Abstract
Background: Many natural and synthetic flavonoids have been studied and documented by inhibiting aromatase enzymes for their anti-cancer activity against breast carcinoma. The aromatase enzyme is a possible target for the estrogen's positive breast cancer receptor.
Objective: Hence, a series of flavonoids have been synthesized and assessed for their in vitro cytotoxicity and aromatase inhibitory activity.
Methods: 39 Flavonoids were synthesized and characterized by spectroscopic techniques, and their computational study was performed using the maestro version of the Schrodinger. In silico ADME properties were checked by QikProp software. A total of 18 compounds were evaluated based on the docking score using cytotoxicity assay in human breast cancer cell line MCF-7.
Results: Of the 18 compounds tested, 07 compounds, namely 2b, 8b, 14b, 15b, 19b, 24b, and 30b flavonoids were found to be more active with their IC50 values of 20.73 μM, 1.636 μM, 16.08 μM, 22.02 μM, 15.75 μM, 0.345 μM and 16.08 μM, respectively, compared with the reference drug letrozole. The in vitro aromatase inhibitory activity of six compounds 2b, 8b, 14b, 19b, 24b, and 30b was conducted using a fluorogenic assay kit. The values of IC50 for compounds 2b and 24b were found to be 0.31 μM and 0.36 μM, respectively.
Conclusion: Therefore, it was concluded that compounds 2b and 24b had a potent inhibitory effect of aromatase compared with letrozole with an IC50 value of 0.86 μM. At the same time, the other compounds 8b, 14b, 30b, and 19b were considered to have similar aromatase inhibitory activity. Hence, their essential aromatase inhibitory activities make them good lead candidates for developing potent inhibitors of aromatase.
Keywords: Aromatase, flavonoids, cytotoxicity, docking, ADME prediction, cancer.
Graphical Abstract
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.11126] [PMID: 12548582]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1015-9584(09)60265-7] [PMID: 15691805]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-5122(00)00196-1] [PMID: 11311599]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00682739] [PMID: 7949203]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1054/brst.2000.0209] [PMID: 14965567]
[PMID: 11121513]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.9810685] [PMID: 9435150]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0960-0760(95)00261-8] [PMID: 8645631]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2005.03.002] [PMID: 15882656]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0960-894X(01)00617-5] [PMID: 11720850]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2007.10.057] [PMID: 18042388]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0960-0760(90)90335-I] [PMID: 2268557]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2011.03.043] [PMID: 21497425]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2005.03.050] [PMID: 15911319]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/199/3/032062]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2017.v10i2.15928]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.13005/ojc/280201]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tetlet.2012.02.108]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0968-0896(02)00312-7] [PMID: 12467713]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2011.10.074] [PMID: 22112540]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jm300930n] [PMID: 22951074]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1570180814666170327161908]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000485344] [PMID: 29176322]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0960-0760(03)00384-4] [PMID: 14630089]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-1759(83)90303-4] [PMID: 6606682]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules25071642] [PMID: 32252458]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2011.05.074] [PMID: 21703734]