-93.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0142-9612(88)90043-9] [PMID: 3224135]
[12]
Colombo P, Bettini R, Catellani PL, Santi P, Peppas NA. Drug volume fraction profile in the gel phase and drug release kinetics in hydroxypropylmethyl cellulose matrices containing a soluble drug. Eur J Pharm Sci 1999; 9(1): 33-40.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0928-0987(99)00039-1] [PMID: 10493994]
[13]
Grassi M, Lapasin R, Carli F. 27th International Symposium on Controlled Release of Bioactive Materials and the Third Consumer and Diversified Products Conference: proceedings book 2000:. Paris, France, Palais de Congrès, Porte Maillot. July 7-13, 2000; 748-9.
[14]
Cussler EL. Diffusion: Mass transfer in fluid systems. (3rd ed.), New York: Cambridge university press 1997.
[15]
Xu H, Liu L, Li X, Ma J, Liu R, Wang S. Extended tacrolimus release via the combination of lipid-based solid dispersion and HPMC hydrogel matrix tablets. Asian J Pharm 2019; 14(4): 445-54.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajps.2018.08.001] [PMID: 32104473]
[16]
Siepmann J, Siepmann F. Modeling of diffusion controlled drug delivery. J Control Release 2012; 161(2): 351-62.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2011.10.006] [PMID: 22019555]
[17]
Eid M, Sobhy R, Zhou P, Wei X, Wu D, Li B. β-cyclodextrin- soy soluble polysaccharide based coreshell bionanocomposites hydrogel for vitamin E swelling controlled delivery. Food Hydrocoll 2020; 104: 1-13.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2020.105751]
[18]
Vaibhav R, Pragya Y, Arif H, Anurag V. Effect of hydrophilic and hydrophobic polymerson permeation of S-amlodipine besylate throughintercalated polymeric transdermal matrix: 3(2) designing, optimization and characterization. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2019; 45(4): 1-46.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03639045.2019.1569035]
[19]
Grassi M, Grassi G. Mathematical modelling and controlled drug delivery: Matrix systems. Curr Drug Deliv 2005; 2(1): 97-116.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1567201052772906] [PMID: 16305412]
[20]
Siepmann J, Siepmann F, Florence AT. Local controlled drug delivery to the brain: Mathematical modeling of the underlying mass transport mechanisms. Int J Pharm 2006; 314(2): 101-19.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2005.07.027] [PMID: 16647231]
[21]
Choiri S, Sulaiman TNS, Rohman A. Assessment of the effect of polymers combination and effervescent component on the drug release of swellable gastro-floating tablet formulation through compartmental modeling-based approach. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2020; 46(1): 146-58.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03639045.2019.1711387] [PMID: 31894720]
[22]
Siepmann J, Peppas NA. Modeling of drug release from delivery systems based on hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC). Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2001; 48(2-3): 139-57.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-409X(01)00112-0] [PMID: 11369079]
[23]
Higuchi T. Mechanism of sustained-action medication: Theoritical analysis of rate of release of solid drugs dispersed in solid matrices. J Pharm Sci 1963; 52(12): 1145-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jps.2600521210] [PMID: 14088963]
[24]
Korsmeyer RW, Lusting SR, Peppas NA. Solute and penatrate diffusion in swellable polymers. I. Mathematical modelling. J Polym Sci, B, Polym Phys 1986; 24(2): 395-408.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/polb.1986.090240214]
[25]
Crank J. The mathematics of diffusion. Clarendon Press 1975.
[26]
Wellytton Q, Valdiney S, Geraldo M, et al. Mathematical modeling of thin-layer drying kinetics of piper aduncum l. leaves. J Agric Sci (Toronto) 2019; 11(8): 225-35.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/jas.v11n8p225]
[27]
Roy DS, Rohera BD. Comparative evaluation of rate of hydration and matrix erosion of HEC and HPC and study of drug release from their matrices. Eur J Pharm Sci 2002; 16(3): 193-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0928-0987(02)00103-3] [PMID: 12128174]
[28]
Haifei H, Ju Y, Yingxin Z, et al. Solid lipid nanoparticles as a drug delivery system to across the blood-brain barrier. Biochem Bioph Res Co 2019; 519(2): 385-90.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2019.09.017]
[29]
Lee PI. Determination of Diffusion Coefficient by Sorption from Constant Finite Volume Controlled Release of Bioactive Materials. New York 1980; pp. 135-53.
[30]
Arifin DY, Lee LY, Wang C-H. Mathematical modeling and simulation of drug release from microspheres: Implications to drug delivery systems. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2006; 58(12-13): 1274-325.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2006.09.007] [PMID: 17097189]

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
Article Metrics
1
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy