Login Register Cart 0
Generic placeholder image

International Journal of Sensors, Wireless Communications and Control

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 2210-3279
ISSN (Online): 2210-3287

Back
Journal Home About Journal Editorial Board Journal Insight Current Issue Volumes/Issues
Subscribe
Research Article

Delay and Fairness Analysis of C-RAN for Single and Multi Scheduling Domain Strategies

Author(s): Prasanna Dubey, Raksha Upadhyay*, Uma Rathore Bhatt and Vijay Bhat

Volume 14, Issue 2, 2024

Published on: 31 January, 2024

Page: [134 - 143] Pages: 10

DOI: 10.2174/0122103279285271240112052931

Price: $65

Abstract

Background: Centralized Radio Access Network (C-RAN) is the most promising network architecture for next-generation communication networks. It meets the need for flexibility on fronthaul as well as large bandwidth on backhaul of the network. All along, scheduling is very important for the transmission of information in an organized manner. C-RAN has not been studied with the scheduling domain strategies yet in the literature.

Objectives: In this work, packet transmission duration, overall transmission time, wait time, and fairness index parameters have been calculated and analysed for C-RAN architecture for two different scheduling domains. The total transmission cycle time parameter is calculated for the three upper functional split options of C-RAN. The overall transmission time is a parameter calculated for the entire uplink channel.

Methods: To implement the network scenario, extensive scripting is done on MATLAB Editor for single scheduling domain (SSD) and multi-scheduling domain (MSD) for three higher functional split options of C-RAN. The data traffic generated in the network is considered random.

Results: A closer examination of results reveals the advantages and disadvantages of both algorithms, as well as trade-offs between them.

Conclusion: For quicker data transmission, SSD should be preferred whereas MSD should be preferred if multiple users want to access resources simultaneously. Lower functional split options of C-RAN require less transmission cycle time. The MSD technique is fairer than SSD.

« Previous Next »
Graphical Abstract

[1]
Fiorani M, Tombaz S, Mårtensson J, Skubic B, Wosinska L, Monti P. Modeling energy performance of C-RAN with optical transport in 5G network scenarios. J Opt Commun Netw 2016; 8(11): B21.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOCN.8.000B21]
[2]
Dubey P, Upadhyay R, Bhatt UR. Latency analysis of different functional split options of C-RAN with slot based DBA on TWDM-PON. In: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering. Springer, Singapore.: Kumar, A., Mozar, S. (eds) ICCCE 2021; 828: pp. 1-13.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7985-8]
[3]
CPRI Specification V7.0. Standard Document Specification 2015; 0: 128.
[4]
Your full service fibre optic access network transport solution gigabit-capable passive optical network. Available from: http://www.itu.int/ITU-T/studygroups/com15/sg15-q2.html
[5]
ITU telecommunication standardization sector. 2010. Available from: www.itu.int/ITU-T
[6]
Larsen LMP, Checko A, Christiansen HL. A survey of the functional splits proposed for 5G mobile crosshaul networks. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor 2019; 21(1): 146-72.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2018.2868805]
[7]
Alliance N. Further study on critical C-RAN technologies In: A Deliverable by the NGMN Alliance. 2015.
[8]
Cheng X. Wavelength-agile optical access networking system. In: Optics InfoBase Conference Papers. 2011.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.902469]
[9]
IEEE communications society and institute of electrical and electronics engineers International Conference on Optical Network Design and Modeling (ONDM).
[10]
Mishra V, Upadhyay R, Bhatt UR, Kumar A. Wavelength-agile and radio-agile FiWi access network using dynamic scheduling to improve upstream delay and resource utilization. Heliyon 2019; 5(7): e02075.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02075] [PMID: 31372541]
[11]
Li L, Shao W, Zhou X. A flexible scheduling algorithm for the 5th-generation networks. Intelligent and Converged Networks 2021; 2(2): 101-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.23919/ICN.2020.0017]
[12]
Hui J, Gan C, Wu L, Xu Z. High bandwidth utilization DWBA algorithm for upstream channel in NG-EPON. IEEE Access 2022; 10: 99435-44.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3207170]
[13]
Samarneh AA, Alma’aitah AY. A scheduling algorithm for adaptive C-RAN architecture. 2022 13th International Conference on Information and Communication Systems, ICICS. 2022.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICICS55353.2022.9811223]
[14]
Nakayama Y, Hisano D, Maruta K. Adaptive C-RAN architecture with moving nodes toward beyond the 5G era. IEEE Netw 2020; 34(4): 249-55.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MNET.001.1900510]
[15]
McGarry MP, Reisslein M, Colbourn CJ, Maier M, Aurzada F, Scheutzow M. Just-in-time scheduling for multichannel EPONs. J Lightwave Technol 2008; 26(10): 1204-16.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2008.919366]
[16]
Jayaraman R, Manickam B, Annamalai S, Kumar M, Mishra A, Shrestha R. Effective resource allocation technique to improve QoS in 5G wireless network. Electronics 2023; 12(2): 451.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/electronics12020451]
[17]
Kurnia D. Modification of RR DBA for performance improvement of C-RAN on NG-PON2. Int J Intell Eng Syst 2021; 14(6): 579-87.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.22266/ijies2021.1231.51]
[18]
Alfadhli Y, Chen Y-W, Liu S, et al. Latency performance analysis of low layers function split for URLLC applications in 5G networks. Comput Netw 2019; 162: 106865.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2019.106865]
[19]
Mei H, Peng L. Flexible functional split for cost-efficient C-RAN. Comput Commun 2020; 161: 368-74.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2020.07.029]
[20]
IEEE 8023 Industry Connections Feasibility Assessment for the Next Generation of EPON IEEE 8023 Ethernet Working Group Communication From: IEEE 8023 Ethernet Working Group 1 2015. Available from: http://www.ieee802.org/3/ad_hoc/ngepon/ng_epon_report.pdf

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy