Abstract
Background: The high permeability of Distributed Generation (DG) and the development of DC load represented by electric vehicle Battery Swapping Station (BSS) pose new challenges to the reliable and economic operation of DC distribution system.
Methods: In order to improve the wind and solar absorption rate and the reliable operation of DC distribution network and coordinate the interests and demands of BSS and DC distribution company, the upper level takes the abandonment rate and the minimum variance of BSS charging and discharging net load as two objective functions, and the lower level takes the minimum operation cost of DC distribution network and BSS as the objective function. Secondly, this paper proposes a method that combines Genetic Algorithm (GA) with Wind-Driven Optimization algorithm (WDO). CPLEX and hybrid GA-WDO are used to solve the upper and lower models, respectively.
Results: Finally, an example shows that the proposed optimization model can reduce the operation cost of DC distribution network with BSS and improve the utilization rate of wind and light, which shows the rationality and effectiveness of the optimization model.
Conclusion: In this paper, considering the randomness and uncertainty of wind power generation and photovoltaic power generation, this paper establishes the upper objective function with the minimum abandonment rate and load variance and the lower objective function with the minimum operation cost of DC distribution network and BSS operators.
Keywords: DC distribution network, battery swapping station, distributed generation abatement, double-layer model, Geneticwind driving algorithms, operation optimization.
Graphical Abstract
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2017.2691547]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2014.2344024]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2017.2768392]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/iet-smt.2015.0173]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TII.2018.2852714]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2013.2278852]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113510]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JESTPE.2016.2634026]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2016.2516566]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2013.2251667]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.05.125]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2014.2331558]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TSTE.2017.2788056]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2018.2866817]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.09.211]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.12.078]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2017.2687522]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.10.077 ]