Abstract
Introduction: Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) is a lethal environmental and industrial poison. The mortality rate of occupational acute H2S poisoning reported in China is 23.1% ~ 50%. Due to the huge amount of information on metabolomics changes after body poisoning, it is important to use intelligent algorithms to investigate multivariate interactions.
Methods: This paper first uses GC-MS metabolomics to detect changes in the urine components of the poisoned group and control rats to form a metabolic dataset, and then uses the SVM classification algorithm in machine learning to train the hydrogen sulfide poisoning training dataset to obtain a classification recognition model. A batch of rats (n = 15) was randomly selected and exposed to 20 ppm H2S gas for 40 days (twice morning and evening, 1 hour each exposure) to prepare a chronic H2S rat poisoning model. The other rats (n = 15) were exposed to the same volume of air and 0 ppm hydrogen sulfide gas as the control group. The treated urine samples were tested using a GC-MS.
Results: The method locates the optimal parameters of SVM, which improves the accuracy of SVM classification to 100%. This paper uses the information to gain an attribute evaluation method to screen out the top 6 biomarkers that contribute to the predicted category (Glycerol, &946;-Hydroxybutyric acid, arabinofuranose, Pentitol, L-Tyrosine, L-Proline).
Conclusion: The SVM diagnostic model of hydrogen sulfide poisoning constructed in this work has training time and prediction accuracy; it has achieved excellent results and provided an intelligent decision- making method for the diagnosis of hydrogen sulfide poisoning.
Keywords: Hydrogen sulfide, metabolomics, poisoning, SVM, GC-MS, machine learning.
Graphical Abstract
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10773525.2016.1145881] [PMID: 27128692]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/10408444.2014.971943] [PMID: 25430508]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-07266-5] [PMID: 31900777]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0192623319878401] [PMID: 31665998]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/APhysiol.98.2011.4.1] [PMID: 22173019]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2009.09.018] [PMID: 19770036]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13181-019-00710-5] [PMID: 31062177]
[PMID: 29081104]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000445938] [PMID: 27193372]
[PMID: 27220433]
[PMID: 22730684]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115159] [PMID: 32663678]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1008662] [PMID: 32663224]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2015.02.014]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1248/cpb.c13-00988] [PMID: 24881655]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/omi.2019.0086] [PMID: 31513460]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11306-019-1587-1] [PMID: 31506796]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11306-019-1615-1] [PMID: 31754808]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11306-019-1611-5] [PMID: 31696341]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jisesa/ieaa008] [PMID: 32186739]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/EC-19-0012] [PMID: 31042671]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mSystems.00258-20] [PMID: 32606026]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00006]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-08268-4] [PMID: 32556670]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0736-4679(85)90216-1] [PMID: 4093555]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0736-4679(85)90215-X] [PMID: 4093554]
[PMID: 31177693]