Abstract
Background: Molecule compatibility is an important factor to be considered before preparing antibody-targeted liposomes, stealth-liposomes, and stealth antibody-targeted liposomes.
Objective: To determine the intermolecular interaction of 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamide- N-[methoxy(polyethyleneglycol)-2000] (ammonium salt), DOPE PEG2000 and Anti-SNAP25 (AS25) in 1,2-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphorylcholine (DPPC) monolayer, and their liposomes.
Methods: In this study, DPPC was used to create a monolayer mimicking the half membrane of liposomes to investigate its interactions with a polyclonal antibody, AS25, and DOPE PEG2000, which are based on Langmuir-Blodgett (LB) techniques. The surface morphology of DPPC-AS25 and DPPC-DOPE PEG2000-AS25 bilayers were also imaged and analyzed by using atomic force microscopy (AFM) to support the LB findings. The LB findings were then utilized as a reference to prepare DPPC liposomes in this work.
Results: The best mole ratio of DPPC-DOPE PEG2000, determined to be 50 to 1, was used to study the interaction with the polyclonal antibody AS25. The free energy of mixing (ΔGmix) of DPPC- DOPE PEG2000-AS25 was more negative than DPPC-AS25 in the entire investigated ranges, indicating that the ternary mixture of DPPC-DOPE PEG2000-AS25 was more compatible than the binary mixture of DPPC-AS25. The presence of DOPE PEG2000 in DPPC-AS25 increased the fluidity of the membrane, which resulted in a greater interaction of AS25 with DPPC.
Conclusion: The constant values of particle size and zeta potential measurements of DPPC-DOPE PEG2000-AS25 liposomes showed agreement with the LB findings, indicating that LB is a good technique to predict precise liposomal formulations.
Keywords: Intermolecular interactions, membrane fluidity, drug delivery, stealth liposomes, DPPC/Anti-SNAP25 antibody, Langmuir-Blodgett (LB).
Graphical Abstract
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemphyslip.2018.01.008] [PMID: 29360431]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajps.2014.09.004]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm.2017.138] [PMID: 29410529]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jps.22054] [PMID: 20049941]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bit.23182] [PMID: 21520021]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dev.186411] [PMID: 33355243]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00451] [PMID: 30758191]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2014.02.013] [PMID: 24612663]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2012.01.035] [PMID: 22326232]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2020.09.003] [PMID: 32926944]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jddst.2020.101549]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/pj.2015.136]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1517/17425247.2014.884557] [PMID: 24490763]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/2212796812666180912113156]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sia.6144]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10867-017-9459-2] [PMID: 28752254]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.990.117]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/08982104.2012.717298] [PMID: 23020802]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/08982100903347923] [PMID: 19899957]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-5173(93)90389-W]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bpc.2006.05.015] [PMID: 16766114]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp063377l] [PMID: 17266275]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bpc.2005.03.001] [PMID: 15911084]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemphyslip.2007.06.222] [PMID: 17681287]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2016.11.026] [PMID: 27888144]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2051013617741578] [PMID: 29201374]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10450-016-9767-z]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/ijms.15411] [PMID: 27429584]