Generic placeholder image

Current Bioinformatics

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 1574-8936
ISSN (Online): 2212-392X

Research Article

An Ensembled SVM Based Approach for Predicting Adverse Drug Reactions

Author(s): Pratik Joshi*, Masilamani Vedhanayagam and Raj Ramesh

Volume 16, Issue 3, 2021

Published on: 07 July, 2020

Page: [422 - 432] Pages: 11

DOI: 10.2174/1574893615999200707141420

Price: $65

Abstract

Background: Preventing adverse drug reactions (ADRs) is imperative for the safety of the people. The problem of under-reporting the ADRs has been prevalent across the world, making it difficult to develop the prediction models, which are unbiased. As a result, most of the models are skewed to the negative samples leading to high accuracy but poor performance in other metrics such as precision, recall, F1 score, and AUROC score.

Objective: In this work, we have proposed a novel way of predicting the ADRs by balancing the dataset.

Methods: The whole data set has been partitioned into balanced smaller data sets. SVMs with optimal kernel have been learned using each of the balanced data sets and the prediction of given ADR for the given drug has been obtained by voting from the ensembled optimal SVMs learned.

Results: We have found that results are encouraging and comparable with the competing methods in the literature and obtained the average sensitivity of 0.97 for all the ADRs. The model has been interpreted and explained with SHAP values by various plots.

Conclusion: A novel way of predicting ADRs by balancing the dataset has been proposed thereby reducing the effect of unbalanced datasets.

Keywords: Adverse drug reaction, machine learning, SVM, ensembling, SIDER, randomaized search.

Graphical Abstract

[1]
Kohn LT, Corrigan J, Donaldson MS. others To err is human: building a safer health system. National academy press Washington, DC 2000; 6..
[2]
Singh P, Agrawal M, Hishikar R, Joshi U, Maheshwari B, Halwai A. Adverse drug reactions at adverse drug reaction monitoring center in Raipur: Analysis of spontaneous reports during 1 year. Indian J Pharmacol 2017; 49(6): 432-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijp.IJP_781_16] [PMID: 29674797]
[3]
Hazell L, Shakir SAW. Under-reporting of adverse drug reactions: a systematic review. Drug Saf 2006; 29(5): 385-96.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2165/00002018-200629050-00003] [PMID: 16689555]
[4]
Santiso S, Pérez A, Casillas A. Exploring joint AB-LSTM with embedded lemmas for adverse drug reaction discovery IEEE J Biomed Heal informatics 2018; 23(5): 2148–55..
[5]
Korkontzelos I, Nikfarjam A, Shardlow M, Sarker A, Ananiadou S, Gonzalez GH. Analysis of the effect of sentiment analysis on extracting adverse drug reactions from tweets and forum posts. J Biomed Inform 2016; 62: 148-58.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2016.06.007] [PMID: 27363901]
[6]
Kuhn M, Campillos M, Letunic I, Jensen LJ, Bork P. A side effect resource to capture phenotypic effects of drugs. Mol Syst Biol 2010; 6(1): 343.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/msb.2009.98] [PMID: 20087340]
[7]
Oronoz M, Gojenola K, Pérez A, de Ilarraza AD, Casillas A. On the creation of a clinical gold standard corpus in Spanish: Mining adverse drug reactions. J Biomed Inform 2015; 56: 318-32.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2015.06.016] [PMID: 26141794]
[8]
Combi C, Zorzi M, Pozzani G, Moretti U, Arzenton E. From narrative descriptions to MedDRA: automagically encoding adverse drug reactions. J Biomed Inform 2018; 84: 184-99.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2018.07.001] [PMID: 29981491]
[9]
Rogers D, Hahn M. Extended-connectivity fingerprints. J Chem Inf Model 2010; 50(5): 742-54.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ci100050t] [PMID: 20426451]
[10]
Bean DM, Wu H, Iqbal E, et al. Knowledge graph prediction of unknown adverse drug reactions and validation in electronic health records. Sci Rep 2017; 7(1): 16416.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-16674-x] [PMID: 29180758]
[11]
Brouwers L, Iskar M, Zeller G, van Noort V, Bork P. Network neighbors of drug targets contribute to drug side-effect similarity. PLoS One 2011; 6(7)e22187
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022187] [PMID: 21765950]
[12]
Cami A, Arnold A, Manzi S, Reis B. Predicting adverse drug events using pharmacological network models . Sci Transl Med 2011; 3(114): 114ra127-114ra127..
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3002774]
[13]
Cheng F, Li W, Wang X, et al. Adverse drug events: database construction and in silico prediction. J Chem Inf Model 2013; 53(4): 744-52.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ci4000079] [PMID: 23521697]
[14]
Wang Z, Clark NR, Ma’ayan A. Drug-induced adverse events prediction with the LINCS L1000 data. Bioinformatics 2016; 32(15): 2338-45.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btw168] [PMID: 27153606]
[15]
White RW, Wang S, Pant A, et al. Early identification of adverse drug reactions from search log data. J Biomed Inform 2016; 59: 42-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2015.11.005] [PMID: 26610385]
[16]
Harpaz R, Odgers D, Gaskin G, et al. A time-indexed reference standard of adverse drug reactions. Sci Data 2014; 1(1)140043
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2014.43] [PMID: 25632348]
[17]
Harpaz R, DuMouchel W, Schuemie M, et al. Toward multimodal signal detection of adverse drug reactions. J Biomed Inform 2017; 76: 41-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2017.10.013] [PMID: 29081385]
[18]
Scheiber J, Jenkins JL, Sukuru SCK, et al. Mapping adverse drug reactions in chemical space. J Med Chem 2009; 52(9): 3103-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jm801546k] [PMID: 19378990]
[19]
Pauwels E, Stoven V, Yamanishi Y. Predicting drug side-effect profiles: a chemical fragment-based approach. BMC Bioinformatics 2011; 12(1): 169.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-12-169] [PMID: 21586169]
[20]
Yamanishi Y, Pauwels E, Kotera M. Drug side-effect prediction based on the integration of chemical and biological spaces. J Chem Inf Model 2012; 52(12): 3284-92.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ci2005548] [PMID: 23157436]
[21]
LaBute MX, Zhang X, Lenderman J, Bennion BJ, Wong SE, Lightstone FC. Adverse drug reaction prediction using scores produced by large-scale drug-protein target docking on high-performance computing machines. PLoS One 2014; 9(9)e106298
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106298] [PMID: 25191698]
[22]
Dey S, Luo H, Fokoue A, Hu J, Zhang P. Predicting adverse drug reactions through interpretable deep learning framework. BMC Bioinformatics 2018; 19(21): 476.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-018-2544-0] [PMID: 30591036]
[23]
Wang C-S, Lin P-J, Cheng C-L, Tai S-H, Kao Yang YH, Chiang J-H. Detecting potential adverse drug reactions using a deep neural network model. J Med Internet Res 2019; 21(2)e11016
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/11016] [PMID: 30724742]
[24]
Kuhn M, von Mering C, Campillos M, Jensen LJ, Bork P. STITCH: interaction networks of chemicals and proteins . Nucleic Acids Res 2007; 36(suppl_1): D684-D8..
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkm795]
[25]
Chen B, Wild D, Guha R. PubChem as a source of polypharmacology. J Chem Inf Model 2009; 49(9): 2044-55.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ci9001876] [PMID: 19708682]
[26]
Cortes C, Vapnik V. Support-vector networks. Mach Learn 1995; 20(3): 273-97.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00994018]
[27]
Harpaz R, DuMouchel W, LePendu P, Bauer-Mehren A, Ryan P, Shah NH. Performance of pharmacovigilance signal-detection algorithms for the FDA adverse event reporting system. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2013; 93(6): 539-46.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/clpt.2013.24] [PMID: 23571771]
[28]
Lundberg SM, Lee S-I. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions . Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems Curran Associates, Inc. 2017; 30: pp. 4765-74.. http://papers.nips.cc/paper/7062-a-unified-approach-to-interpreting-model-predictions.pdf
[29]
Lundberg SM, Nair B, Vavilala MS, et al. Explainable machine-learning predictions for the prevention of hypoxaemia during surgery. Nat Biomed Eng 2018; 2(10): 749-60.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41551-018-0304-0] [PMID: 31001455]
[30]
Platt J. Sequential minimal optimization: A fast algorithm for training support vector machines 1998.

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy