Generic placeholder image

Current Medical Imaging

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 1573-4056
ISSN (Online): 1875-6603

Research Article

LNTP-MDBN: Big Data Integrated Learning Framework for Heterogeneous Image Set Classification

Author(s): D. Franklin Vinod* and V. Vasudevan

Volume 15, Issue 2, 2019

Page: [227 - 236] Pages: 10

DOI: 10.2174/1573405613666170721103949

Price: $65

Abstract

Background: With the explosive growth of global data, the term Big Data describes the enormous size of dataset through the detailed analysis. The big data analytics revealed the hidden patterns and secret correlations among the values. The major challenges in Big data analysis are due to increase of volume, variety, and velocity. The capturing of images with multi-directional views initiates the image set classification which is an attractive research study in the volumetricbased medical image processing.

Methods: This paper proposes the Local N-ary Ternary Patterns (LNTP) and Modified Deep Belief Network (MDBN) to alleviate the dimensionality and robustness issues. Initially, the proposed LNTP-MDBN utilizes the filtering technique to identify and remove the dependent and independent noise from the images. Then, the application of smoothening and the normalization techniques on the filtered image improves the intensity of the images.

Results: The LNTP-based feature extraction categorizes the heterogeneous images into different categories and extracts the features from each category. Based on the extracted features, the modified DBN classifies the normal and abnormal categories in the image set finally.

Conclusion: The comparative analysis of proposed LNTP-MDBN with the existing pattern extraction and DBN learning models regarding classification accuracy and runtime confirms the effectiveness in mining applications.

Keywords: Big data, deep belief network, heterogeneous data, image set classification, local ternary patterns, pattern recognition.

Graphical Abstract

[1]
Hayat M, Bennamoun M, An S. Deep reconstruction models for image set classification. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 2015; 37: 713-27.
[2]
Zheng P, Zhao Z-Q, Gao J, Wu X. Image set classification based on cooperative sparse representation. Patt Recogn 2017; 63: 206-17.
[3]
Roy S, Carass A, Prince JL, Pham DL. Subject specific sparse dictionary learning for atlas based brain MRI segmentation. Mach Learn Med Imaging 2014; 8679: 248-55.
[4]
Hayat M, Bennamoun M, An S. Reverse training: An efficient approach for image set classification. In: Fleet D, Pajdla T, Schiele B, Tuytelaars T (eds) Computer vision-ECCV 2014 Computer vision-ECCV 2014. Lecture notes in computer science; vol 8694. Springer, Cham 2014.
[5]
Zhang L, Liang Q, Shen Y, Yang M, Liu F. Image set classification based on synthetic examples and reverse training. Neurocomputing 2016; 228: 3-10.
[6]
Hossain MA, Jia X, Benediktsson JA. One-class oriented feature selection and classification of heterogeneous remote sensing images. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Ear Observ Rem Sens 2016; 9: 1606-12.
[7]
Zou Q, Ni L, Zhang T, Wang Q. Deep learning based feature selection for remote sensing scene classification. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett 2015; 12: 2321-5.
[8]
Ibrahim R, Yousri NA, Ismail MA, El-Makky NM. Multi-level gene/MiRNA feature selection using deep belief nets and active learning. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2014; 2014: 3957-60 2014; pp 3957-60.
[9]
Shi T, Zhang C, Li F, Liu W, Huo M. Application of alternating deep belief network in image classification. In: Chinese Control and Decision Conference (CCDC) 2016 Yinchuan, China. 1853-6.
[10]
Murala S, Maheshwari R, Balasubramanian R. Local tetra patterns: A new feature descriptor for content-based image retrieval. IEEE Trans Image Process 2012; 21: 2874-86.
[11]
Wang S, Wu Q, He X, Yang J, Wang Y. Local N-Ary pattern and its extension for texture classification. IEEE Trans Circ Syst Video Tech 2015; 25: 1495-506.
[12]
Chen S, Sanderson C, Harandi MT, Lovell BC. Improved image set classification via joint sparse approximated nearest subspaces.In: IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 2013; IEEE, Portland, OR, USA 2013; pp. 452-9.
[13]
Tan H, Ma Z, Zhang S, Zhan Z, Zhang B, Zhang C. Grassmann manifold for nearest points image set classification. Pattern Recognit Lett 2015; 68: 190-6.
[14]
Yuan H, Tang YY. Sparse representation based on set-to-set distance for hyperspectral image classification. IEEE J Select Top Appl Ear Observ Rem Sens 2015; 8: 2464-72.
[15]
Elaiwat S, Bennamoun M, Boussaid F. A semantic RBM-based model for image set classification. Neurocomputing 2016; 205: 507-18.
[16]
Gao S, Zeng Z, Jia K, Chan T-H, Tang J. Patch-set-based representation for alignment-free image set classification IEEE Trans Circ Sys Vid Technol; 26: 1646-58.
[17]
Anitha V, Murugavalli S. Brain tumour classification using two-tier classifier with adaptive segmentation technique. IET Comput Vis 2016; 10: 9-17.
[18]
Huang SY, Hou L, Wu J. MRI-Based electrical property retrieval by applying the Finite-Element Method (FEM). IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech 2015; 63: 2482-90.
[19]
Subrahmanyam M, Maheshwari R, Balasubramanian R. Local maximum edge binary patterns: A new descriptor for image retrieval and object tracking. Signal Processing 2012; 92: 1467-79.
[20]
Papakostas GA, Koulouriotis DE, Karakasis EG, Tourassis VD. Moment-based local binary patterns: A novel descriptor for invariant pattern recognition applications. Neurocomputin 2013; 99: 358-71.
[21]
Lu J, Wang G, Moulin P. Localized multifeature metric learning for image-set-based face recognition. IEEE Trans Circ Syst Video Tech 2016; 26: 529-40.
[22]
Nanni L, Brahnam S, Lumini A. A simple method for improving local binary patterns by considering non-uniform patterns. Patt Recogn 2012; 45: 3844-52.
[23]
Zhang J, Liang J, Zhao H. Local energy pattern for texture classification using self-adaptive quantization thresholds. IEEE Trans Image Process 2013; 22: 31-42.
[24]
Murala S, Wu QJ. Local ternary co-occurrence patterns: A new feature descriptor for MRI and CT image retrieval. Neurocomputing 2013; 119: 399-412.
[25]
Liu D, Wang S, Huang D, Deng G, Zeng F, Chen H. Medical image classification using spatial adjacent histogram based on adaptive local binary patterns. Comput Biol Med 2016; 72: 185-200.
[26]
Yuan F, Shi J, Xia X, Fang Y, Fang Z, Mei T. High-order local ternary patterns with locality preserving projection for smoke detection and image classification. Inf Sci 2016; 372: 225-40.
[27]
Papa JP, Scheirer W, Cox DD. Fine-tuning deep belief networks using harmony search. Appl Soft Comput 2016; 46: 875-85.
[28]
Tang B, Liu X, Lei J, et al. Deepchart: Combining deep convolutional networks and deep belief networks in chart classification. Signal Processing 2016; 124: 156-61.
[29]
Ma X, Wang H, Geng J, Wang J. Hyperspectral image classification with small training set by deep network and relative distance prior IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS) 2016. IEEE: Beijing, China: pp. 3282-5.
[30]
Jang H, Plis SM, Calhoun VD, Lee J-H. Task-specific feature extraction and classification of fMRI volumes using a deep neural network initialized with a deep belief network: Evaluation using sensorimotor tasks. Neuroimage 2017; 145: 314-28.
[31]
Zhao Z, Jiao L, Zhao J, Gu J, Zhao J. Discriminant deep belief network for high-resolution SAR image classification. Patt Recogn 2017; 61: 686-701.
[33]
Suckling J, Parker J, Dance D, et al. Mammographic Image Analysis Society (MIAS) database v1.21 [Dataset] 2015. Available from: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/
[34]
Zou Q, Cao Y, Li Q, Huang C, Wang S. Chronological classification of ancient paintings using appearance and shape features. Pattern Recognit Lett 2014; 49: 146-54.

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy