Abstract
Background: Dental resin composites undergo chemical and mechanical degradation. Thus, the orthodontist should evaluate aged composite restoration surfaces to select the appropriate protocol to successfully bond orthodontics accessories.
Objective: This study evaluated the shear bond strength (σ) of metal (M) and ceramic (C) brackets bonded to aged resin-based composite restorations (ACR) after different surface treatments.
Methods: ACR specimens (N=160) were fabricated and divided into 8 experimental groups (n=20) as follows: Mo (control)- M bonded to ACR; MA- M bonded to ACR after acid etching using 38% phosphoric acid for 20 s (A); MB- M bonded to ACR after surface roughing using a twelve-bladed bur (B); MBA- M bonded to ACR after B and A; Co (control)- C bonded to ACR; CA- C bonded to ACR after A; CB- C bonded to ACR after B; CBA- C bonded to ACR after B and A. All specimens were stored for 24h before σ testing. Data were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc (α=0.05). Fracture surfaces were examined to determine the failure mode.
Results: The surface treatments (A, B and BA) produced similar σ values (p>0.05) to ACR when using the same bracket type. M bracket showed greater σ than C bracket (p<0.05), probably because of different mechanical retention inherent from bracket type. Inhomogeneous stress distribution generated complex failures.
Conclusion: Considering the needs of an orthodontic treatment and the surface treatments evaluated, sufficient bond strength was produced to ACR, irrespective of bracket type.
Keywords: Resin-based composite, ceramics, metals, aged biomaterials, ACR, orthodontic.
Graphical Abstract
[3]
Evans LS, McGrory KR, English JD, et al. A comparison of shear bond strengths among different self-etching primers. Tex Dent J 2009; 126(4): 312-9.
[4]
Sfondrini MF, Calderoni G, Vitale MC, Gandini P, Scribante A. Is laser conditioning a valid alternative to conventional etching for aesthetic bracket. Eur J Paediatr Dent 2018; 19(1): 61-6.
[5]
Costa AR, Vedovello-Filho M, Correr AB, et al. Bonding orthodontic brackets to enamel using experimental composites with an iodonium salt. Eur J Orthod 2014; 36: 297-302.
[6]
Gupta SP, Shrestha BK. Shear bond strength of a bracket-bonding system cured with a light-emitting diode or halogen-based light-curing unit at various polymerization times. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent 2018; 10: 61-7.
[7]
Pazzini CA, Pereira LJ, Marques LS, Ramos-Jorge J, Aparecida da Silva T, Paiva SM. Nickel-free vs conventional braces for patients allergic to nickel: gingival and blood parameters during and after treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2016; 150(6): 1014-9.
[8]
Godard M, Deuve B, Lopez I, Hippolyte MP, Barthélemi S. Shear bond strength of two 2-step etch-and-rinse adhesives when bonding ceramic brackets to bovine enamel. Int Orthod 2017; 15(3): 388-404.
[9]
Tonus JL, Manfroi FB, Borges GA, Grigolo EC, Helegda S, Spohr AM. Prototype to measure bracket debonding force in vivo. Dental Press J Orthod 2017; 22(1): 82-8.
[10]
Demarco FF, Corrêa MB, Cenci MS, et al. Longevity of posterior composite restorations: Not only a matter of materials. Dent Mater 2012; 28: 87-101.
[11]
Lemos CA, Mauro SJ, Santos PH, Briso AL, Fagundes TC. Influence of mechanical and chemical degradation in the surface roughness, gloss, and color of microhybrid composites. J Contemp Dent Pract 2017; 18(4): 283-8.
[12]
Lemos CA, Mauro SJ, Campos RA, Santos PH, Machado LS, Fagundes TC. Repair ability of aged resin composites mediated by different restorative system. Acta Odontol Latinoam 2016; 29(1): 7-13.
[13]
Peterson J, Rizk M, Hoch M, Wiegand A. Bonding performance of self-adhesive flowable composites to enamel, dentin and a nano-hybrid composite. Odontology 2018; 106(2): 171-80.
[14]
Shafiei F, Berahman N, Niazi E. Effect of finishing time on microleakage at the composite-repair interface. Open Dent J 2016; 10: 497-504.
[15]
Klocke A, Kahl-Nieke B. Influence of force location in orthodontic shear bond strength testing. Dent Mater 2005; 21: 391-6.
[16]
Barbosa IV, Ladewig VM, Almeida-Pedrin RR, Cardoso MA, Santiago Junior J.F., Conti ACCF. The association between patient’s compliance and age with the bonding failure of orthodontic brackets: a cross-sectional study. Prog Orthod 2018; 19(1): 11-5.
[17]
Bourke BM, Rock WP. Factors affecting the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets to porcelain. Br J Orthod 1999; 26: 285-90.
[18]
Evans LJ, Peters C, Flickinger C, et al. A comparison of shear bond strengths of orthodontic brackets using various light sources, light guides, and cure times. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002; 121: 510-5.
[19]
Pickett KL, Sadowsky PL, Jacobson A, et al. Orthodontic in vivo bond strength: comparison with in vitro results. Angle Orthod 2001; 71: 141-8.
[20]
Baka ZM, Akin M, Ileri Z, Basciftci FA. Effects of remineralization procedures on shear bond strengths of brackets bonded to demineralized enamel surfaces with self-etch systems. Angle Orthod 2016; 86(4): 661-7.
[21]
Claudino D, Kuga MC, Belizário L, Pereira JR. Enamel evaluation by scanning electron microscopy after debonding brackets and removal of adhesive remnants. J Clin Exp Dent 2018; 10(3): e248-51.
[22]
Koll M, Gwinnett AJ, Wolf MS. Shear strength of brackets bonded to anterior and posterior teeth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1986; 89: 476-9.
[23]
Khanehmasjedi M, Naseri MA, Khanehmasjedi S, Basir L. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of metallic brackets bonded with two different bonding agents under dry conditions and with saliva contamination. J Chin Med Assoc 2017; 80(2): 103-8.
[24]
Chen CS, Hsu ML, Chang KD, et al. Failure analysis: enamel fracture after debonding orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthod 2008; 78: 1071-7.
[25]
Fleming PS, Eliades T, Katsaros C, Pandis N. Curing lights for orthodontic bonding: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013; 143(4)(Suppl.): S92-S103.
[26]
Jurišić S, Jurišić G, Jurić H. Influence of adhesives and methods of enamel pretreatment on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Acta Stomatol Croat 2015; 49(4): 269-74.
[27]
Gungor AY, Alkis H, Turkkahraman H. Shear bond strengths of brackets bonded with a new self-adhering resin composite. Int J Artif Organs 2016; 39(8): 431-4.
[28]
Wongsamut W, Satrawaha S, Wayakanon K. Surface modification for bonding between amalgam and orthodontic brackets. J Orthod Sci 2017; 6(4): 129-35.
[29]
Zhang ZC, Qian YF. Yang YM1, Feng QP, Shen G. Bond strength of metal brackets bonded to a silica-based ceramic with light-cured adhesive: Influence of various surface treatment methods. J Orofac Orthop 2016; 77(5): 366-72.
[30]
Schmage P, Nergiz I, Herrmann W, Ozcan M. Influence of various surface-conditioning methods on the bond strength of metal brackets to ceramic surfaces. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003; 123(5): 540-6.
[31]
Buyuk SK, Kucukekenci AS. Effects of different etching methods and bonding procedures on shear bond strength of orthodontic metal brackets applied to different CAD/CAM ceramic materials. Angle Orthod 2018; 88(2): 221-6.
[32]
Park SB, Son WS, Ko CC, et al. Influence of flowable resins on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Dent Mater J 2009; 28(6): 730-4.
[33]
Iliadi A, Baumgartner S, Athanasiou AE, Eliades T, Eliades G. Effect of intraoral aging on the setting status of resin composite and glass ionomer orthodontic adhesives. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2014; 145(4): 425-33.
[34]
Rodrigues Junior SA, Ferracane JL, Della Bona A. Influence of surface treatments on the bond strength of repaired resin composite restorative materials. Dent Mater 2009; 25: 442-51.
[35]
Della Bona A, Van Noort R. Shear versus tensile bond strength of resin composite bonded to ceramic. J Dent Res 1995; 74: 1591-6.
[36]
Gittner R, Müller-Hartwich R, Engel S, Jost-Brinkmann PG. Shear bond strength and enamel fracture behavior of ceramic brackets Fascination® and Fascination®2. J Orofac Orthop 2012; 73: 49-57.
[37]
Bakhadher W, Halawany H, Talic N, Abraham N, Jacob V. Factors affecting the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets - A review of in vitro studies. Acta Med (Hradec Kralove) 2015; 58(2): 43-8.
[38]
Ousehal L, El Aouame A, Rachdy Z, Benkiran G. Comparison of the efficacy of a conventional primer and a self-etching primer. Int Orthod 2016; 14(2): 195-205.
[39]
Eliades T, Brantley WA. Orthodontics materials, scientific and clinical aspects. Stuttgart: Thieme 2001; p. 310.
[40]
Boscato N, Della Bona A, Del Bel Cury A. Influence of ceramic pre-treatments on tensile bond strength and mode of failure of resin bonded to ceramics. Am J Dent 2007; 20: 103-8.
[41]
Knox J, Jones ML, Hubsch P, Middleton J, Kralj B. An evaluation of the stresses generated in a bonded orthodontic attachment by three different loadcases using the finite element method of stress analysis. J Orthod 2000; 27(1): 39-46.
[42]
Eslamian L, Borzabadi-Farahani A, Mousavi N, Ghasemi A. A comparative study of shear bond strength between metal and ceramic brackets and artificially aged composite restorations using different surface treatments. Eur J Orthod 2012; 34(5): 610-7.
[43]
Bayram M, Yesilyurt C, Kusgöz A, Ulker M, Nur M. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets to aged resin composite surfaces: effect of surface conditioning. Eur J Orthod 2011; 33(2): 174-9.
[44]
Demirtas HK, Akin M, Ileri Z, Basciftci FA. Shear-bond-strength of orthodontic brackets to aged nano-hybrid composite-resin surfaces using different surface preparation. Dent Mater J 2015; 34(1): 86-90.
[45]
Swartz ML. Limitations of in vitro orthodontic bond strength testing. J Clin Orthod 2007; 41: 207-10.
[46]
Mirzakouchaki B, Shirazi S, Sharghi R, Shirazi S, Moghimi M, Shahrbaf S. Shear bond strength and debonding characteristics of metal and ceramic brackets bonded with conventional acid-etch and self-etch primer systems: An in-vivo study. J Clin Exp Dent 2016; 8(1): e38-43.
[47]
Wang WN, Li CH, Chou TH, et al. Bond strength of various bracket base designs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004; 125: 65-70.
[48]
Jurubeba JEP, Costa AR, Correr-Sobrinho L, et al. Influence of thermal cycles number on bond strength of metallic brackets to ceramic. Braz Dent J 2017; 28(2): 206-9.
[49]
Bishara SE, Soliman MM, Oonsombat C, et al. The effect of variation in mesh-base design on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthod 2004; 74: 400-4.
[50]
Sharma-Sayal SK, Rossouw PE, Kulkarni GV, et al. The influence of orthodontic bracket base design on shear bond strength. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003; 124: 74-82.
[52]
Sorel O, El Alam R, Chagneau F, Cathelineau G. Comparison of bond strength between simple foil mesh and laser-structured base retention brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002; 122(3): 260-6.
[53]
Costenoble A, Vennat E, Attal JP, Dursun E. Bond strength and interfacial morphology of orthodontic brackets bonded to eroded enamel treated with calcium silicate-sodium phosphate salts or resin infiltration. Angle Orthod 2016; 86(6): 909-16.
[54]
Mirzakouchaki B, Kimyai S, Hydari M, Shahrbaf S, Mirzakouchaki-Boroujeni P. Effect of self-etching primer/adhesive and conventional bonding on the shear bond strength in metallic and ceramic brackets. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2012; 17(1): e164-70.
[55]
Arash V, Naghipour F, Ravadgar M, Karkhah A, Barati MS. Shear bond strength of ceramic and metallic orthodontic brackets bonded with self-etching primer and conventional bonding adhesives. Electron Physician 2017; 9(1): 3584-91.
[56]
Daratsianos N, Musabegovic E, Reimann S, et al. The influence of cyclic shear fatigue on the bracket-adhesive-enamel complex: an in vitro study. Dent Mater 2013; 29: 506-13.
[57]
Faria e Silva AL, Covell DA Jr, Ferracane JL, Pfeifer CS. Effectiveness of high irradiance for short-time exposures on polymerization of composite under metal brackets. Angle Orthod 2017; 87(6): 834-40.
[58]
Seeliger JH, Botzenhart UU, Gedrange T, Kozak K, Stepien L, Machoy M. Enamel shear bond strength of different primers combined with an orthodontic adhesive paste. Biomed Tech (Berl) 2017; 62(4): 415-20.
[59]
Baeshen H, Alturki BN, Albishi WW, Alsadi FM, El-Tubaigy KM. Mechanical and physical properties of two different resin-based materials: a comparative study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2017; 18(10): 905-10.
[60]
Hellak A, Ebeling J, Schauseil M, Stein S, Roggendorf M, Korbmacher-Steiner H. Shear bond strength of three orthodontic bonding systems on enamel and restorative materials. BioMed Res Int 2016; 2016: 6307107.
[61]
Montasser MA. Effect of applying a sustained force during bonding orthodontic brackets on the adhesive layer and on shear bond strength. Eur J Orthod 2011; 33(4): 402-6.
[62]
Jain M, Shetty S, Mogra S, Shetty VS, Dhakar N. Determination of optimum adhesive thickness using varying degrees of force application with light-cured adhesive and its effect on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets: an in vitro study. Orthodontics (Chic) 2013; 14(1): e40-9.
[63]
Piccoli L, Migliau G, Besharat LK, Di Carlo S, Pompa G, Di Giorgio R. Comparison of two different debonding techniques in orthodontic treatment. Ann Stomatol (Roma) 2017; 8(2): 71-8.
[64]
Cochrane NJ, Lo TWG, Adams GG, Schneider PM. Quantitative analysis of enamel on debonded orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2017; 152(3): 312-9.
[65]
Della Bona A. Bonding to ceramics: scientific evidences for clinical dentistry. São Paulo: Artes Médicas 2009; p. 252.
[66]
Cumerlato M, Lima EM, Osorio LB, Mota EG, Menezes LM, Rizzatto SMD. Effect of surface treatment of prefabricated teeth on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Dental Press J Orthod 2017; 22(4): 47-52.
[67]
Dias FM, Pinzan-Vercelino CR, Tavares RR, Gurgel Jde A, Bramante FS, Fialho MN. Evaluation of an alternative technique to optimize direct bonding of orthodontic brackets to temporary crowns. Dental Press J Orthod 2015; 20(4): 57-62.
[68]
Stella JP, Oliveira AB, Nojima LI, Marquezan M. Four chemical methods of porcelain conditioning and their influence over bond strength and surface integrity. Dental Press J Orthod 2015; 20(4): 51-6.
[69]
Sperber RL, Watson PA, Rossouw PE, Sectakof PA. Adhesion of bonded orthodontic attachments to dental amalgam: In vitro study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999; 116(5): 506-13.
[70]
Zachrisson BU. Orthodontic bonding to artificial tooth surfaces: Clinical versus laboratory findings. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000; 117: 592-4.
[71]
Vidor MM, Felix RP, Marchioro EM, Hahn L. Enamel surface evaluation after bracket debonding and different resin removal methods. Dental Press J Orthod 2015; 20(2): 61-7.
[72]
Baherimoghadam T, Akbarian S, Rasouli R, Naseri N. Evaluation of enamel damages following orthodontic bracket debonding in fluorosed teeth bonded with adhesion promoter. Eur J Dent 2016; 10(2): 193-8.
[73]
Rodríguez-Chávez JA, Arenas-Alatorre J, Belio-Reyes I. Comparative study of dental enamel loss after debonding braces by analytical scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Microsc Res Tech 2017; 80(7): 680-6.
Related Books
Frontiers in Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine Research
Frontiers in Clinical Drug Research - CNS and Neurological Disorders
Frontiers in Clinical Drug Research - Anti-Cancer Agents
Frontiers in Clinical Drug Research: Anti-Infectives
Frontiers in Anti-Infective Drug Discovery
Frontiers in Clinical Drug Research - CNS and Neurological Disorders
Coronaviruses
Recent Advances in Anesthesiology
Modern Occupational Diseases Diagnosis, Epidemiology, Management and Prevention
COVID-19: Effects in Comorbidities and Special Populations
Article Metrics
35
4