Abstract
Background: Protein misfolding is a common problem in large-scale production of recombinant proteins, which can significantly reduce the yield of the process.
Objective: In this work, we aimed at treating a cell culture broth containing high levels (>45%) of incorrectly folded Fc-fusion proteins by a simple redox buffer system in order to increase the proportion of the protein with correct conformation.
Methods: Multi-variable process optimization was firstly conducted at a small scale (25 mL), employing an experimental design methodology. After identifying the key variables using a resolution IV Fractional Factorial Design (FFD), the process was then optimized by the Central Composite Design (CCD).
Results: The optimal conditions for the refolding reaction were 340 mM Tris-base, 6.0 mM L-cysteine, 0.5 mM L-cystine, a buffer pH of 9.0, a reaction temperature of 8.5ºC and a reaction time of 24 h. Based on the treatment conditions obtained at a small scale, the process was further scaled up to 4500- L. The misfolded content was always less than 20%. The reaction can proceed well in the absence of chemical additives, such as chaotropic agents, aggregation suppressors, stabilizers and chelators.
Conclusion: The refolding process increases the fraction of active protein in the original broth reducing the burden on downstream purification steps markedly.
Keywords: Protein misfolding, protein refolding, fusion protein, recombinant DNA technology, cell culture broth composite design.
Graphical Abstract
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/dmrr.1080] [PMID: 20503261]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nri2761] [PMID: 20414204]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nri2744] [PMID: 20414205]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/mabs.2.1.10677] [PMID: 20065640]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/mabs.4.1.18719] [PMID: 22327425]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/blood-2011-08-367813] [PMID: 22246033]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/protein/gzt015] [PMID: 23571426]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0645] [PMID: 24431076]
[PMID: 3049599]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2016.06.046]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.07.116] [PMID: 28743576]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10295-011-1082-9] [PMID: 22252444]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02931984]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M605984200] [PMID: 17135263]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9673(98)00537-8] [PMID: 9770307]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9673(99)00683-4] [PMID: 10514975]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1208/s12249-010-9414-z] [PMID: 20309652]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2003.12.008] [PMID: 15036202]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2016.05.015]