Abstract
Aims: The importance of cathelicidin-1 as an indicator of the severity of mammary infection in ewes.
Background: Mastitis is an important disease of sheep, affecting their health and welfare.
Objective: The association of the presence of cathelicidin-1 in milk samples from ewes with mastitis with the severity of the infection.
Methods: Ewes were intramammarily inoculated with Mannheimia haemolytica or Staphylococcus chromogenes. Conventional (clinical, bacteriological and cytological examinations; milk yield measurements) and proteomics evaluation (2-DE, MALDI-TOF MS) to record cathelicidin-1 spot optical densities in milk samples were recorded.
Results: Ewes challenged with M. haemolytica developed clinical and ewes challenged with S. chromogenes subclinical mastitis (P=0.05). The challenged organism was isolated from milk samples from inoculated mammary glands; increased somatic cell counts were also recorded. Cathelicidin- 1 was detected in milk samples from the inoculated side of udders of all ewes. Mean spot density of cathelicidin-1 from samples from inoculated glands of ewes challenged with M. haemolytica was higher than from ewes challenged with S. chromogenes: 2896 ± 973 versus 1312 ± 361 (P =0.034). There were significant correlations between the presence of clinical mastitis / somatic cell counts with the spot density of cathelicidin-1 on 2-DE gels (P=0.043 and P=0.023, respectively). There was also a significant inverse correlation between the mean spot densities of cathelicidin-1 in milk samples and the milk yield of respective ewes on D10 (P =0.031).
Conclusion: Potentially, cathelicidin-1 could be used as a marker to indicate the severity of damage to the mammary parenchyma.
Keywords: Biomarker, cathelicidin-1, mastitis, mammary epithelial cells, pathogenesis, proteomics, sheep, somatic cell counts.
Graphical Abstract
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2015.07.009] [PMID: 26216457]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2019.103393] [PMID: 31154024]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/IAI.00291-13] [PMID: 23774600]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens8030134] [PMID: 31470519]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani9100726] [PMID: 31561433]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/ceji.2015.51359] [PMID: 26557038]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/IAI.01090-09] [PMID: 20100862]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetimm.2011.06.034] [PMID: 21774993]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)72679-5] [PMID: 15591384]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/vetres:2004048] [PMID: 15610720]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2019.108480] [PMID: 31767091]
[PMID: 20475467]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens8040270] [PMID: 31795190]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2019-16287] [PMID: 31400892]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511527104]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/00207713-47-2-590] [PMID: 9103655]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3] [PMID: 942051]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2016.04.008] [PMID: 27102495]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2013.12.015]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0007-1935(90)90075-E] [PMID: 2306602]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9975(08)80126-0] [PMID: 2324343]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/vetres:2004065] [PMID: 15720968]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/IAI.00040-11] [PMID: 21690237]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-10293] [PMID: 27265177]