Abstract
Background: In advanced non-small-cell lung cancer, without activating mutations and with PD-L1≥50%, Pembrolizumab monotherapy is the therapeutic standard in Europe.
Objective: To evaluate retrospectively the safety and efficacy of this drug and to investigate potential prognostic factors in daily clinical practice.
Methods: From September 2017 to September 2019, 205 consecutive patients from 14 Italian Medical Oncology Units were enrolled in the study. Gender, Age (> or <70 years), ECOG-PS (0-1 or 2), histology (squamous or nonsquamous), presence of brain, bone and liver metastases at baseline, PD-L1 score (>90% or <90%), smoking status (never or former or current) were applied to the stratified log-rank. Cox’s proportional hazards model was used for multivariate analysis.
Results: At a median follow-up of 15.2 months, median progression-free and overall survival (mPFS and mOS) were 9.2 months (95% C.I., 4.8-13.5) and 15.9 months (95% C.I., not yet evaluable), respectively. Patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS) 2 had mPFS of 2.8 months (95% C.I., 2.1-3.4) and mOS of 3.9 months (95% C.I., 2.5-5.3). Patients with liver metastases at diagnosis had an mPFS of 3.2 months (95% C.I., 0.6-5.8) and an mOS of 6.0 months (95% C.I., 3.7-8.4). At multivariate analysis for OS gender, ECOG-PS 2, and presence of liver metastases were independent prognostic factors.
Conclusion: Patients with ECOG-PS 2 derived little benefit from the use of first-line pembrolizumab. In patients with liver metastases, the association of pembrolizumab with platinum-based chemotherapy could be a better option than pembrolizumab alone.
Keywords: NSCLC, pembrolizumab, liver metastases, prognostic factors, platinum-based chemotherapy, PD-L1.
Graphical Abstract
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3322/caac.21590] [PMID: 31912902]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1501824] [PMID: 25891174]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01281-7] [PMID: 26712084]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1606774] [PMID: 27718847]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32409-7] [PMID: 30955977]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.18.00149] [PMID: 30620668]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.0013] [PMID: 28278348]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2016.11.2228] [PMID: 27913228]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1613493] [PMID: 28636851]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30033-3] [PMID: 32199466]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2020.02.023] [PMID: 32220780]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdz288] [PMID: 31435660]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2019.11.015] [PMID: 32067682]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1801005] [PMID: 29658856]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1810865] [PMID: 30280635]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2019.12.014] [PMID: 31881412]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-1471] [PMID: 33553327]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-16-0325] [PMID: 28411193]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.19.03136] [PMID: 32150489]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30167-6] [PMID: 31122901]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(19)30084-0] [PMID: 30922878]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1716948] [PMID: 29863955]