[1]
World Health Organization & International Programme on Chemical Safety. Biomarkers in risk assessment : Validity
and validation. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2001. Available from:. http://www.who.int/iris/handle/10665/42363
[2]
Wagner KH, Cameron-Smith D, Wessner B, et al. Biomarkers of aging: From function to molecular biology. Nutrients 2016; 8: 338.
[3]
Fadda S, López C, Vignolo G. Role of lactic acid bacteria during meat conditioning and fermentation: Peptides gener-ated as sensorial and hygienic biokers. Meat Sci 2010; 86: 66-79.
[4]
Jansson JK, Bjoèrkloèf K, Elvang AM, et al. Biomarkers for monitoring efficacy of bioremediation by microbial inoculants. Environ Pollut 2000; 107: 217-23.
[7]
Trull AW, Demers LW, Holt DW, et al. Biomarkers of disease: An evidence-based approach Cambridge. England: Cambridge University Press 2002.
[8]
Edelstein CL. Statistical considerations in analysis and interpretation of biomarkers studies.Biomarkers of kidney disease. UK: Elsevier Inc 2011.
[9]
Burkle A, Moreno-Villanueva M, Bernhard J, et al. Mark-age biomarkers of ageing. Mech Ageing Dev 2015; 151: 2-12.
[10]
Vlachopoulos C, Xaplanteris P, Aboyans V, et al. The role of vascular biomarkers for primary and secondary prevention. A position paper from the european society of cardiology working group on peripheral circulation: Endorsed by the association for research into arterial structure and physiology (artery) society. Atherosclerosis 2015; 241: 507-32.
[11]
Kabagambe EK, Judd SE, Howard VJ, et al. Inflammation biomarkers and risk of all-cause mortality in the reasons for geographic and racial differences in stroke cohort. Am J Epidemiol 2011; 174: 284-92.
[12]
Frassl W, Kowoll R, Katz N, et al. Cardiac markers (bnp, nt-pro-bnp, troponin I, troponin T, in female amateur runners before and up until three days after a marathon. Clin Lab 2008; 54: 81-7.
[13]
Mushtaq G, Greig NH, Anwar F, et al. miRNAs as circulating biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease. Med Chem 2016; 12: 217-25.
[14]
Fenech M. Important variables that influence base-line micronucleus frequency in cytokinesis-blocked lymphocytes-a biomarker for DNA damage in human populations. Mutat Res 1998; 404: 155-65.
[15]
Tomeckova V, Tόth S, Tόth T, et al. Analysis of bowel diseases from blood serum by autofluorescence and atomic force microscopy techniques. Open Chem 2018; 16(1): 238-45.
[16]
Steele J, Thorpe S, Turekian K. Pollution: Approaches to pollution control.Encyclopedia of ocean sciences. 2nd ed. US: Academic Press 2009.
[17]
Yan B, Zhou H, Gardea-Torresdey JL. Bioactivity of engineered nanoparticles. Singapore: Springer 2017.
[18]
Malik A, Grohmann E. Environmental protection strategies for sustainable development. Singapore: Springer 2012.
[19]
Snyder EG, Watkins TH, Solomon PA, et al. The changing paradigm of air pollution monitoring. Environ Sci Technol 2013; 47(20): 11369-77.
[20]
Sierra-Vargas MP, Teran LM. Air pollution: Impact and prevention. Respirology 2012; 17: 1031-8.
[21]
Steele J, Thorpe S, Turekian K. Global marine pollution.Encyclopedia of ocean sciences. 2nd ed. US: Academic Press 2009.
[23]
Dodds W, Whiles M. Responses to stress, toxic chemicals, and other pollutants in aquatic ecosystems.Freshwater ecology. 2nd ed. US: Academic Press 2010.
[25]
Parmar TK, Rawtani D, Agrawal YK. Bioindicators: The natural indicator of environmental pollution. Front Life Sci 2016; 9: 110-8.
[26]
Condello S, Calabrò E, Caccamo D, et al. Protective effects of agmatine in rotenone-induced damage of human SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells: Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy analysis in a model of Parkinson’s disease. Amino Acids 2012; 42(2-3): 775-81.
[27]
Magazù S. Bioprotective effects of sucrose and trehalose on proteins.Sucrose: Properties, biosynthesis and health implications. US: Nova Science Publishers Inc 2013; pp. 35-46.
[28]
Katsnelson BA, Privalova LI, Varaksin AN, et al. An approach to characterizing the type of combined environmental toxicity based on epidemiologically assessed exposure-response relationships. Open Epidemiol J 2011; 4: 60-9.
[29]
Magazù S, Calabrò E, Campo S. FTIR spectroscopy studies on the bioprotective effectiveness of trehalose on human hemoglobin aqueous solutions under 50 Hz electromagnetic field exposure. J Phys Chem B 2010; 114: 12144-9.
[30]
Magazù S, Calabrò E, Campo S, Interdonato S. New insights into bioprotective effectiveness of disaccharides: A FTIR study of human haemoglobin aqueous solutions exposed to static magnetic fields. J Biol Phys 2012; 38(1): 61-74.
[31]
Magazù S, Calabrò E. Studying the electromagnetic-induced changes of the secondary structure of bovine serum albu-min and the bioprotective effectiveness of trehalose by FTIR spectroscopy. J Phys Chem B 2011; 115(21): 6818-26.
[32]
Calabrò E, Magazù S. Electromagnetic fields effects on the secondary structure of lysozyme and bioprotective effective-ness of trehalose. 2012.
[33]
Calabrò E, Magazù S, Campo S. Microwave-induced increase of amide I and amide II vibration bands and modulating functions of sodium-chloride, sucrose and trehalose aqueous solutions: The case study of Haemoglobin. Res J Chem Environ 2012; 16(4): 59-67.
[35]
Calabrò E, Magazù S. Non-thermal effects of microwave oven heating on ground beef meat studied in the mid-infrared region by FTIR Spectroscopy. Spectrosc Lett An Int J Rapid Comm 2014; 47: 649-56.
[36]
Calabrò E, Magazù S. Fourier-self-deconvolution analysis of β-sheet contents in the amide I region of haemoglobin aqueous solutions under exposure to 900 MHz microwaves and bioprotective effectiveness of sugars and salt solutions. Spectrosc Lett An Int J Rapid Comm 2015; 48: 741-7.
[37]
Magazù S, Calabrò E, Caccamo MT, Cannuli A. The shielding action of disaccharides for typical proteins in aqueous solution against static, 50 Hz and 1800 MHz frequencies electromagnetic fields. Curr Chem Biol 2016; 10(1): 57-64.