Abstract
Background: Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) on admission was reported to be a predictor of pneumonia after stroke. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between the temporal change of NLR and post-stroke infection and whether infection modified the effect of NLR on the outcome.
Methods: We enrolled patients with acute ischemic stroke within 24 h after onset. The blood was collected on admission, day 1, 3, 7 after admission to detect white blood cells (WBC), neutrophils, and lymphocytes. Primary outcomes included pneumonia, urinary tract infection (UTI), other infection, and the secondary outcome was 3-month death.
Results: Of 798 stroke patients, 299 (37.66%) developed infection with 240 (30.23%) pneumonia, 78 (9.82%) UTI, and 9 (1.13%) other infection. The median time of infection occurrence was 48 h (interquartile range 27-74 h) after onset. NLR reached to the peak at 36 h. For all outcomes, NLR at 36 h after stroke had the highest predictive value than WBC, neutrophil, lymphocyte. NLR was independently associated with the presence of any infection (odds ratio [OR] 1.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-1.17), pneumonia (OR 1.12, 95%CI 1.05-1.19), but not UTI (OR 0.95, 95%CI 0.89-1.01). Adding infection or the interaction term did not substantially change the OR of NLR predicting 3-month death (OR 1.09, 95%CI 1.01, 1.17).
Conclusion: Increased NLR around 36 h after stroke was a predictor of infection in patients with acute ischemic stroke. The increased NLR value was associated with a higher risk of 3-month death, which was independent of poststroke infection.
Keywords: Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratios, infection, pneumonia, prognosis, stroke, biomarkers.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30500-3] [PMID: 30878104]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuint.2018.01.002] [PMID: 29317279]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.493635] [PMID: 18048864]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-11-110] [PMID: 21933425]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70061-9] [PMID: 18339349]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/NRE-161407] [PMID: 28222545]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11910-016-0679-9] [PMID: 27485944]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejim.2015.11.030] [PMID: 26723523]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2014.11.014]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijccm.IJCCM_59_18] [PMID: 30294133]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09674845.2016.1209898] [PMID: 27723441]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.009617] [PMID: 26111886]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.021228] [PMID: 29967014]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10072-019-03919-y]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12028-019-00859-5] [PMID: 31617117]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2019.116445] [PMID: 31521961]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(88)90084-4] [PMID: 3335877]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2019.06.005] [PMID: 31288133]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.026743] [PMID: 31619153]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2017.08.023]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.11.010]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.22714] [PMID: 30411816]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000347077] [PMID: 23595024]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.532085] [PMID: 19164783]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4061/2011/830614] [PMID: 21789273]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0048309] [PMID: 23118979]