Abstract
Background: Age-related comorbidity is common and significantly increases the burden for the healthcare of the elderly. Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and hypertension are the two most prevalent age-related conditions and are highly comorbid. While hypertension is a risk factor for vascular dementia (VD), hypertension with AD (ADHyp+) is often characterized as probable vascular dementia. In the absence of imaging and other diagnostic tests, differentiating the two pathological states is difficult.
Objective: Our goals are to (1) identify differences in CSF-based vascular dementia profiles, if any, between individuals who have AD only (ADHyp-), and individuals with ADHyp+ using CSF levels of amyloid β, tau and p-tau, and (2) compare genome-wide DNA profiles of ADHyp- and ADHyp+ with an unaffected control population.
Method: Genotype and clinical data were used to compare healthy controls to AD Hyp- vs. AD Hyp+. We compared the CSF biomarkers followed by evaluating genome wide profiles in three groups, and mapped SNPs to genes based on position and lowest p-value. The significant genes were examined for co-expression and known disease networks.
Results: We found no differences between Aβ, tau and p-tau levels between ADHyp- and ADHyp+. We found TOMM40 to be associated with ADHyp- as expected but not with ADHyp+. Interestingly, SLC9A3R2 polymorphism was associated with ADHyp+, and significant gene expression changes were observed for neighboring genes.
Conclusion: Through this exploratory study using a novel cohort stratification design, we highlight the genetic differences in clinically similar phenotypes, indicating the utility of genetic profiling in aiding differential diagnosis of ADHyp+ and VD.
Keywords: Alzheimer's disease, hypertension, white matter hyperintensity, comorbidity, vascular dementia, CSF biomarkers.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2011.02.004] [PMID: 21414557]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.012658] [PMID: 27165956]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00401-016-1571-z] [PMID: 27062261]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/CS20160607] [PMID: 28515342]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ene.14030] [PMID: 31233665]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1573402114666180817113242] [PMID: 30117399]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/WAD.0000000000000138] [PMID: 26756386]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-1331.2008.02387.x] [PMID: 19146641]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2015.05.009] [PMID: 26194313]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btw075] [PMID: 26873930]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.06.009] [PMID: 20598278]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw943] [PMID: 27924018]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkq537] [PMID: 20576703]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004219] [PMID: 25885710]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2013.00242] [PMID: 24062991]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/JAD-150335] [PMID: 26444770]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2011.04.028] [PMID: 21636279]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1535370217693114] [PMID: 28165296]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/JAD-170485] [PMID: 28869479]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41593-018-0253-7] [PMID: 30349106]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s42003-019-0520-5] [PMID: 31372510]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aay9506] [PMID: 32875100]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41537-020-0097-5] [PMID: 32245959]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12974-016-0758-5] [PMID: 27832807]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mcn.2020.103542] [PMID: 32841720]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cytogfr.2018.12.003] [PMID: 30579845]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13024-017-0150-7] [PMID: 28095923]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004872-200409000-00016] [PMID: 15311100]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41588-018-0303-9] [PMID: 30578418]