Abstract
Background: Controlling the structure of proto-oncogene telomeres is very important in antitumor therapy. There are relationships between G-quadruplex DNA and the growth of tumor cell.
Methods: In this study, spectroscopic, cyclic voltammetry and viscosity methods were employed to investigate the interaction between Zn-Arsenazo Ⅲ complex and G-quadruplex DNA by using 4S Green Plus Nucleic Acid Stain as a spectral probe in PBS buffer. The binding ratios were n Arsenazo Ⅲ : n Zn(Ⅱ) = 5:1 for Zn-Arsenazo Ⅲ complex and n Zn- Arsenazo Ⅲ : n G-quadruplex DNA = 8:1 for Zn-Arsenazo Ⅲ-G-quadruplex DNA. The bonding constants (Kθ 298.15K=4.44x105 L·mol-1, Kθ 308.15K= 1.00x105 L·mol-1, Kθ 318.15K= 1.04x106 L·mol-1) were obtained by double reciprocal method at different temperatures, Which was found that the interaction between Zn-Arsenazo Ⅲ complex and Gquadruplex DNA was driven by enthalpy. Furthermore, the research further confirmed that the interaction mode between Zn-Arsenazo Ⅲ complex and G-quadruplex DNA was a mixed binding which involved intercalation and non-intercalation interaction.
Results and Conclusion: Together these findings also have corroborated the application of stabilizing ligands and intervening with their function for target G-quadruplexes in a cellular context.
Keywords: Zn(ΙΙ)-arsenzeo ΙΙΙ complex, G-quadruplex DNA, 4S green plus nucleic acid stain, telomeres, interaction mode, proto-oncogene.
Graphical Abstract
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature755] [PMID: 12050675]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.182256799] [PMID: 12195017]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2009.05.002] [PMID: 19589679]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nchem.1548] [PMID: 23422559]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr612] [PMID: 21795379]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja205646q] [PMID: 21967482]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/26.5.1167] [PMID: 9469822]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja050823u] [PMID: 16045346]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/bi0601510] [PMID: 16784237]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrc749] [PMID: 11990855]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkl1057] [PMID: 17169996]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0959-8049(97)00062-2] [PMID: 9282118]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.03.135] [PMID: 29581003]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2015.04.003] [PMID: 25911217]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2015.11.025] [PMID: 26687022]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2017.08.005] [PMID: 28888786]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagen.2015.09.004] [PMID: 26363462]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2006.09.097] [PMID: 17049858]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2005.02.094] [PMID: 16540316]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00775-008-0352-0] [PMID: 18288506]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aoc.1200]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00958970802017646]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ica.2009.02.012]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0039-9140(61)80164-1]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2228-5547-3-9]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(96)00471-0]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.poly.2004.03.014]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2003.10.030] [PMID: 18969386]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0003-2670(95)00279-9]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(97)00100-1]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0039-9140(68)80117-1] [PMID: 18960408]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2015.02.054] [PMID: 25770966]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02757200]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10812-018-0720-7]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.bb.10.060181.000511] [PMID: 7020585]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2010.11.050] [PMID: 21176886]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2010.03.017] [PMID: 20392665]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10953-009-9438-8]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2003.11.030]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2005.04.007]