Generic placeholder image

Recent Patents on Mechanical Engineering

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 2212-7976
ISSN (Online): 1874-477X

Research Article

Risk Assessment Model of Emergency Lane Change Behavior for Intelligent Vehicles

Author(s): Feng Yixuan, Zhang Huanhuan*, Yao Minjie and Wu Hongchao

Volume 17, Issue 3, 2024

Published on: 04 March, 2024

Page: [208 - 221] Pages: 14

DOI: 10.2174/0122127976290621240212054625

Price: $65

conference banner
Abstract

Background: The condition that vehicles are prone to skidding during emergency lane changing, an anti-rollover constraint is added to the trajectory planning.

Methods: The evaluation index is constructed by the lateral load transfer rate LTR, so as to put forward a seventh-order polynomial trajectory planning method considering the anti-rollover. It improves the safety and stability of the planned trajectory of the intelligent vehicle when changing lanes in an emergency. The risk assessment index under different emergency lane changing modes is obtained through simulation tests, the phase plane method is used to classify the risk level and formulate a reasonable risk decision-making mechanism. A patented model for risk assessment considering the risk of instability is designed.

Results: The tests conducted on a low-friction road show that when the risk assessment factor is in the range of the steering lane change mode intervals, the steering controller maneuvers the vehicle to make an emergency lane change with a seventh-order polynomial trajectory.

Conclusion: The small fluctuation of the LTR verifies the feasibility of the model.

[1]
Al Rashdi SA, Sudhir CV, Basha JS, et al. A case study on the electrical energy auditing and saving techniques in an educational institution (IMCO, Sohar, Oman). Case Stud Therm Eng 2022; 31: 101820.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2022.101820]
[2]
Afzal A, Mujeebu AM. Thermo-mechanical and structural performances of automobile disc brakes: A review of numerical and experimental studies. Arch Comput Methods Eng 2019; 26(5): 1489-513.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11831-018-9279-y]
[3]
Cao M, Wu G, Yan S, Qian X. Control strategy of vehicle anti-rollover considering driver’s characteristic. IEEE Access 2020; 8: 128264-81.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3008093]
[4]
Minh VT, Pumwa J. Feasible path planing for autonomous vehicles. Math Probl Eng 2014; 20(4): 1-12.
[5]
Blank M, Margolis DL. Minimizing the path radius of curvature for collision avoidance. Veh Syst Dyn 2000; 33(3): 183-201.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1076/0042-3114(200003)33:3;1-Y;FT183]
[6]
Boada MJL, Boada BL, Munoz A. Integrated control of front-wheel steering and front braking forces on the basis of fuzzy logic. Proc- Inst Mech Eng 220(3): 253-67.
[7]
Zhang Y, Antonsson EK, Grote K. A new threat assessment measure for collision avoidance systems. IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference 2006; 968-75.
[8]
Milanés V, Pérez J, Godoy J, Onieva E. A fuzzy aid rear-end collision warning/avoidance system. Expert Syst Appl 2012; 39(10): 9097-107.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.02.054]
[9]
Käfer E, Hermes C, Wöhler C, et al. Recognition of situation classes at road intersections. IEEE international conference on robotics and automation 2010; 3960-5.
[10]
Brand M, Oliver N, Pentland A. Coupled hidden Markov models for complex action recognition. Proceedings of IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
[11]
Oliver N, Pentland AP. Graphical models for driver behavior recognition in a Smart-Car. Proceedings of the IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium 2000 IV 2000; 7-12.
[12]
Yoo JH, Langari R. Development of a predictive collision avoidance for subjective adjacent risk estimation. American Control Conference (ACC) 2015; 3334-41.
[13]
Aoude GS, Luders BD, How JP, et al. Sampling-based threat assessment algorithms for intersection collisions involving errant drivers. IFAC Proceedings Volumes 2010; 43(16): 581-6.
[14]
Aoude GS, Joseph J, Roy N, How JP. Mobile agent trajectory prediction using bayesian nonparametric reachability trees. Infotech@ Aerospace 2011; 29-31. March, 2011; St. Louis, Missouri.
[15]
NIE Y, WANG B. Vehicle lane-changing behavior recognition method and apparatus. CN Patent WO2021217485A1, 2011.
[16]
Systems and methods for providing guidance to vehicle drivers regarding predicted lane-change behavior of other vehicle drivers. Patent 11,151,880, 2011.
[17]
Liu Z, Wang L. Vehicle emergency lane changing risk assessment method based on vehicle kinematics and genetic algorithm.
[18]
Mouhagir H, Talj R, Cherfaoui V, et al. Integrating safety distances with trajectory planning by modifying the occupancy grid for autonomous vehicle navigation. IEEE, International Confere-nce on Intelligent Transportation Systems 1114-9.
[19]
Keller M, Hoffmann F, Hass C, et al. Planning of optimal collision avoidance trajectories with timed elastic bands. IFAC Proceedings Volumes 2014; 47(3): 9822-7.
[20]
Shibata N, Sugiyama S, Wada T. Collision avoidance control with steering using velocity potential field. 2014 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium Proceedings Dearborn 2014; 438-43.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IVS.2014.6856469]
[21]
Soudbakhsh D, Eskandarian A, Chichka D. Vehicle collision avoidance maneuvers with limited lateral acceleration using optimal trajectory control. J Dyn Syst Meas Control 2013; 135(4): 041006.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.4023943]
[22]
Ren D, Zhang J, Zhang J, Cui SM. Trajectory planning and yaw rate tracking control for lane changing of intelligent vehicle on curved road. Sci China Technol Sci 2011; 54(3): 630-42.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11431-010-4227-6]
[23]
Isermann R, Mannale R, Schmitt K. Collision-avoidance systems PRORETA: Situation analysis and intervention control. IFAC Proceedings Volumes 20(11): 1236-46.
[24]
Kapania NR, Gerdes JC. Design of a feedback-feedforward steering controller for accurate path tracking and stability at the limits of handling. Veh Syst Dyn 2015; 53(12): 1687-704.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00423114.2015.1055279]
[25]
Lee T, Kang J, Yi K, Noh K. An investigation on the integrated human driver model for closed-loop simulation of intelligent safety systems. J Mech Sci Technol 2010; 24(3): 761-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12206-010-0202-1]

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy