Abstract
Background: Cadmium (Cd) impairs gametogenesis and damages the blood-testis barrier.
Objective: As the primary mechanism of Cd-induced damage is oxidative stress, the effects of two natural antioxidants, myo-inositol (MI) and seleno-L-methionine (Se), were evaluated in mice testes.
Methods: Eighty-four male C57 BL/6J mice were divided into twelve groups: 0.9% NaCl (vehicle; 1 ml/kg/day i.p.); Se (0.2 mg/kg/day per os); Se (0.4 mg/kg/day per os); MI (360 mg/kg/day per os); MI plus Se (0.2 mg/kg/day); MI plus Se (0.4 mg/kg/day); CdCl2 (2 mg/kg/day i.p.) plus vehicle; CdCl2 plus MI; CdCl2 plus Se (0.2 mg/kg/day); CdCl2 plus Se (0.4 mg/kg/day); CdCl2 plus MI plus Se (0.2 mg/kg/day); and CdCl2 plus MI plus Se (0.4 mg/kg/day). After 14 days, testes were processed for biochemical, structural and immunohistochemical analyses.
Results: CdCl2 increased iNOS and TNF-α expression and Malondialdehyde (MDA) levels, lowered glutathione (GSH) and testosterone, induced testicular lesions, and almost eliminated claudin-11 immunoreactivity. Se administration at 0.2 or 0.4 mg/kg significantly reduced iNOS and TNF-α expression, maintained GSH, MDA and testosterone levels, structural changes and low claudin-11 immunoreactivity. MI alone or associated with Se at 0.2 or 0.4 mg/kg significantly reduced iNOS and TNF-α expression and MDA levels, increased GSH and testosterone levels, ameliorated structural organization and increased claudin-11 patches number.
Conclusion: We demonstrated a protective effect of MI, a minor role of Se and an evident positive role of the association between MI and Se on Cd-induced damages of the testis. MI alone or associated with Se might protect testes in subjects exposed to toxicants, at least to those with behavior similar to Cd.
Keywords: Endocrine disruptors, cadmium, myo-inositol, seleno-L-methionine, testis, spermatogenesis.
Graphical Abstract
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5179-8_14] [PMID: 23430781]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12011-009-8473-z] [PMID: 19669115]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2613.2009.00692.x] [PMID: 20015210]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12011-009-8577-5] [PMID: 20012383]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfv185] [PMID: 26424772]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2007.10.004] [PMID: 18065194]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/en.2008-1741] [PMID: 19213829]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ar.21317] [PMID: 21337715]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12011-015-0449-6] [PMID: 26224376]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09603123.2013.835032] [PMID: 24117228]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbt.20354] [PMID: 20957662]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0960327112472995] [PMID: 23424207]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.etap.2005.08.006] [PMID: 21783663]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2012.07.021] [PMID: 22828241]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1096/fj.05-4192fje] [PMID: 16174787]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.240] [PMID: 20818642]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2012.03.005] [PMID: 22656408]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biochi.2013.05.011] [PMID: 23764390]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/BJ20080630] [PMID: 18498254]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/andr.12025] [PMID: 25854593]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2011.08.012] [PMID: 21924699]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.etp.2014.04.001] [PMID: 24813645]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160349] [PMID: 27486954]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2012.04.011] [PMID: 22569276]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aji.12224] [PMID: 24629031]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/neu.2004.21.1712] [PMID: 15684763]
[PMID: 5527187]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2042.2006.01654.x] [PMID: 17199863]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.105.040741] [PMID: 15944243]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2144/000113764] [PMID: 22054547]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1124/pr.110.002790] [PMID: 22039149]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2012.00152] [PMID: 22701457]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2016.01.019] [PMID: 26805443]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/JOE-10-0474] [PMID: 21471187]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2016.03.024] [PMID: 27060550]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10937400902902062] [PMID: 19466673]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/spmg.1.1.13971] [PMID: 21866273]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2016.05.017] [PMID: 27247145]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/dna.2017.3839] [PMID: 28829631]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2016.00537] [PMID: 28119612]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2183026] [PMID: 27127546]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1096/fj.201700170R] [PMID: 28592639]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2013.01.art19] [PMID: 24578993]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.etap.2014.09.014] [PMID: 25569322]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtemb.2011.08.142] [PMID: 21924884]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.18388/abp.2012_2080] [PMID: 23240106]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2009.05.012] [PMID: 19540598]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-8206.2011.00974.x] [PMID: 21819444]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2016.09.012] [PMID: 27642707]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12020-014-0477-6] [PMID: 25519493]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/13.8.2172] [PMID: 9756291]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1124/jpet.115.226936] [PMID: 26407722]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2109.2009.02283.x]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2003.09.040] [PMID: 14738912]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrd.21200] [PMID: 20578065]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2016.01.003] [PMID: 26779951]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbt.21908] [PMID: 28295929]