Abstract
A recent decision of the Italian Constitutional Court has legitimized for the first time heterologous artificial insemination. On April 9th, 2014 the “Consulta” declared unconstitutional the sections of law n. 40 of 19 February 2004 (Judgment n. 162/2014), which prohibited heterologous fertilization: a) section 4 paragraph 3 “It is forbidden the use of techniques of medically assisted procreation of the heterologous type”; b) section 9, paragraphs 1 and 3, which include the prohibition of the disclaimer of paternity and the anonymity of the mother; c) section 12, paragraph 1, which includes penalties for anyone who uses for procreation purposes, gametes from subjects outside the applicant couple. In the present paper the Authors reviewed the recent judgment of the Constitutional Court of April 9th, 2014, trying to evaluate the impact that it could have on Italian society. Secondly, the Authors have administered via internet a questionnaire to a cohort composed of 9000 Gynecologists and other specialists, regarding law n. 40/2004, their opinion of heterologous fertilization, the judgment of the Constitutional Court and the influence of the Catholic Church in Italy. Finally, a brief overview of laws in the field of heterologous fertilization among the European Union States has been provided.
Keywords: Heterologous fertilization, Italian Constitutional Court, questionnaire, medically assisted reproduction, gametes, artificial reproduction.
Current Pharmaceutical Biotechnology
Title:Heterologous Fertilization: the Opinion of Italian Physicians and a Brief European Overview
Volume: 17 Issue: 4
Author(s): Simona Zaami, Francesco P. Busardò, Alessandro Santurro, Mariantonia Di Sanzo, Susanna Agostini, Giovanni Baglio and Paola Frati
Affiliation:
Keywords: Heterologous fertilization, Italian Constitutional Court, questionnaire, medically assisted reproduction, gametes, artificial reproduction.
Abstract: A recent decision of the Italian Constitutional Court has legitimized for the first time heterologous artificial insemination. On April 9th, 2014 the “Consulta” declared unconstitutional the sections of law n. 40 of 19 February 2004 (Judgment n. 162/2014), which prohibited heterologous fertilization: a) section 4 paragraph 3 “It is forbidden the use of techniques of medically assisted procreation of the heterologous type”; b) section 9, paragraphs 1 and 3, which include the prohibition of the disclaimer of paternity and the anonymity of the mother; c) section 12, paragraph 1, which includes penalties for anyone who uses for procreation purposes, gametes from subjects outside the applicant couple. In the present paper the Authors reviewed the recent judgment of the Constitutional Court of April 9th, 2014, trying to evaluate the impact that it could have on Italian society. Secondly, the Authors have administered via internet a questionnaire to a cohort composed of 9000 Gynecologists and other specialists, regarding law n. 40/2004, their opinion of heterologous fertilization, the judgment of the Constitutional Court and the influence of the Catholic Church in Italy. Finally, a brief overview of laws in the field of heterologous fertilization among the European Union States has been provided.
Export Options
About this article
Cite this article as:
Zaami Simona, Busardò P. Francesco, Santurro Alessandro, Di Sanzo Mariantonia, Agostini Susanna, Baglio Giovanni and Frati Paola, Heterologous Fertilization: the Opinion of Italian Physicians and a Brief European Overview, Current Pharmaceutical Biotechnology 2016; 17 (4) . https://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1389201017666151231095348
DOI https://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1389201017666151231095348 |
Print ISSN 1389-2010 |
Publisher Name Bentham Science Publisher |
Online ISSN 1873-4316 |

- Author Guidelines
- Bentham Author Support Services (BASS)
- Graphical Abstracts
- Fabricating and Stating False Information
- Research Misconduct
- Post Publication Discussions and Corrections
- Publishing Ethics and Rectitude
- Increase Visibility of Your Article
- Archiving Policies
- Peer Review Workflow
- Order Your Article Before Print
- Promote Your Article
- Manuscript Transfer Facility
- Editorial Policies
- Allegations from Whistleblowers