Abstract
Background: The exact mechanism of acute pancreatitis (AP), which is an inflammation of the pancreas, still remains unclear.
Objective: In this study, we examined the protein phosphorylation changes during the early stage of AP in mice using proteomic analysis.
Methods: AP model in mice was constructed using an intraperitoneal injection of cerulein. Blood samples and pancreas were collected at 1, 3, 6, 9h after the final injection (n=3 at each time point). Samples collected 3h after the final injection were separately mixed and named S (saline group) and C1 (cerulein group); samples collected 6h after the final injection from the cerulein group were mixed and named C2. Proteins from S, C1, and C2 were extracted, digested by trypsin, and subjected to LC-MS/MS analysis, bioinformatics analysis, and Western blotting.
Results: A total of 549 sites (426 proteins) were upregulated, and 501 sites (367 proteins) were downregulated in C1 compared to S; while 491 phosphorylation sites (377 proteins) were upregulated and 367 sites (274 proteins) were downregulated in C2 compared to S. Motif analysis showed that proline-directed kinase and basophilic kinase had a key role during early AP. During an early AP stage, the cellular distributions of proteins slightly changed. The types of domains changed with the development of AP. Phosphorylation proteins associated with calcium signaling, especially IP3R mediated calcium release, lysosome and autophagosome pathway, pancreatic digestive activation, and secretion, were found to be involved in the development of early AP independent of NF-kB activation. Moreover, the MAPK family was found to have a greater impact at the early stage of AP. We also found differentially expressed phosphorylations of amylase and trypsinogen and increased phosphorylation of MAPK6 S189 in early AP.
Conclusion: IP3R mediated calcium release and activation of MAPK family are key events promoting the development of early AP.
Keywords: Proteomic analysis, phosphorylation, acute pancreatitis, pancreas, digestive enzymes, TMT label.
Graphical Abstract
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000001030] [PMID: 29629907]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pan.2016.05.001] [PMID: 27282980]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.183434.111] [PMID: 22302935]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M301945200] [PMID: 12657634]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2017.10.012] [PMID: 29074451]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceca.2016.04.007] [PMID: 27229361]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/ajpgi.90452.2008] [PMID: 18845574]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2017.10.018] [PMID: 29079517]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12664-016-0647-y] [PMID: 27206712]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/febs.13629] [PMID: 26683671]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2003.11.017] [PMID: 14762792]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pan.2018.08.006] [PMID: 30150111]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2018.8819] [PMID: 29620213]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MOG.0b013e3283567f52] [PMID: 22885948]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/gut.2010.226175] [PMID: 21471572]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-2-16] [PMID: 12102727]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M113.478800] [PMID: 23814066]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1172/JCI12874] [PMID: 11696584]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/pr200990b] [PMID: 22276854]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.5b00398] [PMID: 26265067]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4889(96)00083-3] [PMID: 8982275]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2013.36] [PMID: 23507798]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1519384112] [PMID: 26512112]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.redox.2015.01.014] [PMID: 25778551]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/auto.8839] [PMID: 19458481]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1172/JCI38674] [PMID: 19805911]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1172/JCI9411] [PMID: 10995788]