Abstract
Background: The Yes-Associated Protein (YAP) is a central regulator of Hippo pathway involved in carcinogenesis, which functions through interaction with TEA Domain (TEAD) transcription factors. Pharmacological disruption of YAP–TEAD4 complexes has been recognized as a potential therapeutic strategy against diverse cancers by suppressing the oncogenic activity of YAP.
Objective: We systematically examine the crystal structure of YAP complex with TEAD4 and rationally identify two hotspot segments at the complex interface; they could be exploited as self-inhibitory peptides to target the complex interaction.
Methods: Two peptides, termed PS-1 and PS-2 are split from the interfacial context of YAP protein. Dynamics simulations, energetics analyses and fluorescence polarizations are employed to characterize the intrinsic disorder as well as binding energy/affinity of the two YAP peptides to TEAD4 protein.
Result: The native conformation of PS-2 peptide is a cyclic loop, which is supposed to be constrained by adding a disulfide bond across the spatially vicinal residue pair Arg87-Phe96 or Met86- Phe95 at the peptide’s two ends, consequently resulting in two intramolecular cyclized counterparts of linear PS-2 peptide, namely PS-2(cyc87,96) and PS-2(cyc86,95). The linear PS-2 peptide is determined as a weak binder of TEAD4 (Kd = 190 μM), while the two cyclic PS-2(cyc87,96) and PS-2(cyc86,95) peptides are measured to have moderate or high affinity towards TEAD4 (Kd = 21 and 45 μM, respectively).
Conclusion: PS-1 and PS-2 peptides are highly flexible and cannot maintain in native active conformation when splitting from the interfacial context, and thus would incur a considerable entropy penalty upon rebinding to the interface. Cyclization does not influence the direct interaction between PS-2 peptide and TEAD4 protein, but can largely reduce the intrinsic disorder of PS-2 peptide in free state and considerably minimize indirect entropy effect upon the peptide binding.
Keywords: Yes-associated protein, peptide, intramolecular cyclization, rational peptide design, protein-protein interaction, cancer therapy.
Graphical Abstract
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a006098] [PMID: 25833940]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2010.09.011] [PMID: 20951342]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature11693] [PMID: 23178811]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2015.2877] [PMID: 25652178]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1664408] [PMID: 18579750]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.192856.112] [PMID: 22677547]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jm501615v] [PMID: 25719868]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2014.10.003] [PMID: 25450771]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.6b00673] [PMID: 28345935]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1389200219666181012151944] [PMID: 30317994]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2014.01.010] [PMID: 24525233]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1096/fj.14-262980] [PMID: 25384421]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms17010138] [PMID: 26805820]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pro.3493] [PMID: 30058229]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.05.140] [PMID: 23871047]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystems.2013.04.004] [PMID: 23665477]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/092986611795445978] [PMID: 21413918]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/092986610790226085] [PMID: 20214647]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11696-019-00797-8]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/JSC181221029Z]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0219720016500281] [PMID: 27427383]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.comptc.2012.06.017]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C5MB00800J] [PMID: 26854254]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10822-012-9625-3] [PMID: 23306464]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bpc.2018.11.002] [PMID: 30465941]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bpc.2019.106213] [PMID: 31276987]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ci500522v] [PMID: 25643174]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21691401.2017.1360327] [PMID: 28754059]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2019.02.014] [PMID: 30802465]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1386207318666150305144015] [PMID: 25747444]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcc.10349] [PMID: 14531054]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08927022.2014.929127]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2015.1092476] [PMID: 26488421]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmgm.2010.12.005] [PMID: 21216167]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/minf.201100135] [PMID: 27476956]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2019.1709547] [PMID: 31872783]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10822-011-9474-5] [PMID: 21964565]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2016.03.027] [PMID: 27119635]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.10.141] [PMID: 30352228]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/bi9017335] [PMID: 20047332]
[PMID: 14872095]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2008.06.004] [PMID: 18602004]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/prot.22785] [PMID: 20607702]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C9MO00041K] [PMID: 31112188]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ci5000246] [PMID: 24999015]