Abstract
Background: Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate is a prodrug of tenofovir diphosphate that exposes patients to renal toxicity over the long term. Tenofovir alafenamide, a new prodrug, now makes it possible to reduce toxicity, but at the cost of an alteration in lipid profile. There is currently no recommendation for follow-up of lipid profile when switching from tenofovir disoproxil fumarate to tenofovir alafenamide.
Objective: Our study aimed to evaluate the effects on renal function and lipid profile of a switch from tenofovir disoproxil fumarate to tenofovir alafenamide, and the consequences for patient management.
Methods: Demographic, clinical and biological data was recorded from a retrospective clinical cohort study in real-life, including patients who switched from tenofovir disoproxil fumarate to tenofovir alafenamide. A descriptive analysis of the study population, with a comparison of biological parameters using the paired Student t test for paired data was performed.
Results: From January 2016 to January 2019, a total of 103 patients were included. There was no significant difference in renal function before vs after the switch in therapy (p=0.29 for creatinine, p=0.30 for phosphoremia). We observed a change in lipid profile, with a significant increase in total cholesterol (p=0.0006), HDL cholesterol (p=0.0055) and triglycerides (p=0.0242). Four patients received lipid-lowering therapy after switching.
Conclusion: In patients who switch from tenofovir disoproxil fumarate to tenofovir alafenamide, lipid profile is altered, and may require initiation of lipid-lowering therapy. It seems necessary to monitor lipid parameters after this switch, despite the absence of an official recommendation.
Keywords: HIV, tenofovir alafenamide fumarate, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, dyslipidemia, adverse events, hypolipidemic agents.
Graphical Abstract
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AAC.42.3.612] [PMID: 9517941]
[PMID: 27230467]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/157016212802429802] [PMID: 22716111]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.antiviral.2015.11.009] [PMID: 26640223]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/COH.0000000000000379] [PMID: 28403027]
[PMID: 30264826]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0b013e32833ad8b4] [PMID: 20495438]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0b013e328341f925] [PMID: 21150555]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/civ296] [PMID: 25870325]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0000000000001817] [PMID: 29683855]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0000000000002463] [PMID: 31833849]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1570162043351129] [PMID: 15544452]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000000225] [PMID: 24872136]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60616-X] [PMID: 25890673]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3018(17)30031-0] [PMID: 28259777]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3018(16)00024-2] [PMID: 27036991]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00348-5] [PMID: 26538525]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000001344] [PMID: 28272164]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0000000000002350] [PMID: 31764103]
[PMID: 30388308]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3851/IMP2305] [PMID: 22910324]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0021-9150(82)90227-1] [PMID: 7159498]