Login Register Cart 0
Generic placeholder image

Current Medical Imaging

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 1573-4056
ISSN (Online): 1875-6603

Back
Journal Home About Journal Editorial Board Journal Insight Current Issue Volumes/Issues
Subscribe
Research Article

Optimized Radial Basis Neural Network for Classification of Breast Cancer Images

Author(s): G. M. Rajathi*

Volume 17, Issue 1, 2021

Published on: 16 May, 2020

Page: [97 - 108] Pages: 12

DOI: 10.2174/1573405616666200516172118

Price: $65

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer is a curable disease if diagnosed at an early stage. The chances of having breast cancer are the lowest in married women after the breast-feeding phase because the cancer is formed from the blocked milk ducts.

Introduction: Nowadays, cancer is considered the leading cause of death globally. Breast cancer is the most common cancer among females. It is possible to develop breast cancer while breast-feeding a baby, but it is rare. Mammography is one of the most effective methods used in hospitals and clinics for early detection of breast cancer. Various researchers are used in artificial intelligence- based mammogram techniques. This process of mammography will reduce the death rate of the patients affected by breast cancer. This process is improved by the image analysing, detection, screening, diagnosing, and other performance measures.

Methods: The radial basis neural network will be used for classification purposes. The radial basis neural network is designed with the help of the optimization algorithm. The optimization is to tune the classifier to reduce the error rate with the minimum time for the training process. The cuckoo search algorithm will be used for this purpose.

Results: Thus, the proposed optimum RBNN is determined to classify breast cancer images. In this, the three sets of properties were classified by performing the feature extraction and feature reduction. In this breast cancer MRI image, the normal, benign, and malignant is taken to perform the classification. The minimum fitness value is determined to evaluate the optimum value of possible locations. The radial basis function is evaluated with the cuckoo search algorithm to optimize the feature reduction process. The proposed methodology is compared with the traditional radial basis neural network using the evaluation parameter like accuracy, precision, recall and f1-score. The whole system model is done by using Matrix Laboratory (MATLAB) with the adaptation of 2018a since the proposed system is most efficient than most recent related literature.

Conclusion: Thus, it concluded with the efficient classification process of RBNN using a cuckoo search algorithm for breast cancer images. The mammogram images are taken into recent research because breast cancer is a major issue for women. This process is carried to classify the various features for three sets of properties. The optimized classifier improves performance and provides a better result. In this proposed research work, the input image is filtered using a wiener filter, and the classifier extracts the feature based on the breast image.

Keywords: Breast cancer, radial basis function, optimization, cuckoo search, F1-score, classification, cancer imaging net.

Graphical Abstract

[1]
Kaymak S, Helwan A, Uzun D. Breast cancer image classification using arrtificial neural networks Proceedings of the 9th inter Conf on theory and application of soft computing, Budapest, Hungary. 24-25 Aug; 2017; p. 120: 126-131.
[2]
Beibit A. Analytics of Heterogeneous Breast Cancer Data using Neuroevolution. IEEE Access 2019; 7: 18050-60.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2897078]
[3]
Ashraf AB, Gavenonis SC, Daye D, Mies C, Rosen MA, Kontos D. A multichannel Markov random field framework for tumor segmentation with an application to classification of gene expression-based breast cancer recurrence risk. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2013; 32(4): 637-48.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2012.2219589] [PMID: 23008246]
[4]
Bardou D, Zhang K, Sayed M. Ahmed, “Classification of breast cancer based on histology images using convolutional neural networks. IEEE Access 2018; 6: 24680-93.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2831280]
[5]
Basavanhally AN, Ganesan S, Agner S, et al. Computerized image-based detection and grading of lymphocytic infiltration in HER2+ breast cancer histopathology. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2010; 57(3): 642-53.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2009.2035305] [PMID: 19884074]
[6]
Nadia B. A Deep Learning approach for breast invasive ductal carcinoma detection and lymphoma multi-classification in histological images. IEEE Access 2019; 7: 44709-20.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2908724]
[7]
Brandt SS, Karemore G, Karssemeijer N, Nielsen M. An anatomically oriented breast coordinate system for mammogram analysis. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2011; 30(10): 1841-51.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2011.2155082] [PMID: 21609879]
[8]
Cruz TN, Cruz TM, Santos WP. Detection and classification of lesion in mammographies using neural networks and morphological wavelets. IEEE Latin America Transactions 2018; 16(3): 926-31.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TLA.2018.8358675]
[9]
Feng X, Song L, Wang S, Song H, et al. Accurate Prediction of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Pathological complete remission for the four sub-types of Breast Cancer. IEEE Access 2019; 7: 134697-706.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2941543]
[10]
Yasmeen M. Remote Computer-Aided Breast cancer detection and diagnosis system based on cytological images. IEEE Syst J 2014; 8(3): 949-64.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JSYST.2013.2279415]
[11]
Jianqi Teo Y. Breast Lesion Classification using ultrawideband early time breast lesion response. IEEE Trans Antenn Propag 2010; 58(8): 2604-13.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TAP.2010.2050423]
[12]
Li X, Radulovic M, Kanjer K, et al. Discriminative Pattern mining for breast cancer histopathology image classification via fully convolutional autoencoder. IEEE Access 2019; 7: 36433-45.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2904245]
[13]
Qi Q, Li Y, Wang J, et al. Label-efficient breast cancer histopathological image classification. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform 2019; 23(5): 2108-16.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2018.2885134] [PMID: 30530374]
[14]
Reis S, Gazinska P, Hipwell JH, et al. Automated classification of breast cancer stroma maturity from histological images. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2017; 64(10): 2344-52.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2017.2665602] [PMID: 28186876]
[15]
Saha M, Chakraborty C. Her2Net: A deep framework for semantic segmentation and classification of cell membranes and nuclei in breast cancer evaluation. IEEE Trans Image Process 2018; 27(5): 2189-200.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2018.2795742] [PMID: 29432100]
[16]
Samala RK, Chan HP, Hadjiiski L, Helvie MA, Richter CD, Cha KH. Breast cancer diagnosis in digital breast tomosynthesis: effects of training sample size on multi-stage transfer learning using deep neural nets. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2019; 38(3): 686-96.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2018.2870343] [PMID: 31622238]
[17]
Sameti Mohammad. Image feature extraction in the last screening mammograms prior to detection of breast cancer IEEE J Signal Proces 2009; 3(1): 46-52.
[18]
Sehhati M, Mehridehnavi A, Hossein Rabbani PM, Meraj P. Stable Gene signature selection for prediction of breast cancer recurrence using joint mutual information. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinformatics 2015; 12(6): 1440-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TCBB.2015.2407407] [PMID: 26671813]
[19]
Shell J, Gregory WD. Efficient cancer detection using multiple neural networks. IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med 2017; 5: 2800607.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JTEHM.2017.2757471]
[20]
Fabio A, Luiz S, Oliveira S, et al. A Dataset for breast cancer histopathology image classification IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2016 July ; 63(7): 1455-62.
[21]
Tan T, Platel B, Mus R, Tabar L, Mann RM, Karssemeijer N. Computer-aided detection of cancer in automated 3-D breast ultrasound. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2013; 32(9): 1698-706.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2013.2263389] [PMID: 23693128]
[22]
Wang Z, Li M, et al. Breast cancer detection using extreme learning machine based on feature fusion with CNN Deep features. IEEE Access 2019; 7: 105146-58.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2892795]
[23]
Qiqigw W, Wei H, et al. A generic-driven wrapper embedded with feature-type-aware hybrid Bayesian classifier for breast cancer classification. IEEE Access 2019; 7: 119931-42.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2932505]
[24]
Yang C-H, Lin Y-D, Chuang LY, Chang HW. Evaluation of breast cancer susceptibility using improved genetic algorithms to generate genotype SNP barcodes. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinformatics 2013; 10(2): 361-71.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TCBB.2013.27] [PMID: 23929860]
[25]
Zhang X, Zhang Y, Han EY, et al. Classification of whole mammogram and tomosynthesis images using deep convolutional neural networks. IEEE Trans Nanobioscience 2018; 17(3): 237-42.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TNB.2018.2845103] [PMID: 29994219]
[26]
Ahmed N. Machraoui, Mohamed Ali Cherni, Mounir Sayadi, “Ant Colony optimization algorithm for breast cancer cells classification Proceedings of the International Conference on Electrical engineering and software applications. Tunisia. 2013.
[27]
Bilalovic O, Avdagic Z. Robust breast cancer classification based on GA optimized ANN and ANFIS-voting structures Proceedings of the international convention on information and communication technology, electronics and microelectronics. Croatia. 2018.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.23919/MIPRO.2018.8400053]
[28]
Gao S, Li H. Breast cancer diagnosis based on support vector machine Proceedings of the international conference on uncertainty reasoning and knowledge engineering. Indonesia. 2012.

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
Article Metrics
17
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy