Abstract
Background: Recent clinical trial studies have reported that L-carnitine supplementation can reduce the mortality rate in patients with sepsis, but there are no definitive results in this context. The current systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effect of L-carnitine supplementation on 28-day and one-year mortality in septic patients.
Methods: A systematic search conducted on Pubmed, Scopus and Cochrane Library databases up to June 2019 without any language restriction. The publications were reviewed based on the Cochrane handbook and preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA). To compare the effects of L-carnitine with placebo, Risk Ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled according to the random effects model.
Results: Across five enrolled clinical trials, we found that L-carnitine supplementation reduce one-year mortality in septic patients with SOFA> 12 (RR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.49 to 0.96; P= 0.03) but had no significant effect on reducing 28-day mortality ((RR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.68 to 1.28; P= 0.65) compared to placebo. Finally, we observed that based on current trials, L-carnitine supplementation may not have clinically a significant effect on mortality rate.
Conclusion: L-carnitine patients with higher SOFA score can reduce the mortality rate. However, the number of trials, study duration and using a dosage of L-carnitine are limited in this context and further large prospective trials are required to clarify the effect of L-carnitine on mortality rate in septic patients.
Keywords: L-carnitine, sepsis, mortality, SOFA, clinical trial, meta-analysis.
Graphical Abstract
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e31827c09f8] [PMID: 23442987]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.0289] [PMID: 26903336]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-017-4683-6] [PMID: 28101605]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-012-2769-8] [PMID: 23361625]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1500896] [PMID: 25776532]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2016.10.31397] [PMID: 28210362]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010-0687] [PMID: 20937660]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.18433/J3JS4C] [PMID: 24021290]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2016.01.023]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000003517] [PMID: 30379669]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0b013e318238b5cd] [PMID: 22460770]
[PMID: 2521428]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0148607113495414] [PMID: 23851424]
[PMID: 1879992]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/S0962935193000766] [PMID: 18475572]
[http://dx.doi.org/ 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135 ] [PMID: 19622511 ]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.12] [PMID: 26061376]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SHK.0000000000000997] [PMID: 29384504]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.8b00774] [PMID: 30895797]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.201409-415OC] [PMID: 25496487]
[PMID: 29736227]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12031-013-9999-2] [PMID: 23564281]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/bst0311133]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954422418000124] [PMID: 29984680]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1071-9164(96)80016-9] [PMID: 8989644]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01709751] [PMID: 8844239]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.10.007] [PMID: 28110990]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.286.14.1754] [PMID: 11594901]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c3515] [PMID: 20639294]