Abstract
This work deals with the use of predictors to identify useful B-cell linear epitopes to develop immunoassays. Experimental techniques to meet this goal are quite expensive and time consuming. Therefore, we tested 5 free, online prediction methods (AAPPred, ABCpred, BcePred, BepiPred and Antigenic) widely used for predicting linear epitopes, using the primary structure of the protein as the only input. We chose a set of 65 experimentally well documented epitopes obtained by the most reliable experimental techniques as our true positive set. To compare the quality of the predictor methods we used their positive predictive value (PPV), i.e. the proportion of the predicted epitopes that are true, experimentally confirmed epitopes, in relation to all the epitopes predicted. We conclude that AAPPred and ABCpred yield the best results as compared with the other programs and with a random prediction procedure. Our results also indicate that considering the consensual epitopes predicted by several programs does not improve the PPV.
Keywords: Diagnostic, epitope, immunochemical, linear B-cell epitopes, prediction, program, reagents.
Protein & Peptide Letters
Title:Evaluation and Comparison of the Ability of Online Available Prediction Programs to Predict True Linear B-cell Epitopes
Volume: 20 Issue: 6
Author(s): Juan G. Costa, Pablo L. Faccendini, Silvano J. Sferco, Claudia M. Lagier and Ivan S. Marcipar
Affiliation:
Keywords: Diagnostic, epitope, immunochemical, linear B-cell epitopes, prediction, program, reagents.
Abstract: This work deals with the use of predictors to identify useful B-cell linear epitopes to develop immunoassays. Experimental techniques to meet this goal are quite expensive and time consuming. Therefore, we tested 5 free, online prediction methods (AAPPred, ABCpred, BcePred, BepiPred and Antigenic) widely used for predicting linear epitopes, using the primary structure of the protein as the only input. We chose a set of 65 experimentally well documented epitopes obtained by the most reliable experimental techniques as our true positive set. To compare the quality of the predictor methods we used their positive predictive value (PPV), i.e. the proportion of the predicted epitopes that are true, experimentally confirmed epitopes, in relation to all the epitopes predicted. We conclude that AAPPred and ABCpred yield the best results as compared with the other programs and with a random prediction procedure. Our results also indicate that considering the consensual epitopes predicted by several programs does not improve the PPV.
Export Options
About this article
Cite this article as:
Costa Juan G., Faccendini Pablo L., Sferco Silvano J., Lagier Claudia M. and Marcipar Ivan S., Evaluation and Comparison of the Ability of Online Available Prediction Programs to Predict True Linear B-cell Epitopes, Protein & Peptide Letters 2013; 20 (6) . https://dx.doi.org/10.2174/0929866511320060011
DOI https://dx.doi.org/10.2174/0929866511320060011 |
Print ISSN 0929-8665 |
Publisher Name Bentham Science Publisher |
Online ISSN 1875-5305 |
- Author Guidelines
- Graphical Abstracts
- Fabricating and Stating False Information
- Research Misconduct
- Post Publication Discussions and Corrections
- Publishing Ethics and Rectitude
- Increase Visibility of Your Article
- Archiving Policies
- Peer Review Workflow
- Order Your Article Before Print
- Promote Your Article
- Manuscript Transfer Facility
- Editorial Policies
- Allegations from Whistleblowers
Related Articles
-
Recent Developments in Lipid Drugs
Mini-Reviews in Medicinal Chemistry Patent Selections
Recent Patents on Anti-Infective Drug Discovery Artificial Blood: A Futuristic Dimension of Modern Day Transfusion Sciences
Cardiovascular & Hematological Agents in Medicinal Chemistry The Covid-19, Epidemiology, Clinic and Prevention
Current Genomics Neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein via Natural Compounds: A Multilayered High Throughput Virtual Screening Approach
Current Pharmaceutical Design Robust Modeling and Scaffold Hopping: Case Study Based on HIV Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors Type-1 Data
Medicinal Chemistry Withdrawal Notice: Current Drug Trends for the Treatment of the SARS- CoV-2
Coronaviruses Computer-Aided Perspective for the Design of Flexible HIV Non- Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors (NNRTIs): de-novo Drug Design, Virtual Screening and Molecular Dynamics Simulations
Letters in Drug Design & Discovery Mechanism of Cardiac Pathogenesis and Cardiotoxicity of Anti- COVID-19 Drugs
Coronaviruses Targeting Natural Products for the Treatment of COVID-19 – An Updated Review
Current Pharmaceutical Design COVID-19 and Alcohol Misuse: A Case Report
Infectious Disorders - Drug Targets A Case Study: Analysis of Patents on Coronaviruses and Covid-19 for Technological Assessment and Future Research
Current Pharmaceutical Design Interaction Between Two Residues in the Inter-Domain Interface of Escherichia coli Peptidase N Modulates Catalytic Activity
Protein & Peptide Letters Pleural Effusion as a Sign of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pneumonia: A Case Report
Infectious Disorders - Drug Targets Targeted Multimodal Liposomes for Nano-delivery and Imaging: An Avenger for Drug Resistance and Cancer
Current Gene Therapy Prevention and Management of SARS-CoV-2 Infection Among the Health Care Workers
Coronaviruses Docking Simulations Exhibit Bortezomib and other Boron-containing Peptidomimetics as Potential Inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease
Current Chemical Biology Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Cardiology Resident Training and Education
New Emirates Medical Journal The Role of Advanced Technologies Supplemented with Traditional Methods in Pharmacovigilance Sciences
Recent Patents on Biotechnology Modulation of γ<sub>2</sub>-MSH Hepatoprotection by Antisense Peptides and Melanocortin Subtype 3 and 4 Receptor Antagonists
Medicinal Chemistry