Generic placeholder image

Current Medical Imaging

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 1573-4056
ISSN (Online): 1875-6603

Case Report

A Rare Case of Ureteral Diverticulum Incidentally Detected During Angiography

Author(s): Emre Emekli*, Elif Gündoğdu, Ata Özen and Fahrettin Küçükay

Volume 17, Issue 4, 2021

Published on: 29 October, 2020

Page: [549 - 551] Pages: 3

DOI: 10.2174/1573405616999201029123851

Price: $65

Abstract

Background: A ureteral diverticulum (UD) is a rare urological malformation characterized by the saccular enlargement of the ureteral wall. It can be of different sizes and in various localizations. In the literature, three types of UD have been defined as abortive bifid ureter, congenital, and acquired.

Case Report: In a 65-year-old male patient, an enlargement was incidentally detected in the distal part of the right ureter on fluoroscopy during the passage of the contrast agent applied during angiography. The medical history of the patient was not remarkable; thus, computed tomography (CT) was performed to investigate the etiology. A dilated tubular structure separate from the ureter was observed in the middle part of the right ureter on CT, clearer in the excision phase. This tubular structure distally connected with the ureter and was consistent with the abortive bifid ureter type of UD.

Discussion: UD may present with renal colic, hematuria, and upper urinary tract infections, or it may be asymptomatic as in our case. Asymptomatic cases are usually incidentally detected during radiological imaging. Although treatment is not required for these patients, surgical treatment may be required in the presence of symptoms.

Conclusion: UD is an entity that can be asymptomatic until adulthood and may be detected incidentally in radiological evaluations. UD should be kept in mind when the cystic lesion associated with the ureter is detected in radiological examination. Excretory phase CT/CT urography noninvasive imaging method must be preferred to evaluate the relationship of the lesion with the ureter.

Keywords: Computed tomography, angiography, congenital, ureteral diverticulum, asymptomatic, bifid ureter.

Graphical Abstract

[1]
Gupta RK, Sanghvi B, Munghate G. Pediatr Urol Case Rep 2017; 4(6): 399-404.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.14534/PUCR.2017632181]
[2]
Perlmutter AD, Retik AB, Bauer SB. Anomalies of the upper urinary tract. Philadelphia: WB Saunders: Campbell ed. Urology 1986; 2: pp. 1713-55.
[3]
McLoughlin LC, Davis NF, Dowling C, Eng MP, Power RE. Ureteral diverticulum: a review of the current literature. Can J Urol 2013; 20(5): 6893-6.
[PMID: 24128825]
[4]
Herndon CD, McKenna PH. Antenatally detected proximal ureteral diverticulum. Urology 2000; 55(5): 774.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(00)00506-9] [PMID: 10792106]
[5]
Horebeek IV, Wyndaele M, Verlinde P. Congenital mid ureteric value: A case report. Ped Urol Case Rep 2016; 3(5): 147-52.
[6]
Mori C, Yamada D, Homma Y. A case of calculus in the true ureteral diverticulum. Int J Urol 2011; 18(2): 180-1.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2042.2010.02691.x] [PMID: 21219444]
[7]
Barrett DM, Malek RS. Ureteral diverticulum. J Urol 1975; 114(1): 33-5.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)66936-2] [PMID: 806705]
[8]
Franco I, Choudhury M, Eshghi M, Bhalodi A, Addonizio JC. Fibroepithelial polyp associated with congenital ureteral diverticulum: report of 2 cases. J Urol 1988; 140(3): 598-600.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)41731-9] [PMID: 3137370]
[9]
Li JR, Chiu KY, Lin HM, Cheng CL, Yang CR, Hung SW. Laparoscopic excision of a ureteral diverticulum. Int J Urol 2006; 13(7): 995-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2042.2006.01456.x] [PMID: 16882071]

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy