Login Register Cart 0
Generic placeholder image

Current Rheumatology Reviews

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 1573-3971
ISSN (Online): 1875-6360

Back
Journal Home About Journal Editorial Board Journal Insight Current Issue Volumes/Issues
Subscribe
Research Article

Contribution of Ultrasonography of Hands and Wrists in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis

Author(s): Saoussen Miladi*, Wafa Hamdi, Kaouther Maatallah, Asma EL Elj, Mouna Chelli, Dhia Kaffel and Mohamed Montasser Kchir

Volume 17, Issue 3, 2021

Published on: 19 February, 2021

Page: [342 - 348] Pages: 7

DOI: 10.2174/1573397117666210219120400

Price: $65

Abstract

Objectives: Early diagnosis and management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have improved the outcome of patients. In the last decade, musculoskeletal Ultrasonography (MSUS) had demonstrated its superiority over clinical examination in detecting synovitis in RA. We conducted this present study in order to assess the added value of MSUS in diagnosing early RA.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted, including one hundred patients diagnosed RA based on the physician's opinion and presenting with inflammatory arthralgia or swollen joints for more than 6 weeks and less than 2 years. Patients underwent clinical, laboratory, and radiographic examination. MSUS was performed by a radiologist blinded to clinical findings assessing 22 joints of hands. A US ACR/EULAR 2010 score was calculated by replacing the swollen joints of hands with those expressing synovitis in Greyscale US. Agreement between clinical and US ACR/EULAR score was assessed.

Results: Among the 2200 joints scanned by the US, synovitis was detected in 81% of patients, an intra-articular effusion in 36% patients, and PD signals in 51% of patients. Flexor tenosynovitis was present in 55% of patients and extensor tenosynovitis in 59% of patients. Synovitis and PD signals were more often detected in wrists. PD mode was found to be correlated with CRP results (r=0,302, p=0,023). The MSUS assessment has demonstrated synovitis on 71% (N=22) patients who were free of swollen joints on clinical examination. Through 13 patients expressing monoarthritis at clinical examination, 69% (N=9) patients were reclassified with oligo or polyarthritis. By adding US data, a further 13 patients accomplished the ACR/EULAR score. A good level of agreement was found between clinical and US ACR/EULAR criteria (k=0,684, p=0,001).

Conclusion: MSUS is an inexpensive and accessible examination tool, which should be considered in patients in the onset of an inflammatory rheumatic disease in order to benefit of the window of opportunity and reach remission.

Keywords: Ultrasound, Synovitis, early diagnosis, Rheumatoid Arthritis, undifferentiated arthritis, data accuracy.

« Previous Next »
Graphical Abstract

[1]
Dale J, Purves D, McConnachie A, McInnes I, Porter D. Tightening up? Impact of musculoskeletal ultrasound disease activity assessment on early rheumatoid arthritis patients treated using a treat to target strategy. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2014; 66(1): 19-26.
[2]
Plant MJ, Jones PW, Saklatvala J, Ollier WE, Dawes PT. Patterns of radiological progression in early rheumatoid arthritis: results of an 8 year prospective study. J Rheumatol 1998; 25(3): 417-26.
[PMID: 9517757]
[3]
Wolfe F, Freundlich B, Straus WL. Increase in cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease prevalence in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 2003; 30(1): 36-40.
[PMID: 12508387]
[4]
Georgiadis AN, Voulgari PV, Argyropoulou MI, et al. Early treatment reduces the cardiovascular risk factors in newly diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis patients. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2008; 38(1): 13-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2007.09.008] [PMID: 18191989]
[5]
Villaverde García V, Balsa Criado A. Does early treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis lead to a better long-term prognosis?. Reumatol Clin 2010; 6(2): 106-10.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2173-5743(10)70024-1] [PMID: 21794692]
[6]
Sokka T, Mäkinen H. Drug management of early rheumatoid arthritis - 2008. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2009; 23(1): 93-102.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.berh.2008.08.003] [PMID: 19233049]
[7]
Radner H, Neogi T, Smolen JS, Aletaha D. Performance of the 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic literature review. Ann Rheum Dis 2014; 73(1): 114-23.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203284] [PMID: 23592710]
[8]
Kawashiri SY, Suzuki T, Nakashima Y, et al. Ultrasonographic examination of rheumatoid arthritis patients who are free of physical synovitis: power Doppler subclinical synovitis is associated with bone erosion. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2014; 53(3): 562-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/ket405] [PMID: 24319104]
[9]
Wakefield RJ, Gibbon WW, Conaghan PG, et al. The value of sonography in the detection of bone erosions in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison with conventional radiography. Arthritis Rheum 2000; 43(12): 2762-70.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1529-0131(200012)43:12<2762::AID-ANR16>3.0.CO;2-#] [PMID: 11145034]
[10]
van Riel PLCM, Renskers L. The Disease Activity Score (DAS) and the Disease Activity Score using 28 joint counts (DAS28) in the management of rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2016; 34(5)(Suppl. 101): S40-4.
[PMID: 27762189]
[11]
D’Agostino M-A, Terslev L, Aegerter P, et al. Scoring ultrasound synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis: a EULAR-OMERACT ultrasound taskforce-Part 1: definition and development of a standardised, consensus-based scoring system. RMD Open 2017; 3(1): e000428.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2016-000428] [PMID: 28948983]
[12]
Naredo E, D’Agostino MA, Wakefield RJ, et al. Reliability of a consensus-based ultrasound score for tenosynovitis in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2013; 72(8): 1328-34.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202092] [PMID: 22984169]
[13]
Szkudlarek M, Terslev L, Wakefield RJ, et al. Summary findings of a systematic literature review of the ultrasound assessment of bone erosions in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 2016; 43(1): 12-21.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.141416] [PMID: 26628596]
[14]
Dougados M, Jousse-Joulin S, Mistretta F, et al. Evaluation of several ultrasonography scoring systems for synovitis and comparison to clinical examination: results from a prospective multicentre study of rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2010; 69(5): 828-33.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ard.2009.115493] [PMID: 19740905]
[15]
Filer A, de Pablo P, Allen G, et al. Utility of ultrasound joint counts in the prediction of rheumatoid arthritis in patients with very early synovitis. Ann Rheum Dis 2011; 70(3): 500-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ard.2010.131573] [PMID: 21115552]
[16]
Luz KR, Pinheiro MM, Petterle GS, et al. A new musculoskeletal ultrasound scoring system (US10) of the hands and wrist joints for evaluation of early rheumatoid arthritis patients. Rev Bras Reumatol Engl Ed 2016; 56(5): 421-31.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbre.2016.07.006] [PMID: 27692392]
[17]
Mendonça JA, Yazbek MA, Costallat BL, Gutiérrez M, Bértolo MB. The modified US7 score in the assessment of synovitis in early rheumatoid arthritis. Rev Bras Reumatol 2014; 54(4): 287-94.
[PMID: 25627224]
[18]
Pratt AG, Lorenzi AR, Wilson G, Platt PN, Isaacs JD. Predicting persistent inflammatory arthritis amongst early arthritis clinic patients in the UK: is musculoskeletal ultrasound required? Arthritis Res Ther 2013; 15(5): R118.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/ar4298] [PMID: 24028567]
[19]
Rezaei H, Af Klint E, Hammer HB, et al. Analysis of correlation and causes for discrepancy between quantitative and semi-quantitative Doppler scores in synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2017; 56(2): 255-62.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kew385] [PMID: 28123118]
[20]
Freeston JE, Wakefield RJ, Conaghan PG, Hensor EMA, Stewart SP, Emery P. A diagnostic algorithm for persistence of very early inflammatory arthritis: the utility of power Doppler ultrasound when added to conventional assessment tools. Ann Rheum Dis 2010; 69(2): 417-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ard.2008.106658] [PMID: 19359260]
[21]
Gabriel SE. The epidemiology of rheumatoid arthritis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2001; 27(2): 269-81.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0889-857X(05)70201-5] [PMID: 11396092]
[22]
Wakefield RJ, O’Connor PJ, Conaghan PG, et al. Finger tendon disease in untreated early rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging. Arthritis Rheum 2007; 57(7): 1158-64.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/art.23016] [PMID: 17907233]
[23]
Wakefield RJ, Green MJ, Marzo-Ortega H, et al. Should oligoarthritis be reclassified? Ultrasound reveals a high prevalence of subclinical disease. Ann Rheum Dis 2004; 63(4): 382-5.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ard.2003.007062] [PMID: 15020331]
[24]
Naredo E, Rodríguez M, Campos C, et al. Validity, reproducibility, and responsiveness of a twelve-joint simplified power doppler ultrasonographic assessment of joint inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2008; 59(4): 515-22.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/art.23529] [PMID: 18383408]
[25]
Backhaus M, Ohrndorf S, Kellner H, et al. Evaluation of a novel 7-joint ultrasound score in daily rheumatologic practice: a pilot project. Arthritis Rheum 2009; 61(9): 1194-201.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/art.24646] [PMID: 19714611]
[26]
Perricone C, Ceccarelli F, Modesti M, et al. The 6-joint ultrasonographic assessment: a valid, sensitive-to-change and feasible method for evaluating joint inflammation in RA. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2012; 51(5): 866-73.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/ker405] [PMID: 22210661]
[27]
Boers M, Brooks P, Strand CV, Tugwell P. The OMERACT filter for Outcome Measures in Rheumatology. J Rheumatol 1998; 25(2): 198-9.
[PMID: 9489805]
[28]
Naredo E, Collado P, Cruz A, et al. Longitudinal power Doppler ultrasonographic assessment of joint inflammatory activity in early rheumatoid arthritis: predictive value in disease activity and radiologic progression. Arthritis Rheum 2007; 57(1): 116-24.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/art.22461] [PMID: 17266071]
[29]
Ji L, Deng X, Geng Y, Song Z, Zhang Z. The additional benefit of ultrasonography to 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria when diagnosing rheumatoid arthritis in the absence of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies. Clin Rheumatol 2017; 36(2): 261-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10067-016-3465-9] [PMID: 27848057]
[30]
Szkudlarek M, Court-Payen M, Jacobsen S, Klarlund M, Thomsen HS, Østergaard M. Interobserver agreement in ultrasonography of the finger and toe joints in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2003; 48(4): 955-62.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/art.10877] [PMID: 12687537]

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
Article Metrics
15
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy