Generic placeholder image

Current Medical Imaging

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 1573-4056
ISSN (Online): 1875-6603

Research Article

Cribriform Plate, Crista Galli, Olfactory Fossa and Septal Deviation

Author(s): Mehmet Hamdi Şahan, Mikail Inal, Nuray Bayar Muluk* and Gökçe Şimşek

Volume 15, Issue 3, 2019

Page: [319 - 325] Pages: 7

DOI: 10.2174/1573405614666180314150237

Price: $65

Abstract

Objectives: In the present study, we investigated the relationship between olfactory fossa, cribriform plate, crista galli and nasal Septal Deviation (SD). Keros classification of olfactory fossa was also performed.

Methods: This study was performed retrospectively. Computerized Tomography (CT) images of 200 adult subjects were observed. Unilateral nasal Septal Deviation (SD) cases were included into the study. On coronal CT scans, SD side and location, SD angle, cribriform plate width, olfactory fossa depth (Keros classification) and width, area of the olfactory fossa, crista galli length, width and pneumatization were evaluated.

Results: Anterior and anteroposterior deviations were detected mainly. In females, 64.0% and in males, 45.3% of the SDs were located anteriorly. In males, anteroposterior SDs (40.0%) were detected more than females. In anteroposterior SDs, SD angle was higher than anterior SDs. With higher SD angle, crista galli width and height decreased. Cribriform plate width, olfactory fossa height, width and area values of contralateral side were significantly higher than those of the ipsilateral side. For Keros classification, in male group, type 1 (53.3%) and in females, type 2 (57.6%) was detected at ipsilateral side. For contralateral side, type 2 Keros was detected in both genders. Complete crista galli pneumatization was observed in 4.0% and partial pneumatization was detected in 12.0%. In 84% of the patients, there is no Crista galli pneumatization. With the presence of pneumatized crista galli, contralateral Keros values decreased. Crista galli height and contralateral olfactory fossa width showed positive correlation. In older patients, cribriform plate width decreased.

Conclusion: In our study, there was no Keros type 3 olfactory fossa. In males’ contralateral side of SD; and in females both ipsilateral and contralateral side of SD, Keros type 2 olfactory fossa were detected. Therefore, during sinus surgery, surgeons should work carefully not to made intracranial penetration.

Keywords: Olfactory fossa, cribriform plate, crista galli, nasal septal deviation, Keros classification, CT.

Graphical Abstract

[1]
Stankiewicz JA, Lal D, Connor M, Welch K. Complications in endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis: A 25-year experience. Laryngoscope 2011; 121(12): 2684-701.
[2]
Siedek V, Pilzweger E, Betz C, Berghaus A, Leunig A. Complications in endonasal sinus surgery: A 5-year retrospective study of 2,596 patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2013; 270(1): 141-8.
[3]
Skorek A, Tretiakow D, Szmuda T, Przewozny T. Is the Keros classification alone enough to identify patients with the ‘dangerous ethmoid’? An anatomical study. Acta Oto-Laryngologica 2017; 137(2): 196-201.
[4]
Keros P. On the practical value of differences in the level of the lamina cribrosa of the ethmoid [in German]. Z Laryngol Rhinol Otol 1962; 41: 809-13.
[5]
Elwany S, Medanni A, Eid M, Aly A, El-Daly A, Ammar SR. Radiological observations on the olfactory fossa and ethmoid roof. J Laryngol Otol 2010; 124(12): 1251-6.
[6]
Basak S, Karaman CZ, Akdilli A, Mutlu C, Odabasi O, Erpek G. Evaluation of some important anatomical variations and dangerous areas of the paranasal sinuses by CT for safer endonasal surgery. Rhinology 1998; 36(4): 162-7.
[7]
Ikeda A. Volumetric measurement of the maxillary sinus by coronal CT scan. Nippon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho 1996; 99(8): 1136-43.
[8]
Inal M, Bayar Muluk N, Arikan OK, Şahin S. Is there a relationship between keros classification of olfactory fossae depth, septal deviation angle and the distance between infraorbital foramens? Curr Med Imaging Rev 2017; 14(6): 788-97.
[9]
Kaplanoglu H, Kaplanoglu V, Dilli A, Toprak U, Hekimoğlu B. An analysis of the anatomic variations of the paranasal sinuses and ethmoid roof using computed tomography. Eurasian J Med 2013; 45(2): 115-25.
[10]
Dessi P, Castro F, Triglia JM, Zanaret M, Cannoni M. Major complications of sinus surgery: A review of 1192 procedures. J Laryngol Otol 1994; 108(3): 212-5.
[11]
Alazzawi S, Omar R, Rahmat K, Alli K. Radiological analysis of the ethmoid roof in the Malaysian population. Auris Nasus Larynx 2012; 39(4): 393-6.
[12]
Stammberger HR, Kennedy DW. Anatomic Terminology Group. Paranasal sinuses: anatomic terminology and nomenclature. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1995; 167: 7-16.
[13]
Keros P. On the practical importance of differences in the level of the cribriform plate of the ethmoid. Laryngol Otol (Stuttg) 1965; 41: 808-13.
[14]
Som PM, Park EE, Naidich TP, Lawson V. Crista galli pneumatization is an extension of the adjacent frontal sinuses. Am J Neuroradiol 2009; 30: 31-3.
[15]
Socher JA, Santos PG, Correa VC. de Barros e Silva LC. Endoscopic surgery in the treatment of crista galli pneumatization evolving with localized frontal headaches. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2013; 17(3): 246-50.
[16]
Kim JJ, Cho JH, Choi JW, et al. Morphologic analysis of crista galli using computed tomography. J Rhinol 2012; 19(2): 91-5.
[17]
Al Quadah MS. Anatomical variations in sino-nasal region: A computer tomography (CT) study. J Med J 2010; 44(3): 290-7.
[18]
Poje G, Mladina R, Skitarelic N, Marjanovic KM. Some radiological and clinical aspects of the sinus cristae galli. Roman J Rhinol 2014; 13(4): 31-6.
[19]
Manea C, Mladina R. Crista galli sinusitis-a radiological impression or a real clinical entity. Roman J Rhinol 2016; 23(6): 167-7.
[20]
Mladina R, Antunović R, Cingi C, Muluk NB, Skitarelić N, Malić M. An anatomical study of pneumatized crista galli. Neurosurg Rev 2017; 40(4): 671-8.
[21]
Saglam M, Salihoglu M, Tekeli H, Altundag A, Sivrioglu AK, Cayonu M. Is there an association between olfactory bulb volume and the Keros type of fossa olfactoria? J Craniofac 2014; 25(4): 1273-6.
[22]
Souza SA, Souza MM, Idagawa M, Wolosker A, Ajzen S. Computed tomography assessment of the ethmoid roof: A relevant region at risk in endoscopic sinus surgery. Radiols 2008; 41: 143-7.
[23]
Stammberger HR, Kennedy DW. Paranasal sinuses: Anatomicterminology and nomenclature. The AnatomicTerminology Group. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1995; 167: 7-16.
[24]
Ohnishi T, Tachibana T, Kaneko Y, Esaki S. High-risk areasin endoscopic sinus surgery and prevention of complications. Laryngoscope 1993; 103: 1181-5.
[25]
Ohnishi T, Yanagisawa E. Lateral lamella of the cribriformplate – an important high-risk area in endoscopic sinussurgery. Ear Nose Throat J 1995; 74: 688-90.
[26]
Dessi P, Moulin G, Triglia JM, Zanaret M, Cannoni M. Difference in the height of the right and left ethmoidal roofs A possible risk factor for ethmoidal surgery Prospective study of 150 CT scans. J Laryngol Otol 1994; 108: 261.
[27]
Uma Devi Murali Appavoo Reddy and Bhawna Dev. Pictorial essay: Anatomical variations of paranasal sinuses on multidetector computed tomography-How does it help FESS surgeons? Indian J Radiol Imaging 2012; 22(4): 317-24.
[28]
Naunheim MR, Sedaghat AR, Lin DT, et al. Immediate and delayed complications following endoscopic sinus surgery. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2015; 76: 390-6.
[29]
Dessi P, Moulin G, Triglia JM, Zanaret M, Cannoni M. Differencein the height of the right and left ethmoidal roofs. A possible riskfactor for ethmoidal surgery. Prospective study of 150 CT scans. J Laryngol Otol 1994; 108: 261.

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy