Abstract
Background: There are patents available related to fermented food and beverages which enhance to human health. Citrus limetta (Mosambi) has a high content of flavonoids and exhibits antioxidant activity, which could stimulate the digestive system and be useful for gastroprotective activity. It supports digestion by neutralizing the acidic digestive juices and reducing gastric acidity.
Objective: This study explored the potential of using waste peel extract from Citrus limetta to prevent ulcers. The study specifically sought to assess the anti-ulcer properties of fermented and non-fermented extracts and compare them. Further, the study looked at the potential benefits of treating or preventing ulcers with Citrus limetta waste peels and whether fermentation affected the efficacy of the treatment.
Methods: Thirty female Wistar albino rats were equally distributed into five different groups. Group 1 received distilled water (20 ml/kg/b.w); Group 2 received indomethacin (mg/kg/b.w); Group 3 received omeprazole (20 mg/kg/b.w); Group 4 received aqueous extract of Mosambi peel (400 mg/kg/b.w) and Group 5 received fermented product of extract of Mosambi peel (400 mg/kg/b.w).
Results: Findings explored that, compared to non-fermented citrus fruit juice, biofermented exhibited less gastric volume (1.58 ± 0.10 ml vs. 1.8 ± 0.14 ml), reduced MDA levels (355.23 ± 100.70 μmol/mg protein vs. 454.49 ± 155.88 μmol/mg protein), and low ulcer index (0.49 ± 0.07 vs. 0.72 ± 0.14).
Conclusion: The results suggest that the bio-fermented product of Citrus limetta peel has better anti-ulcer potential against peptic ulcer induced by indomethacin in Wistar albino rats compared to non-fermented.
Graphical Abstract
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/13880200903302838] [PMID: 20673173]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/519590] [PMID: 24971094]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CPAA.S245672] [PMID: 32636685]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjp.2014.07.011]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.07.054]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf970373s] [PMID: 18593176]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.33263/LIANBS92.10421048]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12906-019-2457-0] [PMID: 30786935]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v16.i13.1622] [PMID: 20355240]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.1460] [PMID: 32180979]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2167-0412.1000196]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.btre.2021.e00671] [PMID: 34603976]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2020.12.020]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10496475.2019.1679691]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0100073] [PMID: 24932616]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JEP.S125383] [PMID: 28144167]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(79)90738-3] [PMID: 36810]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2012.03.006] [PMID: 22425905]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bj.2018.01.001] [PMID: 29673551]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1934578X1000500827] [PMID: 20839635]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ptr.2419] [PMID: 18618521]