Abstract
Background: Coronary bifurcated lesions (CBL) represent a hot topic of interventional cardiology. Provisional stenting, i.e. implantation of a drug-eluting (DES) in the main branch followed by side-branch (SB) intervention in case of suboptimal SB result, represents the gold standard to treat the vast majority of CBL undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). The best technique for bail-out SB stenting has not been established. Prospective randomized trials comparing different stenting techniques may help provide important insights regarding the best way to conduct PCI in patients with CBL.
Methods: The recently published Bifurcations Bad Krozingen (BBK) II trial is the last important randomized study in the field of bifurcation PCI and is focused on the search for the best management of those patients with suboptimal SB result during provisional stenting. Two different SB implantation strategies after provisional stenting have been compared. In the present manuscript, we employed BBK II results in the context of available literature highlighting important specific features of the study with main emphasis on patient selection process and techniques applied.
Keywords: Bifurcated lesions, culotte stenting, drug-eluting stent, percutaneous coronary interventions, TAP stenting.
Graphical Abstract
Reviews on Recent Clinical Trials
Title:Treatment of Bifurcation Lesions by Bail-Out TAP or Culotte: Lost in Translation?
Volume: 12 Issue: 3
Author(s): Francesco Burzotta*, Thierry Lefevre, Jens Flensted Lassen, Niels Ramsing Holm and Goran Stankovic
Affiliation:
- Institute of Cardiology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, 00168 Rome,Italy
Keywords: Bifurcated lesions, culotte stenting, drug-eluting stent, percutaneous coronary interventions, TAP stenting.
Abstract: Background: Coronary bifurcated lesions (CBL) represent a hot topic of interventional cardiology. Provisional stenting, i.e. implantation of a drug-eluting (DES) in the main branch followed by side-branch (SB) intervention in case of suboptimal SB result, represents the gold standard to treat the vast majority of CBL undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). The best technique for bail-out SB stenting has not been established. Prospective randomized trials comparing different stenting techniques may help provide important insights regarding the best way to conduct PCI in patients with CBL.
Methods: The recently published Bifurcations Bad Krozingen (BBK) II trial is the last important randomized study in the field of bifurcation PCI and is focused on the search for the best management of those patients with suboptimal SB result during provisional stenting. Two different SB implantation strategies after provisional stenting have been compared. In the present manuscript, we employed BBK II results in the context of available literature highlighting important specific features of the study with main emphasis on patient selection process and techniques applied.
Export Options
About this article
Cite this article as:
Burzotta Francesco*, Lefevre Thierry, Lassen Flensted Jens , Holm Ramsing Niels and Stankovic Goran, Treatment of Bifurcation Lesions by Bail-Out TAP or Culotte: Lost in Translation?, Reviews on Recent Clinical Trials 2017; 12 (3) . https://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1574887112666170426143732
DOI https://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1574887112666170426143732 |
Print ISSN 1574-8871 |
Publisher Name Bentham Science Publisher |
Online ISSN 1876-1038 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/20b38/20b3839dc9ef0373594eb7d6c026fdc74274c206" alt=""
- Author Guidelines
- Bentham Author Support Services (BASS)
- Graphical Abstracts
- Fabricating and Stating False Information
- Research Misconduct
- Post Publication Discussions and Corrections
- Publishing Ethics and Rectitude
- Increase Visibility of Your Article
- Archiving Policies
- Peer Review Workflow
- Order Your Article Before Print
- Promote Your Article
- Manuscript Transfer Facility
- Editorial Policies
- Allegations from Whistleblowers