Abstract
Background: The 26kDa glutathione transferase (GST, EC 2.5.1.18) from Schistosoma japonicum (SjGST) is recognized as the major detoxification enzyme of S. japonicum, a pathogenic helminth causing schistosomiasis.
Objective: In the present study, the interaction of the chlorotriazine dye Cibacron blue 3GA (CB3GA) and its structural analogues with SjGST was investigated. The work aimed to shed light on the non-substrate ligand-binding properties of the enzyme.
Methods: Kinetic inhibition analysis, affinity labelling experiments and molecular modelling studies were employed.
Results: The results showed that CB3GA is a potent inhibitor (IC50 0.057 ± 0.003 μM) towards SjGST. The enzyme was specifically and irreversibly inactivated by the dichlorotriazine-analogue of CB3GA (IC50 0.190 ± 0.024 μM), following a biphasic pseudo-first-order saturation kinetics with approximately 1 mol of inhibitor per mol of the dimeric enzyme being incorporated. All other monochlorotriazine analogues behave as reversible inhibitors with lower inhibition potency (IC50 5.2-82.3 μM). Kinetic inhibition studies, together with molecular modelling and molecular dynamics simulations, established that the CB3GA binding site overlaps both the G- and H-sites. Both hydrophobic/ polar interactions, as well as steric effects, have decisive roles in determining the inhibitory strength of CB3GA and its analogues.
Conclusion: The results of the present study might be useful in future drug design and development efforts towards SjGST.
Keywords: Affinity labelling, Cibacron Blue 3GA, Schistosoma japonicum, schistosomiasis, structure-guided drug design, triazine dyes.
Graphical Abstract
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0002865] [PMID: 25058013]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00436-012-3151-z] [PMID: 23052781]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AAC.02582-16] [PMID: 28264841]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2018.12.027] [PMID: 30578749]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.1994.51.83] [PMID: 8059919]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/bc0601727] [PMID: 17226963]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0031182000061369] [PMID: 2189115]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2005.07.077] [PMID: 16275109]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/prot.10345] [PMID: 12596270]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/10409238409102302] [PMID: 6203683]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9673(00)91244-5] [PMID: 2380311]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1044-0305(01)00257-4] [PMID: 11444603]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/BJ20040298] [PMID: 15196053]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0014-5793(85)80269-6] [PMID: 3972110]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00436-007-0836-9] [PMID: 18180958]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/s11687-008-0022-3]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2008.10.009] [PMID: 19019494]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmr.2327] [PMID: 24375581]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/BJ20060447] [PMID: 16776653]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3] [PMID: 942051]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1432-1327.2000.01761.x] [PMID: 11054119]
[PMID: 14907713]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts637] [PMID: 23104887]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.725] [PMID: 25648563]
[PMID: 14033211]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/bj20030860] [PMID: 12877654]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/BJ20150930] [PMID: 26637269]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagen.2018.12.004] [PMID: 30590099]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2013.01.038] [PMID: 23399543]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.1999.3029] [PMID: 10452896]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10930-019-09834-7] [PMID: 31004256]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10930-018-9774-x] [PMID: 29779193]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1389201019666181029103538] [PMID: 30370843]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1389201020666190409110948] [PMID: 30963969]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1872208313666190114150511] [PMID: 30648529]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/187220831204181221102552] [PMID: 30652629]