Abstract
Background: Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) 3D printing has received much interest as a fabrication method in the medical and pharmaceutical industry due to its accessibility and cost-effectiveness. A low-cost method to produce biocompatible and biodegradable filaments can improve the usability of FDM 3D printing for biomedical applications.
Objectives: The feasibility of producing low-cost filaments suitable for FDM 3D printing via single screw and twin-screw hot melt extrusion was explored.
Methods: A single-screw extruder and a twin-screw extruder were used to produce biocompatible filaments composed of varying concentrations of polyethylene glycol (PEG) at 10%, 20%, 30% w/w and polylactic acid (PLA) 90%, 80% and 70% w/w, respectively. DSC, TGA and FTIR were employed to investigate the effect of PEG on the PLA filaments.
Results: The presence of PEG lowered the processing temperature of the formulation compositions via melt-extrusion, making it suitable for pharmaceutical applications. The use of PEG can lower the melting point of the PLA polymer to 170°C, hence lowering the printing temperature. PEG can also improve the plasticity of the filaments, as the rupture strain of twin-screw extruded filaments increased up to 10-fold as compared to the commercial filaments. Advanced application of FTIR analysis confirmed the compatibility and miscibility of PEG with PLA.
Conclusion: Twin-screw extrusion is more effective in producing a polymeric mixture of filaments as the mixing is more homogenous. The PEG/PLA filament is suitable to be used in 3D printing of medical or pharmaceutical applications such as medical implants, drug delivery systems, or personalised tablets.
Keywords: Biocompatible, biopolymers, filaments, FDM 3D printing, hot melt extrusion, polyethylene glycol (PEG).
Graphical Abstract
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2016.08.011]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/4989534] [PMID: 31885687]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.03.097]
[PMID: 25336867]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.5b00510] [PMID: 26473653]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.5213/inj.2013.17.3.98] [PMID: 24143287]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2020.110794] [PMID: 32409024]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.02.205] [PMID: 32092425]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.126377] [PMID: 32113137]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/org.26048] [PMID: 23959206]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.07.534]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.06.019] [PMID: 21756992]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/bm050098f] [PMID: 15877406]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/app.39742]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2003.09.055]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2010.12.011]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2011.09.003] [PMID: 21925600]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40242-018-7337-5]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8432-5_2]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1517/17425240802583421] [PMID: 19040397]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4945555]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1707961]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4322/polimeros.2013.037]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4945957]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1533/9781845690762.2.251]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2005.03.069]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.09.006] [PMID: 23131793]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.5011895]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pc.22660]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/pac-2016-0919]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C7RA05422J]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pen.11147]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100275-9.00002-4]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/app.32305]