Abstract
To effectively characterise and distinguish between different organic matter samples, multiple chemical characterisation techniques are often employed. Due to the structural complexity of organic matter and the unique information provided by different characterisation techniques, it is often difficult to compare and combine data obtained from different analytical methods. In this study, we show how non-parametric multivariate statistical approaches can be used to compare the relative pattern of similarity/dissimilarity between organic samples characterised by two common solid-state analytical techniques: 13C nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and flash pyrolysis-gas chromatography mass spectrometry (py-GCMS). These analytical methods were used to characterise a suite of plant residues including the leaf, flower, bark and wood of several species. Using non-parametric multivariate statistical approaches we identified similarities between the plant residue data using ordination plots, which enabled us to identify where NMR and py-GCMS distinguished between residues differently. A mantel-type test called RELATE showed that there was significant (P<0.05) similarity between the NMR and py-GCMS data in terms of their ability to differentiate between plant residues of different type; 61% of the sample discrimination was common to both profiling techniques, while 39% of discrimination was method specific. Further multivariate comparisons indicated that NMR was more sensitive to detecting differences in the organic composition of the plant residues.
Keywords: Multivariate statistics, NMR, Organic matter, Plant residue, Pyrolysis, RELATE, Resemblance.
Current Organic Chemistry
Title:The Organic Chemistry of Plant Residues: Comparison Of NMR and Pyrolysis Data Using Multivariate Statistical Approaches
Volume: 17 Issue: 24
Author(s): Emma L. Plant, Ronald Smernik, Paul Greenwood, Lynne M. Macdonald and John van Leeuwen
Affiliation:
Keywords: Multivariate statistics, NMR, Organic matter, Plant residue, Pyrolysis, RELATE, Resemblance.
Abstract: To effectively characterise and distinguish between different organic matter samples, multiple chemical characterisation techniques are often employed. Due to the structural complexity of organic matter and the unique information provided by different characterisation techniques, it is often difficult to compare and combine data obtained from different analytical methods. In this study, we show how non-parametric multivariate statistical approaches can be used to compare the relative pattern of similarity/dissimilarity between organic samples characterised by two common solid-state analytical techniques: 13C nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and flash pyrolysis-gas chromatography mass spectrometry (py-GCMS). These analytical methods were used to characterise a suite of plant residues including the leaf, flower, bark and wood of several species. Using non-parametric multivariate statistical approaches we identified similarities between the plant residue data using ordination plots, which enabled us to identify where NMR and py-GCMS distinguished between residues differently. A mantel-type test called RELATE showed that there was significant (P<0.05) similarity between the NMR and py-GCMS data in terms of their ability to differentiate between plant residues of different type; 61% of the sample discrimination was common to both profiling techniques, while 39% of discrimination was method specific. Further multivariate comparisons indicated that NMR was more sensitive to detecting differences in the organic composition of the plant residues.
Export Options
About this article
Cite this article as:
Plant L. Emma, Smernik Ronald, Greenwood Paul, Macdonald M. Lynne and Leeuwen van John, The Organic Chemistry of Plant Residues: Comparison Of NMR and Pyrolysis Data Using Multivariate Statistical Approaches, Current Organic Chemistry 2013; 17 (24) . https://dx.doi.org/10.2174/13852728113179990124
DOI https://dx.doi.org/10.2174/13852728113179990124 |
Print ISSN 1385-2728 |
Publisher Name Bentham Science Publisher |
Online ISSN 1875-5348 |
![](/images/wayfinder.jpg)
- Author Guidelines
- Bentham Author Support Services (BASS)
- Graphical Abstracts
- Fabricating and Stating False Information
- Research Misconduct
- Post Publication Discussions and Corrections
- Publishing Ethics and Rectitude
- Increase Visibility of Your Article
- Archiving Policies
- Peer Review Workflow
- Order Your Article Before Print
- Promote Your Article
- Manuscript Transfer Facility
- Editorial Policies
- Allegations from Whistleblowers
- Announcements